Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мегастиль

Channel

Мегастиль

@megastil

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,273subscribers

-308 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001319193629
TypeChannel
Username@megastil
DescriptionАвторский канал о моде стилиста Иры Дубиной instagram.com/iradubina @hi_im_irina РКН № 4822251340
Created20 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/megastil

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,26613,58213,4246 August 2026 — 13,581 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,581 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,582 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,574 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,571 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,576 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,577 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,574 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,570 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,567 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,557 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,558 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,555 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,557 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,555 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,554 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,549 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,541 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,539 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,537 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,538 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,537 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,524 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,523 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,522 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,514 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,497 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,484 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,478 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,474 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,472 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,467 subscribers26 September 2026 — 13,440 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,377 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,370 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,352 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,348 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,349 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,350 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,349 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,336 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,337 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,330 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,319 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,318 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,317 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,315 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,311 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,302 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,308 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,305 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,296 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,297 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,288 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,281 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,277 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,275 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,266 subscribers10 November 2026 — 13,273 subscribers13,2736 August 202610 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 96 days, net -308. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,219–13,629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 16:0013,273+7
5 Nov 2026, 22:0913,266-9
4 Nov 2026, 20:4013,275-2
3 Nov 2026, 22:1613,277-4
2 Nov 2026, 18:4413,281-7
1 Nov 2026, 19:2713,288-9
31 Oct 2026, 17:3413,297+1
30 Oct 2026, 17:5513,296-9
29 Oct 2026, 21:2813,305-3
28 Oct 2026, 23:5613,308+6
27 Oct 2026, 03:2713,302-9
26 Oct 2026, 00:5813,311-4
24 Oct 2026, 22:3713,315-2
23 Oct 2026, 22:3613,317-1
22 Oct 2026, 20:4013,318-1
21 Oct 2026, 19:0613,319-11
20 Oct 2026, 17:3613,330-7
19 Oct 2026, 18:2113,337+1
18 Oct 2026, 21:1613,336-13
17 Oct 2026, 20:1013,349first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 13,273 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held25 (14 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total27,146
Reactions total315
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 20:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,020
Videos
≈144
Links
≈1,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

886 reactions across 25 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤61068.8%
💯657.34%
😁576.43%
🔥404.51%
❤‍🔥293.27%
😢212.37%
💘192.14%
😍171.92%
🌚80.903%
👍60.677%
💔60.677%
👀40.451%
🐳30.339%
🤓10.113%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 886 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 15:41 UTC≈4,880 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Наткнулась на архивное фото Девон Аоки, и вот вам нетривиальная идея для осенних стилизаций: обрезанные / укороченные джинсы (или удлиненные капри пэнтс) + фантазийные колготки + однотонные туфли

🔥13❤9

11 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC940 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Я: мне плевать на маркетинговые уловки, меня ими не возьмёшь Также я, когда в ленте попались патчи в виде дельфинов: 😵‍💫

❤21🐳3💔3

10 Nov 2026, 21:37 UTC873 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Вообще, Херст отнюдь не впервые прикладывает руку к дизайну люксовых сумок. В 2011-м он сотрудничал с Fendi, в 2012-м - с The Row (до сих пор помню, как все обсуждали стоимость того самого рюкзака из кожи аллигатора с декором в виде пилюль и таблеток - 55000 долларов, на минуточку), а в 2013-м - с Prada. Последняя - мой фаворит, настоящий пис оф арт.

❤10👍1

10 Nov 2026, 21:28 UTC851 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Какая прелестная сумка из коллаборации Balenciaga с Демиеном Херстом в честь 25-летия модели City. Остальные варианты из капсулы, на мой взгляд, какая-то чухня, а эта очень симп 🤭

❤16

10 Nov 2026, 16:49 UTC872 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Тотемное животное декабря в новом номере SSAW Magazine Стилизовал Patrick Welde, снимал Паша Голик

❤13🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC900 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

В продолжении разговора о микротрендах хочется упомянуть декор в виде подарочных бантов-розочек. Ищем у Coach в сезоне SS 2027 (броши, подвески), молодого лондонского бренда Oscar Ouyang (представлен в Dover Street Market) и дизайнера украшений Raphaël Everdeen

❤18

10 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC≈6,220 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Помните один из главных микротрендов с мужского показа Dries Van Noten SS 2027 - двойные носки? Так вот, отличный вариант обнаружился у японского бренда Tabio, который существует аж с 1968 года. У Tabio есть маленький магазинчик близ Риволи, но те же носки можно купить в их онлайн-магазине. Высота что надо, сочетания цветов - моднейшие, цена 20 евро.

😍17💘13❤7

5 Nov 2026, 18:14 UTC≈2,830 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

В свете анонса новой темы Met Gala 2027 очень надеюсь, что кто-то из гостей догадается прийти в этом платье Rick Owens SS 2020 из дешманского футболочного джерси (!), которое было представлено на первой fashion-выставке в Лувре в прошлом году, соло-выставке Рика Оуэнса в Palais Galliera тогда же и, к слову, является частью коллекции самого музея моды Metropolitan. А еще в 2019-м FKA Twigs выступила в нем для программ…

❤19❤‍🔥5👀4

1 Nov 2026, 12:29 UTC≈2,410 views35 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Идеальный парный выход Лотты и Артема Нанушьяна для вчерашнего Хэллоуина, или хорошо, когда у тебя с парнем одинаковый размер одежды (и обуви тоже) 🤭

❤30💯5

30 Oct 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,420 views18 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

После просмотра кадров с примерки для коммерции adidas от Джорджии Пендлбери срочно захотелось постилизовать какой-нибудь спортивный бренд…

❤16🔥2

30 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,210 views7 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Мне нравится тенденция, в рамках которой масс-маркет гиганты сотрудничают не только с равными себе по масштабу fashion-брендами, но и небольшими, относительно нишевыми (🤭) марками. Mango x Ekhaus Latta, Zara x Willy Chavarria, а теперь Topshop x Talia Byre. За Talia Byre я слежу, кажется, чуть ли не с момента его основания в 2020 году. Ценю его за последовательный, вдумчивый подход, четкое видение и какую-то общую ц…

❤7

26 Oct 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,330 views40 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Один из самых невероятных винтажных айтемов, что я видела за последнее время, можно купить прямо сейчас в лондонской винтажке Parisian Sweet - это асимметричный шелковый бомбер из культовой коллекции Гальяно для Dior SS 2000, и это как раз тот случай, когда ни одно подиумное фото не сможете передать всю красоту вещи. Вообще, у основателя Parisian Sweet, коллекционера Джакариа Фрэнсиса такое потрясающее собрание редч…

❤37💔3

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @megastil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Вишлист
@myhotelki · 48,127
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
РазразиМеняМаржела
@arbuzimargiela · 20,688
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 September 2026
time vs. vogue
@time_vs_vogue · 33,914
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
Гуд морнинг, Карл!
@goodmorningkarl · 55,732
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Copy Me
@copyme · 26,652
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Сделай лицо попроще
@straightface · 21,148
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
Отдел стиль жизни
@lifestylewhat · 45,640
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
shoes&drinks
@shoesanddrinks · 27,050
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
KSUSHA SMO
@styledbysmo · 38,697
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
ШМОТ
@zashmot · 105,426
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
KM20
@km20conceptstore · 21,000
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 September 2026
Olga Karput 🥬
@okarput · 31,073
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Style Tricks
@styletricks · 23,991
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
superficial space cadet
@superficialspacecadet · 24,930
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Безфильтров
@bezfiltrov_show · 28,831
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Будни Гальяно
@budnigalliano · 27,776
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Bon Mot
@lebonmot · 36,862
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мегастиль” (@megastil), 13,273 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/megastil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.