Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Женская власть ☠️☠️☠️

@vlast_Zh

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

13,410subscribers

-41 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001054481184
TypeChannel
Username@vlast_Zh
DescriptionКанал Залины Маршенкуловой о нетрадиционных ценностях. Поддерживайте меня в войне с мракобесием и вступайте в профем тиндер https://ko-fi.com/vlast_zh/tiers Написать мне – @mayachok_antihrista
Created8 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vlast_Zh

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Женская власть — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

13,41013,45113,430.55 August 2026 — 13,451 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,451 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,450 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,440 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,435 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,432 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,425 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,420 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,422 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,410 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,404–13,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 04:4813,410-12
12 Aug 2026, 21:5313,422+2
11 Aug 2026, 23:2713,420-5
10 Aug 2026, 20:5313,425-7
9 Aug 2026, 17:4313,432-3
8 Aug 2026, 16:0313,435-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:0113,440-10
6 Aug 2026, 18:1013,450-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:3113,451no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:2613,451first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 13,410 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held30 (30 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total58,170
Reactions total2,361
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,910
Videos
544
Links
5,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 35s
Average length
2m 12s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,361 reactions across 30 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
71030.1%
💯68429.0%
❤‍🔥1837.75%
🔥1365.76%
🤣1335.63%
🥰853.60%
👍642.71%
🙏632.67%
💊512.16%
421.78%
😁361.52%
😍321.36%
😎261.10%
😐210.889%
😢210.889%
🕊190.805%
💔130.551%
👏100.424%
🤗40.169%
🫡40.169%
16 further kinds241.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,361reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vlast_Zh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,020 views42 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Следите в моем инстаграме за фотками, которые могут помешать моей политической карьере

😍30❤‍🔥7🥰31💔1

13 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,070 views69 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Часто думаю об этом — почему женщине запрещено быть сексуально раскрепощенной и вообще самой собой. Почему одно каким-то образом отменяет другое? Почему женщина должна быть либо умной, либо голой? Это всё вполне можно совмещать. Сейчас стала еще чаще размышлять об этом в свободном от предрассудков Берлине. Мой любимый город ПОЛИАМОРСК (где хоть в чем ты одет — всем похуй как ты одет)

45🔥17💯5🥰2

13 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,070 views65 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Очень сложно разрываться между желанием показать сиськи и желанием построить политическую карьеру. В каком ужасном несвободном мире мы живем, коллеги!

43🔥11💯9🥰2

13 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈1,090 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Как сказала великая председательница совета нашей партии Екатерина Кильтау — фрукт убрали, но овощи остались. Что делать в такой ситуации

18❤‍🔥2🌭2

13 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,190 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Сделала важный политический рилс на два лайка! Пытаюсь объяснить иностранцам что происходит и за что можно словить статус «террориста» в России

24🥰2

11 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈2,630 views83 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Здоровый человек не будет вечно доказывать каким-то ебантяям, что он достаточно хороший. Он просто пошлет нахуй эти токсичные отношения и правильно сделает. Так что я хз каким образом левые с их этой внутренней МОРАЛЬНОЙ черепомеркой собираются становиться популярными у общества. Если они своих же самых безупречных борцов ни за что не прощают, то че там обычных людей ждет

💯5914👍32🫡2❤‍🔥1🥰1🦄1

11 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC≈2,480 views100 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Сказала на днях левацкому сообществу, что главный принцип, по которому я выбирала себе сторону — не быть надменным токсичным говном. Обычно это в основе идеологии правых лежит неебическая надменность и высокомерие: потому что у них там все просто — ты бедный потому что ты тупой. Ты женщина? Ты тупая. Ты черный? Ты тупой. Все) Просто и легко. В целом. Плохо живешь? Сам виноват! Не будь тупым. Отрезало ноги поездом? С

💯49👍25😐9😢65❤‍🔥21🤨1

11 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC≈1,500 views80 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Отношения с так называемым прогрессивным левым сообществом — это как токсичные отношения с нарциссом — ты всегда будешь для него недостаточно хороша! Недостаточно феминистка и недостаточно идеологически чистая! А вот дочь маминой подруги более лучшая феминистка, чем ты!! Эти отменяторы со своей отменялкой просто заебали уже

💯35👍23❤‍🔥9🔥6😐4🥰2😢1

11 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,520 views81 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Я думаю просто если вам буквально идеальный человек всё равно недостаточно идеальный — идите вы нахуй уже просто тогда. Лечитесь. Не знают уже куда свою злобу и фрустрацию слить. На меня и на Монеточку сливают, а могли бы на Путина! (а нет, не могли бы! То-то и оно)

💯5713😐53🥰1😁1😢1

11 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,480 views99 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Понятно, когда меня пытаются отменить за какую-то выдуманную хуйню (я феминистка, содомитка, полиаморка, само собой вражина рода человеческого, априори). Но как я охуеваю, когда отменяют буквально конвенционально идеального человека — Монеточку. Воистину все окончательно пизданулись уже в русскоязычном пространстве. В России не любят любить, в России любят ненавидеть

💯80😢7😁5😐3😱21🤷‍♀1

10 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈1,660 views43 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @praguebooktowerVideo

Залина Маршенкулова — авторка книги «Всё было хорошо, пока не пришли феминистки», изданной @vidimbooks — приглашает на «Пражскую книжную башню» ✨️ В субботу 12 сентября будем говорить о книге и о том, как менялся российский феминизм с 2010-х до наших дней. Приходите в гости! ✨️ Пражская книжная башня 11-13 сентября 2026 Spojka Karlin, Pernerova 697/35 Вход свободный Программа ярмарки скоро будет доступна на нашем

❤‍🔥2014🥰3👍1💘1🤩1🫡1😍1

4 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC≈3,170 views107 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Вообще высший знак уважения в обществе это то, что даже ненавидящие меня фемки из лагеря жертвенисток почти всегда любых женщин в любой ситуации считают какими-то там запутавшимися бедняжками, но только не меня! То есть всегда у них любая женщина сказала или сделала что-то, потому что она «бедняжка под влиянием темных сил». А вот я — всегда в их глазах абсолютно самостоятельная мразь, и никогда не бедняжка) То есть

56❤‍🔥22😁21😎32🐳1💊1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @vlast_Zh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 137,489 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q107031377 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelZalina Marshenkulova
DescriptionRussian feminist
X / Twitter@veritas_z
YouTubeUC7WtaiX4yXVuIt2n0v0PqoQ

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Женская власть ☠️☠️☠️” (@vlast_Zh), 13,410 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vlast_Zh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.