Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Так и ходи

Channel

Так и ходи

@freethecurls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

46,259subscribers

-80 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001123498120
TypeChannel
Username@freethecurls
Created28 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/freethecurls

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

46,25946,33946,2996 August 2026 — 46,339 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,338 subscribers7 August 2026 — 46,329 subscribers7 August 2026 — 46,333 subscribers8 August 2026 — 46,334 subscribers9 August 2026 — 46,338 subscribers11 August 2026 — 46,332 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,331 subscribers13 August 2026 — 46,316 subscribers15 August 2026 — 46,310 subscribers16 August 2026 — 46,301 subscribers18 August 2026 — 46,304 subscribers19 August 2026 — 46,289 subscribers20 August 2026 — 46,277 subscribers22 August 2026 — 46,265 subscribers24 August 2026 — 46,262 subscribers25 August 2026 — 46,259 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 19 days, net -80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,247–46,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 04:2346,259-3
24 Aug 2026, 02:2846,262-3
22 Aug 2026, 07:3746,265-12
20 Aug 2026, 21:4846,277-12
19 Aug 2026, 23:1446,289-15
18 Aug 2026, 22:5746,304+3
16 Aug 2026, 17:0746,301-9
15 Aug 2026, 05:2746,310-6
13 Aug 2026, 18:2846,316-15
12 Aug 2026, 14:4446,331-1
11 Aug 2026, 17:2246,332-6
9 Aug 2026, 17:5246,338+4
8 Aug 2026, 20:1446,334+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:1246,333+4
7 Aug 2026, 01:0646,329-9
6 Aug 2026, 03:4046,338-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:3646,339first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 46,259 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,630
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held44 (4 August 202624 August 2026)
Views total203,590
Reactions total4,765
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 24s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,765 reactions across 44 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,60054.6%
🔥80616.9%
😁2565.37%
🎉2324.87%
👍1433.00%
👀1242.60%
😢891.87%
😍881.85%
🤣701.47%
🤩591.24%
410.86%
🆒340.714%
💔340.714%
🙈280.588%
🤔230.483%
🤷210.441%
💯200.42%
😘200.42%
🤝150.315%
140.294%
12 further kinds481.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,765reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC≈2,860 views111 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

«Жгуты с бантами» Сложность: 7/10 — разделить волосы по центральному пробору отделить зону у лица, остальное собрать в хвосты силиконовыми резинками, — заплести зону у лица в косички и присоединить к хвостам — волосы из хвостов разделить на две части, каждую закрутить в правую сторону, — между собой жгуты закрутить в левую сторону, закрепить внизу резиночками

89🔥21👌1

24 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC≈2,770 views122 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

«Ретробаранки» Сложность: 4/10 — делим волосы на центральный пробор — заплетаем две косы — вплетаем на концах ленты — соединяем концы с основанием кос лентами, вяжем банты

99😁19🔥4

24 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC≈2,640 views112 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

«Хвост как у Арианы Гранде» Сложность: 2/10 — делим все волосы по центральному пробору — собираем обе части в два хвоста — объединяем оба хвоста в один — проворачиваем общий хвост внутрь себя в образовавшееся отверстие снизу вверх — затягиваем и расправляем

84🔥18😍4🤩3👍2💘1

24 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC≈2,770 views41 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Три прически на первое сентября, с одной справится даже дед Я не большой фанат косичек и корзиночек, но детская мода как вирус: если завелась в классе, то не отступит, пока все не переболеют. В один прекрасный день у вашего ребёнка может начаться мода на косички и банты, и придется освоить. Мы попросили Диану, нашего мастера по прическам, сделать тьюториалы к праздничным линейкам. Общие принципы: — Вам понадобятс

🔥2615

21 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈5,670 views200 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

Вот результат: сушила с диффузором минут 15-20

129🔥55👍7😘7👀2

21 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈4,560 views85 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Это гель-кастард, то есть у него действующий фиксирующий компонент — не синтетический полимер (PVP или акрилаты, как в большинстве гелей, которые вы видите на полках наших магазинов), а натуральные загустители, например, пектин или природные полисахариды как тут (Dehydroxanthan Gum). Еще вы могли встретить в кудрявых гелях Xanthan gum (ксантановую камедь). С одной стороны, это значит, что гель не будет вам сушить во

85

21 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈5,320 views96 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

Как я наношу гель для укладки

71🔥14👀7👍3💘1

21 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈4,190 views110 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Гель-кастард Boost Curl от Les Secrets de Loly Сегодня я тестирую гель французского кудрявого бренда Les Secrets de Loly. Когда вы видите незнакомый иностранный кудрявый бренд, погуглите, как выглядит его основательница — так вы поймёте, для какого типа волос она, прежде всего, создает свои баночки.

79🔥21💯10

21 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈4,830 views102 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

Как распутывать волосы с помощью кондиционера?

77🔥15👍5🤗5

20 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈5,280 views48 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Вот техника нанесения стайлинга для таких волос:

46🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈4,930 views99 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

#такиспроси #доипосле Вопрос: Почему мои кудри по длине разрозненны и каждая сама по себе? Что делать, чтобы вернуть плотность длине? Ответ: Так бывает, если густота по всей длине не однородна, то есть на концах, где волосы просвечивают, их меньше\они тоньше, чем у основания. Это может быть из-за нескольких причин: ⁃ Филировка\слайсинг — парикмахерские техники доработки стрижки, которые прорежают густоту волос, ⁃

82👍15🤩2

19 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈5,120 views103 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Я как-то писала, что уже несколько лет в категории ухода за волосами мы наблюдаем тренд на «скинификацию». Это когда hair-индустрия вдохновляется разработками уходовой косметики для лица и забирает в неё тренды и новые работающие ингредиенты (так, например, случилось с церамидами, с которыми мы сделали в этом году маску). Какого же было моё удивление, когда я увидела в Париже бутик австралийского бренда Kevin Murph

🔥6333👍6🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @freethecurls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@freethecurls edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 434,658 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бьюти суета
@klavagolman · 51,964
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Намочи манту
@namochimanturu · 56,724
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Так и ходи” (@freethecurls), 46,259 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freethecurls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.