Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,681–5,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 06:19
5,688
-3
12 Sept 2026, 20:38
5,691
-4
8 Sept 2026, 20:59
5,695
-5
3 Sept 2026, 14:55
5,700
-3
31 Aug 2026, 00:17
5,703
-2
27 Aug 2026, 23:47
5,705
-4
24 Aug 2026, 14:14
5,709
-2
21 Aug 2026, 04:34
5,711
-1
18 Aug 2026, 10:37
5,712
-8
15 Aug 2026, 19:34
5,720
-8
12 Aug 2026, 13:24
5,728
-4
9 Aug 2026, 19:02
5,732
-4
7 Aug 2026, 00:56
5,736
-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:33
5,737
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:52
5,737
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
929 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
420
45.2%
😁
180
19.4%
👎
119
12.8%
💩
108
11.6%
🤮
53
5.71%
🔥
33
3.55%
👍
8
0.861%
😢
8
0.861%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 929 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 27 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Невже…
Я міг би, звісно, пожартувати, що цей текст написав ChatGPT — делегувати навіть власне прощання беземоційній машині (а потім ще пів року обговорювати в директах стиль її письма якось дуже підкреслює дух часу). Але, на жаль чи на щастя, це все ще я. Людина, яка надто довго думала про моду, людей, інтонації, несправедливість, чужі і власні амбіції, власні образи і те дивне, невгамовне бажання пояснювати світ са…
Довго трималися. Справді довго.
Але після ненавмисного занурення у стрітстайл-контент просто не можемо мовчати. Десь у грудях накопичився видих розміром з Олімпійський стадіон.
Що це було?
Пізні нульові/початок 10х, помножений на доволі рандомну роботу з речима з секонду і лейт-найт замовлення з Тему... Фрік-шоу!
Але! Той факт, що Тиждень Моди в Україні відбувається попри все — це не просто подія, це характер. Низ…
ЄДИНИЙ дійсно модний список ГАРЯЧИХ подарунків. Зібраний на Goodsend:
https://goodsend.it/goodsend/collections?collection_id=9e591efe-e868-4f86-891c-ace64416c3a3
Давайте краще в коментарях під цим постом влаштуємо дайджест хороших новин. Фешн-новин, особистих новин, красивого інспіруючого контенту… Діліться, що вас сьогодні радує?
Але є і хороше в цих днях: Британська податкова служба звинуватила лондонське відділення галереї Hauser & Wirth у порушенні кримінальних санкцій, які забороняють експорт предметів розкоші до Росії, через передачу картини Джорджа Кондо російському артколекціонерові.
Хто у Лондоні, беріть друзів і мчіть в Saatchi Gallery. Гарнючо-важливий експортний культурний продукт is now live!
https://futurespective.vogue.ua/futurespective/
А тепер подумайте про позитивний сценарій, в якому Україна повертає собі всі території. І починається процес реінтеграції. І враховуйте, що території це, в першу чергу, люди.
❤42💩24
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KyivFashionHell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 27 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
КЕЛЛЕР FM @kellerfm · 32,942 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 4 September 2026
Крезюме Вакансії @cresume · 51,637 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
НЕСЛУХ @ramina_channel · 25,033 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 September 2026
Гороскоп циганки Луладжі @lulagoroskop · 25,697 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
Digital masons @digital_masons · 24,061 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
Harley Quinn @harley_with_love · 30,333 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Гуд морнинг, Карл! @goodmorningkarl · 56,190 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Happy Monday @happymonday · 43,077 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
goodjob @findyourgoodjob · 43,911 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Київ Фешн Лавез” (@KyivFashionHell), 5,688 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KyivFashionHell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.