Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Настя про счастье 🇲🇽 🇺🇸

Channel

Настя про счастье 🇲🇽 🇺🇸

@anastasia_be_happy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,121subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001612216519
TypeChannel
Username@anastasia_be_happy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anastasia_be_happy

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1211,1331,1276 August 2026 — 1,124 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,124 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,126 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,133 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,130 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,133 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,125 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,128 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,127 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,130 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,121 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 37 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,119–1,135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 20:011,121-9
7 Sept 2026, 17:221,130+3
2 Sept 2026, 23:241,127-1
27 Aug 2026, 18:471,128+3
24 Aug 2026, 09:241,125-8
20 Aug 2026, 11:451,133+3
17 Aug 2026, 12:081,130-3
10 Aug 2026, 05:331,133+7
6 Aug 2026, 22:511,126+2
6 Aug 2026, 12:041,124no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:081,124first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

232 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12252.6%
🔥2510.8%
❤‍🔥208.62%
👍198.19%
💯83.45%
🐳73.02%
😍73.02%
🥰52.16%
😢41.72%
🏆31.29%
🙏31.29%
🍓20.862%
👏20.862%
😁20.862%
🤔20.862%
💊10.431%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anastasia_be_happy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 April 2026 to 11 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC238 views16 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Лучше любить и потерять или не любить вообще? Знать о том, как может быть лучше и идти туда или наслаждаться тем, что имеем? Постоянно растить свою норму? Ставить большие цели? Или быть в моменте? Или допустить, что всему из вышеперечисленного может быть место? Если вы также как и я не можете определиться с образом жизни - - то вы на зоже, - то на рейве, - то вы работаете не в себя, - то не можете себя заставить …

❤8❤‍🔥3🔥3👍1🙏1

7 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTC323 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

▪️Мне папа говорил, когда я маленькая была, что серьезно заработать можно только в 2х случаях: - родиться в богатой семье - наворовать 😄😄 Интересная установка? А главное удобная 😁 Соблазнительная даже. Не в смысле “идти по воровской”, а в смысле - ничего не делать: не рисковать, не ошибаться - а охнуть и сказать "ну а что я мог, не в такой богатой семье родился" Но мы не обо мне (и моем темном прошлом), а о том, …

🔥8❤7

2 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC601 views24 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

▪️Ты не разрешаешь себе быть богатым.. 🫠 А, вот в чем дело оказывается.. А я то думала.. Если коротко, то это неуниверсальный диагноз, а точнее попытка свести десятки причин к одной Может ли это быть так? Вполне. Точно ли у вас так? Вряд ли. Вокруг нас эра рилзов много разных специалистов, медитаций на правильные денежные установки, столько же тех, кто говорит, что это бред 😁 Находясь в кризисе или просто момент…

❤12👍7🐳5

30 Jun 2026, 12:25 UTC413 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

одна из причин, почему у меня всё получается в этой жизни очень осторожно рассказываю друзьям, что практикую (не зову конечно, их нельзя, а просто делюсь) 😁 всегда сталкиваюсь исключительно только с поддержкой в этом огромная их заслуга - они понимающие, зрелые и принимающие люди но есть и моя - я других рядом с собой не держу за профессиональным советом - схожу к психологу, супервизору, возьму консультацию но …

❤12😍4👍2👏2💊1

30 Jun 2026, 12:25 UTC356 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

тут рассказала как ко мне записаться и про что я

❤2🔥1

30 Jun 2026, 12:25 UTCviews —

Настя про счастье 🇲🇽 🇺🇸 pinned «🩵 КАК ЗАПИСАТЬСЯ НА СЕССИЮ? ▪️ напишите @kryakvina “хочу на сессию” и мы подберем время, отвечаю в течение 2 часов Узнать меня получше (топ 7 моих материалов для вас) ▪️ПРО МЕНЯ: - психолог с предпринимательским опытом (диплом Skolkovo) - 10 лет управляла…»

23 Jun 2026, 16:11 UTC418 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

я тут уже какое-то время практикую как психолог и хочется сказать, что такого быстрого дофамина я не получала давно.. когда к тебе приходит человек с какой-то проблемой, делится, доверяет (что само по себе шок) и ты сначала вообще не понимаешь в чем причина его «страданий» текущих, а потом КАААК понимаешь и вы оба такие «ДА ЛААААДНО, ДА СЕРЬЕЗНО» 🙄 и люди ко мне приходят прямо «мои», но по-другому видимо и не быва…

❤8🏆3👍3🐳2

29 May 2026, 16:34 UTC530 views11 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

краткое описание мой личности 😂 спасибо всем кто откликнулся, на вас держится мир 🌍❤️❤️❤️

❤8😁2💯1

28 May 2026, 12:38 UTC505 views7 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026

Привет, мои хорошие, я билеты в Мексику купила, Газую скоро 😁

❤‍🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @anastasia_be_happy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Настя про счастье 🇲🇽 🇺🇸” (@anastasia_be_happy), 1,121 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anastasia_be_happy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.