Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net +156. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,998–22,063 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 05:59
21,341
-4
6 Nov 2026, 07:26
21,345
-4
5 Nov 2026, 06:40
21,349
-4
4 Nov 2026, 07:55
21,353
-4
3 Nov 2026, 06:59
21,357
-7
1 Nov 2026, 11:27
21,364
-3
31 Oct 2026, 10:05
21,367
-7
30 Oct 2026, 11:27
21,374
-7
29 Oct 2026, 10:20
21,381
-5
28 Oct 2026, 09:49
21,386
-10
27 Oct 2026, 10:16
21,396
-10
26 Oct 2026, 06:55
21,406
-6
25 Oct 2026, 04:10
21,412
-6
24 Oct 2026, 02:55
21,418
-7
23 Oct 2026, 05:11
21,425
-4
22 Oct 2026, 06:15
21,429
-3
21 Oct 2026, 00:39
21,432
-2
20 Oct 2026, 01:40
21,434
-5
19 Oct 2026, 00:17
21,439
-4
18 Oct 2026, 03:39
21,443
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 21,341 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,240
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
57 (19 May 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
24,610
Reactions total
451
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 04:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
767
Videos
6
Links
220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
55s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,009 reactions across 55 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,046
68.0%
🔥
723
24.0%
💔
121
4.02%
🍓
86
2.86%
💯
33
1.10%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,110 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 57 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chtozakartina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Земля
Ян Брейгель Старший, 1610
Из года в год мой ответ на вопрос, кто мой любимый художник, остаётся неизменным. И это Ян Брейгель. И пофиг, Старший или Младший.
Тут у нас в центре стоит Деметра, древнегреческая богиня земледелия и плодородия, в окружении разнообразия фруктов, овощей, декоративных и съедобных растений. В античной мифологии её дочь Персефону похитил Аид. И пока Деметра искала её, земля перестала пр…
Ведьма, скачущая задом наперед на козле
Альбрехт Дюрер, ок. 1500–1501
А вот и средневековая гравюра на злобу дня.
Ведьма с растрепанными волосами, оседлаашая козла, да еще и задом наперед. В руках у нее веретено, а вокруг резвятся четыре крылатых путти.
В те времена козел традиционно ассоциировался с дьяволом, а движение задом наперед символизировало перевернутый, неправильный мир. Настоящий ренессансный Хэллоуин.
…
Так, у всех уже есть планы на Хэллоуин? Я вот завтра после пар собираюсь в пространство «Дни» — там будут отмечать праздник в эстетике Backrooms. Если что, это целая вселенная жутких лиминальных пространств, бесконечных коридоров и странных существ, которые в них обитают. Лучше не придумаешь!
Вначале exhibition, потом party.
С 20:00 слушаем лекцию о лиминальных пространствах и опыте визуальных артистов, а затем смо…
Геркулес и Омфала
Питер Пауль Рубенс, ок. 1602–1605
Геракл, он же Геркулес, был настолько сильным, что совершил 12 подвигов, победил кучу чудовищ и вообще привык решать вопросы кулаками. Но однажды накосячил, убил Ифита, сына царя Еврита, за что его продали на три года в рабство у царицы Омфалы, царица Лидии.Она заставляла героя прясть шерсть и носить женскую одежду. Сама же щеголяла в его львиной шкуре и держала ег…
В четверг ходила на групповую выставку «Миллион алых роз», где участвовала моя любимая художница Тася Василькова 🌹
Это какое-то новое пространство @martemanchello в лакшери тц Времена года, но кажется, это их временное грездышко. Когда-то в этом помещение был магазин Louis Vuitton. Вход 1500 рублей, осуждаем)
А вы слышали, что вход в Cube, который в The Carlton Moscow теперь тоже 2000 рублей или это слухи? 😮
История Виргинии
Сандро Боттичелли, ок. 1500
Тут у нас сцена, где римский чиновник Аппий Клавдий решил насильно заполучить себе дочь Луция Виргиния — Виргинию, объявив её рабыней через суд, где он сам должен был вынести этот приговор. Понимая, что дочь не спасти, отец не придумал ничего интереснее, чем тупо убить свою дочь, спасти от рабства.
Смерть Виргинии вызвала настоящее восстание против правителей Рима. Возму…
А пока хочу рассказать, как я вчера сходила на Врубеля в Музей декоративного искусства. Не могу сказать ничего плохого, но, кажется, мои ожидания не совпали с реальностью. Мне было мало самого Врубеля!
Работы старых мастеров вперемешку с современными, живопись, графика, фарфор и всё остальное. Вроде бы всё это должно показать, как художник повлиял на искусство будущего, но мне не хватило связующего звена. Как мне по…
Голова со скрепкой
Олег Целков, 1981
Тут у нас одна из жутковатых «морд» Целкова — лысая голова с пронзительным взглядом, зажатая огромной скрепкой, будто лист бумаги. Так и хочется крикнуть «Соберись!». А над головой еще и гвоздь прибит.
Точного объяснения, зачем тут эти нишевые предметы, нет. Но, как правило, художник использует что-то схожее для создания ощущения жесткости ситуации. При этом лица почти всегда не…
А вы когда-нибудь были в Черноголовке?
Ещё летом меня позвали на превью второго сезона арт-резиденции «Гало». Мы ходили по закрытой территории НИИ, заглядывали в научную лабораторию, кормили оленей, а после ходили по будущим выставочным площадкам — бывший ЗАГС с витражами и заброшенную оранжерею.
И вот наконец-то выставка «Капсула памяти» открылась для всех! Изначально наукоград Черноголовка построили в 1950-х года…
Делюсь новостями!
Операция прошла хорошо, он уже почти отошел от наркоза, но слаб и поэтому не особо хочет кушать, но его заставляют. Пока мне не разрешают его навестить. Я вчера внесла на депозит 30к, чтобы хватило на все расходы, анализы и процедуры. Он на обезболе и под капельницей.
Спасибо вам!!!
В результаты операции из него вытащили косточку от оливки 😭😭😭 Кто ж знал, что он может такое проглотить, любитель з…
❤119
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @chtozakartina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@chtozakartina edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @chtozakartina as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
11 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В эпоху Возрождения один художник был помешан на геометрии. Он рисовал идеальные пропорции человека, вписывал их в круг и квадрат. Получилось так круто, что его рисунок до сих пор печатают в учебниках и на обложках блокнотов для архитекторов.
Альбрехт Дюрер4%
Леонардо да Винчи91%
Рафаэль Санти2%
Микеланджело Буонарроти3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
История одной картины @pic_history · 50,032 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
английский для дебилов @debilenglish · 60,777 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“поясни за ренессанс” (@chtozakartina), 21,341 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chtozakartina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.