Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,185–7,234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 17:16
7,198
+1
4 Nov 2026, 22:27
7,197
-4
1 Nov 2026, 18:58
7,201
-7
29 Oct 2026, 08:48
7,208
+2
26 Oct 2026, 12:46
7,206
+7
23 Oct 2026, 05:26
7,199
-5
20 Oct 2026, 13:00
7,204
+13
14 Oct 2026, 14:11
7,191
-3
11 Oct 2026, 10:00
7,194
-6
5 Oct 2026, 10:37
7,200
+2
27 Sept 2026, 17:59
7,198
-6
18 Sept 2026, 18:18
7,204
-6
14 Sept 2026, 08:38
7,210
+8
10 Sept 2026, 21:36
7,202
-14
5 Sept 2026, 13:41
7,216
-5
1 Sept 2026, 22:26
7,221
+1
29 Aug 2026, 23:43
7,220
+5
27 Aug 2026, 02:55
7,215
-6
24 Aug 2026, 05:35
7,221
-7
20 Aug 2026, 09:36
7,228
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.9%
avg views ÷ 7,198 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,230
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
39 (11 June 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
8,910
Reactions total
589
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 00:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,230
Videos
≈316
Links
≈51
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 26s
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,383 reactions across 38 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,077
48.2%
🔥
1,050
16.4%
🤣
698
10.9%
😁
508
7.96%
👍
395
6.19%
💔
179
2.80%
🏆
118
1.85%
😍
110
1.72%
💯
86
1.35%
🍾
47
0.736%
🍓
28
0.439%
🥰
25
0.392%
😭
17
0.266%
👏
16
0.251%
🎉
14
0.219%
🌚
6
0.094%
👌
4
0.063%
💋
3
0.047%
👻
1
0.016%
🤔
1
0.016%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,383 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 39 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @milkshakebabe1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Когда меня спрашивают, что самое сложное в профессии «мама дочек»- у меня моментально стираются из памяти разбросанные по дому лифчики/трусы/заколки, испачканные лаком для ногтей ковры, залапанные тогальником зеркала, изрезанные шмотки, фантики Рафаэлло под кроватями и так далее. Самое сложное в профессии «мама дочек»- расчесывать волосы своим принцессам. Да, каждое утро я завидую мамам мальчиков. И даже не пробуйте…
Потратить несколько часов на интервью Собчак с Сергеем Апполоновым и провести расследование, кто кем, кому и главное н@хуя приходится в этом вертепе- ало, у вас откуда столько времени?!❌
Сложить весь этот пазл за десять минут, листая мемы в инсте- устраивает ✅
Итак, заседание киноклуба начинается: я решила пройтись по классике и открыла для себя несколько фильмов, о которых даже не слышала:
✅ «Перекресток» 1994- фил…
Как я и предполагала, было сложно найти что-то «на вечер» после тех сериалов из предыдущего поста. Но я доверилась вашим рекомендациям, и они не подвели:
✅ «Пока смерть не разлучит нас» (Швеция, 2026)- мрачный, достаточно медленный, по-шведски атмосферный, стоит досмотреть до конца (спойлер: даже когда вроде бы и так понятно, что убийца- дворник)…. «Просто падажжи до последней серии».
✅ «Бухта вдов» 2026- фантастика,…
Пятница- это что?! Ага… правильно 🍿📽️
В последний раз вы мне накидали таких бриллиантов, из-за которых я уже неделю не сплю. Посмотрела 4 из них…. Погнали:
✅ «Яблоки никогда не падают» 2024- спокойный, вайбовый, бытовой…. Немного занудный в диалогах, но мне зашёл, как газировка с лимоном на утро после вечеринки.
✅ «все совпадения не случайны» 2024 - максимально в точку, когда я просила что-то триллерное с привкусом …
⬆️Я просто не могу открывать соцсети, сердце разрывается от новостей про истребление медведей (за денежное 🤦🏽♀️ вознаграждение), про вырубку лесов и заповедников гектарами, про диких животных, среду обитания которых просто стёрли в пыль и превратили в гигантскую строительную площадку…
Как никогда хочется стать адептом конспирологии и думать, что всё это неправда, такого просто не может быть, всё на самом деле не так…
Вам знакома ситуация, когда чешешь на работу, головка слегка приподнята, глаза немного опущены, плечи откинуты назад, грудь вперед, живот в себя, сзади всё подобрано, походка свободная от бедра, раскованная пластика пантеры перед прыжком…...но все вокруг прекрасно понимают, что ты спешишь в поликлинику.. ну или в райсполком?!
Походка/осанка- моя насущная проблема. У меня есть только две субличности:
✅гопник в оверсай…
Так… про самое главное я забыла (и никто не напомнил)… сейчас кину то, что посмотрела за это время. Спойлер: ничего хорошего🫠. Я как тот мужик с достаточно высокими стандартами и весьма неплохим вкусом, который никак не может встретить ту самую.. и поэтому от скуки мутит со всеми подряд…. (последнее время меня захватило кинобл@дство какое-то, извините).
Итак:
✅ «Осколки» 2026- очень красивый визуал и саундтреки… непе…
Не знаю, как все вокруг умудряются писать книги, снимать фильмы, собирать концертные залы со своими стендапами, продюсировать, мутить бизнесы, штамповать проекты по 20 штук в неделю, что-то там продавать, какие-то семинары проводить и всё такое… Пора бы уже признать, что самый идеальный план на осень- это лежать на диване в бежевом тренче, закатив глаза на 180 градусов и выбирать, какое блюдо из тыквы сегодня пригото…
«Девушка, извините, а что у вас за парфюм? Иду за Вами, не могу надышаться»- именно это я слышу, когда «надеваю» что-нибудь из коллекции SOLEM. Не знаю, какие нарк@тики содержатся в этих заветных бутылёчках, но шею сворачивает у всех. Все ароматы подробно описала здесь.
Пусть осень станет временем волшебства, и кто-то из вас получит в подарок эту желанную красную бархатную коробочку! Просто так, потому что «ты этого …
Извините, не выходила в соцсети… смотрела сериал, который просто ЛУЧШИЙ из последнего, что я видела…. Наш… российский…Матушка-Земля, что ж ты творишь?!
✅ ХОЛОД 2026…..
Как сказал бы Станиславский «это разъёб».
PS. Смотрели?! Как вам концовка?!
🔥92❤37
Signed Milkshakebabe
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @milkshakebabe1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @milkshakebabe1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
19 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Собачий Потрох @sobachkyn_potroh · 47,389 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
Diana_life @diana_recepti1 · 42,608 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Milkshakebabe” (@milkshakebabe1), 7,198 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milkshakebabe1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.