Все, что вы хотели знать про облигации, но стеснялись спросить
Реклама: @IF_adv
https://edu.investfuture.club/kontacts
Канал Киры Юхтенко: @kira_pronira
Комьюнити и разбан: @community_if
Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3TFdtz
Created
25 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95,270–95,376 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 21:56
95,282
-14
11 Aug 2026, 18:43
95,296
-8
10 Aug 2026, 20:16
95,304
-25
9 Aug 2026, 19:59
95,329
+4
8 Aug 2026, 18:18
95,325
-11
7 Aug 2026, 14:56
95,336
-28
6 Aug 2026, 16:27
95,364
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:34
95,364
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.9%
avg views ÷ 95,282 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,700
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.288%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
37 (23 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
876,210
Reactions total
2,520
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,710
Videos
≈50
Links
≈1,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,328 reactions across 34 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
840
36.1%
❤
574
24.7%
🎉
149
6.40%
👌
131
5.63%
🤔
111
4.77%
😢
105
4.51%
🌭
85
3.65%
😱
76
3.26%
🔥
49
2.10%
🥴
48
2.06%
😁
47
2.02%
🤯
36
1.55%
🤣
24
1.03%
🤬
13
0.558%
❤🔥
12
0.515%
🌚
11
0.473%
🐳
8
0.344%
💯
5
0.215%
🕊
2
0.086%
🥰
2
0.086%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,520reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 37 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @if_bonds. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💰 Золото растёт, рубль слабеет. Есть ли идея в золотых бондах Селигдара?
Мы уже не раз писали, что золото остаётся одной из главных защитных идей на рынке. Теперь свежий прогноз дали аналитики СберИнвестиций: в августе они ждут золото в диапазоне $4000–4400 за унцию. В рублях это около 10 500–12 000 руб. за грамм.
Золото в России считается через долларовую цену металла и курс USD/RUB. Поэтому если рубль слабеет, а …
🚗 Фикс собрали, флоатер снова перенесли. Что происходит с Балтийским лизингом?
Завсегдатай долгового рынка Балтийского лизинг сегодня собрал заявки на фиксированный выпуск БО-П26: объём зафиксировали на уровне 1,2 млрд руб. Финальный купон — 18,25%, доходность к погашению — 19,86%. А вот флоатер БО-П17 снова перенесли. Ещё в мае прошлого года Балтийский лизинг пытался разместить его вместе с фиксированным 16 выпуск…
😬 ЦБ снижает ставку, а рынок ему не верит?
Ну что, ключевая ставка 14%, недельная инфляция снова около нуля, а акции отскочили от дна. Но рынок госдолга рассказывает менее оптимистичную историю.
💁♂️ Чтобы одолжить государству деньги до середины 2030-х — начала 2040-х, инвесторы требуют около 15,6% годовых. То есть больше нынешней ключевой ставки. Причём почти неважно, вернут деньги в 2036-м или 2040-м: за четыре д…
⚡️Облигации "КЛВЗ Кристалл" обвалились: на 13 августа назначено заседание Хамовнического районного суда по уголовному делу против Победкина Павла Викторовича
Победкин — конечный акционер ООО "КЛВЗ Кристалл".
Дело против Победкина было зарегистрировано еще 24 марта 2026 года. Суд уже 12 раз переносил заседание.
Павел Победкин обвиняется по п. «а, б» ч. 2 ст. 199 УК РФ: уклонение от уплаты налогов с организации груп…
💱 Рубль снова слабеет. Как защитить капитал?
Недавно мы писали о валютных облигациях на фоне ослабления рубля. Ещё в конце мая доллар стоил около 70 рублей, юань — меньше 10,3 рубля. Теперь доллар поднялся выше 82, а юань выше 12 рублей.
💁♂️ Причин несколько: сокращается приток экспортной выручки, растёт спрос на валюту, завершился налоговый период, сохраняется геополитическая неопределённость. Кроме того, Минфин …
⛽️ ЕвроТранс допустил техдефолт по зелёным облигациям серии 002Р-01, не выплатив 25,48 млн рублей купона за 29-й период
Обязательство должно было быть исполнено 6 августа 2026 года. Речь о зелёных облигациях с ISIN RU000A1082G5, размещённых в рамках программы серии 002Р, следует из сообщения эмитента.
Причина — временная нехватка свободных денежных средств на счетах из-за неравномерного поступления выручки, указал …
😢 Физики в июле вложили в облигации в 2 раза меньше. Бонды больше не интересны?
Свежая статистика Мосбиржи выглядит для рынка облигаций не очень приятно. В июле 2026 года частные инвесторы вложили в облигации 100,9 млрд руб. Годом ранее, в июле 2025-го, было 206,8 млрд руб. То есть приток в облигации упал примерно в 2 раза год к году.
На этом фоне акции, наоборот, выглядят бодрее: вложения физиков в акции выросли с…
🏛 Итоги июля на рынке бондов: Выручка Минфина от размещения ОФЗ упала до 9,1 млрд рублей — минимума с сентября 2022 года
Ведомство приостановило аукционы для стабилизации рынка на фоне возросшей волатильности. За месяц размещено лишь 0,6% квартального плана в 1,5 трлн рублей — в июне выручка составляла 228 млрд рублей, следует из обзора ЦБ.
Что происходило на долговом рынке:
➖ Доходности ОФЗ на ближнем конце крив…
🏦 Что происходит с вашим вкладом через год
Сценарий, знакомый многим: в прошлом году вы открыли вклад под хорошую ставку. Год прошёл, вклад закрывается и вы планируете его пролонгировать - а условия уже заметно хуже. Это не случайность, а устройство инструмента.
➡️ Вклад — это короткая фиксация
Ставка держится ровно до конца срока. И банк не гарантирует, что при следующем оформлении вы получите такие же условия.
Ве…
🚊 ТрансКонтейнер опять выходит дуплетом: флоатер или фикс на фоне просевших финансов?
На первичке сразу два выпуска от ТрансКонтейнера — крупнейшего оператора железнодорожных контейнерных перевозок в России.
Компания большая, узнаваемая, с рейтингом AA- и сильной рыночной позицией. Но есть нюанс: финансовые результаты за 2025 год у компании сильно просели, и рейтинговые агентства уже начали смотреть на эмитента ост…
😳 Эмитент объявил дефолт. Что делать инвестору и вернут ли деньги?
Разбираем по закону, что происходит с вашими облигациями, если эмитент перестал платить.
Сначала — технический дефолт. Это ещё не приговор. У эмитента есть 10 рабочих дней, чтобы погасить просрочку. Уложился — статус снимается, живём дальше. Не уложился — на 11-й рабочий день наступает полноценный дефолт, и это уже серьёзно. Такие нормы действуют со…
😁 Облигации уже продали, а теперь акционер спрашивает: “А кто разрешал?”
На рынке облигаций ещё одна ситуация — не то плакать, не то смеяться. Первоуральскбанк разместил три выпуска облигаций на 830 млн руб. Бумаги уже на рынке, инвесторы их купили, банк спокойно живёт, рейтинг в мае даже повысили до BB+ со стабильным прогнозом.
И тут появляется акционер банка и говорит: погодите, а я вообще-то согласия на эти разме…
❤42🤯29👍6🌭4❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @if_bonds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@if_bonds edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 85,210 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
InvestFuture @investfuture · 184,500 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Т-Инвестиции @tb_invest_official · 530,656 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 August 2026
СберИнвестиции @SberInvestments · 254,364 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
ВТБ Моя Аналитика @omyinvestments · 212,989 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IF Bonds — Облигации РФ” (@if_bonds), 95,282 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/if_bonds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.