This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1,741. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,249–7,514 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 04:42
7,253
+1,718
9 Aug 2026, 12:01
5,535
+25
6 Aug 2026, 13:10
5,510
-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:35
5,512
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:06
5,512
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
92.1%
avg views ÷ 7,253 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,680
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
44 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
294,078
Reactions total
4,971
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 27s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,807 reactions across 27 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,884
39.2%
🤡
975
20.3%
🤬
501
10.4%
🖕
218
4.54%
🕊
182
3.79%
👏
176
3.66%
👍
119
2.48%
❤🔥
99
2.06%
💔
80
1.66%
😭
75
1.56%
😢
72
1.50%
💩
71
1.48%
😱
69
1.44%
😁
61
1.27%
🤣
43
0.895%
🌭
35
0.728%
👎
35
0.728%
🙏
30
0.624%
🔥
20
0.416%
🤯
16
0.333%
14 further kinds
46
0.957%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,971reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 44 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @endoflaw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Правозащитника Бахрома Хамроева лишили единственного гражданства и снова отправили в ШИЗО
Об этом перед заседанием по своему иску сообщил политзаключенный математик Азат Мифтахов, который, как и Хамроев, отбывает наказание в «Полярной сове».
⬅️Сейчас Хамроев находится в ШИЗО из-за того, что назвал начальника шовинистом➡️, — рассказал Мифтахов.
Напомним, что недавно его уже отправляли на 15 суток ШИЗО за одиночный …
#️⃣ Адвокат Мария Бонцлер попросила своих калининградских коллег не принимать заявки на ее защиту, после того как двух ее адвокатов отстранили от дела
Напомним, что защиту обвиняемой по статье о госизмене адвоката Марии Блонцлер осуществляли Илья Сидоров, Александр Чаузов и Роман Морозов. Сидоров и Чаузов 27 июля и 6 августа соответственно были отстранены судом от защиты из-за отказа знакомиться с секретными докумен…
Юрист Новоселов, оформивший иск «Родины» против «Яблока», в резюме сообщил, что работает «вне правого поля»
Одним из представителей партии «Родина» в суде против «Яблока», приведшем к его снятию с выборов, являлся юрист Алексей Новоселов, он же был указан контактным лицом в иске.
Ранее «Слово защите» уже писало, что в телефонных книжках Новоселов записан как «юрист ЕР» и «юрист «Единой России» по спойлерам», однако…
❗️Верховный суд снял «Яблоко» с выборов в Госдуму
Речь идёт о партийном списке. Кандидаты от «Яблока» по одномандатным округам пока ещё могут продолжать кампанию.
Отменить регистрацию «Яблока» на выборах требовала партия «Родина». Формальными поводами для иска стали обвинения в экстремизме, нарушении авторских прав, незаконном финансировании и ошибках при подаче документов в ЦИК. При этом лидер «Родины» Алексей Жу…
После скандирования «Яблоко! Яблоко!» следует обращение полиции в громкоговоритель:
- Уважаемые граждане! Просьба соблюдать порядок. Вы мешаете работать людям.
Видео: «Слово защите»
👮В СИЗО-1 в Кирове у адвокатов помимо ордера и удостоверения требуют заявление с подробным описанием цели визита
Адвокат Наталия Тихонова рассказала в своем телеграм-канале о посещении СИЗО-1 в Кирове, где помимо ордера и удостоверения сотрудники потребовали от нее заявление, в котором необходимо было подробно указать цель визита к подзащитному.
Адвокат отказалась предоставлять такие сведения, сославшись на то, что…
🤬9🤯4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @endoflaw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 923 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 86 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Слово защите” (@endoflaw), 7,253 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/endoflaw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
