4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,911–1,918 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 19:17
1,917
+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:16
1,915
+3
7 Aug 2026, 15:17
1,912
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:50
1,912
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 26 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 1,917 subscribers
Avg views / post
315
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
16 (26 October 2025 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
3,461
Reactions total
210
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
258 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
161
62.4%
👍
67
26.0%
😁
9
3.49%
😢
4
1.55%
😱
3
1.16%
🥰
3
1.16%
🌚
2
0.775%
🐳
2
0.775%
👏
2
0.775%
🔥
2
0.775%
👎
1
0.388%
🤣
1
0.388%
🤮
1
0.388%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 258reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
طبق گزارش اخیر رصدخانه خشکسالی اروپا (EDO) بحران کمآبی و جریانهای رودخانهای پایین در سراسر این قاره گسترش یافته
اینطوری نیست که خشکسالی فقط خاک و محصولات کشاورزی رو تحت تاثیر قرار داده باشه بلکه رودخانهها، کشتیرانی، زنجیرههای تامین، تولید انرژی و تامین آب رو هم تحتالشعاع قرار داده.
آخرین دادهها نشان میدن شرایط سطح آب پایین در کوریدورهای اصلی و قابل کشتیرانی اروپا (مانند رودخانههای راین، لوار، دانوب و پو) و …
خیلیها فکر میکنند فقط مروارید طبیعی، مروارید واقعی است؛ اما این یک باور اشتباه است!
مرواریدهای پرورشی هم کاملا واقعی هستند و توسط صدف تولید میشوند. تنها تفاوت این است که فرآیند تشکیل آنها با کمک انسان آغاز میشود، نه بهصورت کاملا طبیعی.
از طرف دیگر، تستهای معروفی مثل تست دندان یا بررسی ظاهر، فقط میتوانند سرنخهایی به شما بدهند و بهتنهایی برای تشخیص اصالت کافی نیستند. اگر ارزش مروارید برایتان مهم است، بهترین…
چه جالب
با اینکه آواز پرندگان در سراسر دنیا بسیار متنوع به نظر میرسه، این تنوع در واقع از ترکیب فقط ۸ نوع صدای اصلی به وجود اومده و محیط زندگی هم تأثیر زیادی روی شکل نهایی این آوازها داره.
یه پژوهش جدید که در مجله Science منتشر شده و بیش از ۱۱۶ هزار آواز پرنده رو بررسی کرده، نشان داده که با وجود تنوع شگفتانگیز آواز پرندگان گنجشکسان (Passerines)، همه این آوازها از تنها هشت الگوی صوتی پایه ساخته شدهاند؛ الگوهایی…
ستونهای سنگی دریاچه کرالی (Crowley Lake) در کالیفرنیا یکی از نادرترین پدیدههای زمینشناسی جهان هستن. سالها منشا اونا یک معما بود، اما پژوهشگران در سال ۲۰۱۵ توضیح قانعکنندهای برای شکلگیریشون ارائه کردن.
گویا یک فوران آتشفشانی عظیم
حدود ۷۶۰ هزار سال پیش رخ میده و لایهای ضخیم از خاکستر و سنگ آتشفشانی داغ (توف) رو روی منطقه پخش میکنه.
پس از فوران، آب حاصل از ذوب برف به داخل این خاکستر داغ نفوذ میکنه. وق…
ترجیح میدید توسط کدوم یکی بلعیده بشید؟ یه کوسه یا یه سیاهچاله؟
من ترجیح میدم توسط یه سیاهچاله بلعیده بشم!
کسی چه میدونه؟ شاید آن سوی افق رویداد، دروازهای به یه جهان موازی یا کدی گمشده در دل کهکشانها پنهان شده باشه. در حالی که سرنوشتِ درونِ شکم یه کوسه کاملا مشخص و به دور از هیجان کیهانیه!
@sayareye_ma
sayareyema.com
سیاره ما رو در اینستاگرام هم دنبال کنید 👇
https://www.instagram.com/sayareye.ma
پشههای ناقل بیماری اکنون به مناطقی در اروپا، آسیا، قاره آمریکا و استرالیا گسترش یافتن که قبلا از وجود اونا در امان بودن.
تغییرات اقلیمی باعث شده برخی مناطق نسبت به گذشته برای زندگی و تکثیر پشهها مناسبتر بشن. گرمتر شدن هوا و طولانیتر شدن دورههای بارندگی در طول سال، به این حشرات زمان بیشتری میده تا در مناطق جدید مستقر بشن و بیماریها رو گسترش بدن.
همچنین، پشههای زنده میتونن با خودروها، قطارها و هواپیماها جابه…
هر سنگ، شناسنامه و ساختار خودش رو داره؛ از کانیها و ویژگیهای فیزیکی اون گرفته تا تاریخچهای که پشت سر گذاشته
این دستگاه جالب، از ساختار سطحی سنگها استفاده میکنه و اون رو تبدیل به یک ملودی میکنه
کدوم سنگ به نظرتون صدای بهتری داره؟
@sayareye_ma
sayareyema.com
سیاره ما رو در اینستاگرام هم دنبال کنید 👇
https://www.instagram.com/sayareye.ma
اگر بگویم زمین هر ۲۶ ثانیه یکبار میلرزه، باور میکنی؟
فکر میکنی زمین کاملا ساکنه؟
پژوهشگرا سیگنالی لرزهای رو ثبت کردن که تقریبا هر ۲۶ ثانیه تکرار میشه.
این «تپش قلب زمین» نیست…
بلکه ارتعاشی بسیار ضعیفه که فقط لرزهنگارهای حساس اونو ثبت میکنن
احتمالا این پدیده از برخورد امواج اقیانوس با بستر دریا ایجاد میشه؛
پدیدهای واقعی که هنوز همه جزئیاتش برای دانشمندان روشن نیست
@sayareye_ma
sayareyema.com
سیاره ما رو د…
سلام و درود خدمت دوستان پیج سیاره ما 🌍
مدتهاست که نتونستم مثل قبل کنار شما باشم. متاسفانه روزهای سختی رو پشت سر گذاشتیم
فقط خواستم از ته دل ازتون تشکر کنم که با وجود این غیبت، پیج رو ترک نکردید و اینجا موندید. این همراهی شما برام خیلی ارزشمنده.
امیدوارم از این به بعد دوباره مثل قبل با انرژی برگردم و بتونم محتوایی که لایق حمایت شماست رو باهاتون به اشتراک بذارم 🙏
دانشجویان دکترا در کجا خوشحالتر هستن و بیشترین رضایت رو دارن؟
بر اساس نظرسنجی جهانی Nature در سال ۲۰۲۵، کشورهایی که در اونها دانشجویان دکترا بیشترین رضایت رو داشتن عبارتند از برزیل، استرالیا و ایتالیا. کشورهای شمال اروپا هم با ۸۵٪ رضایت در مجموع در رتبه بالایی بودن.
اما چه عواملی با رضایت بالاتر دانشجویان دکترا مرتبط بودن؟
اینکه دانشجو حداقل یک ساعت در هفته با استاد راهنماش جلسه داشته باشه و کار نکردن بیش از حد و…
❤6👍6🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sayareye_ma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
طبق نظرسنجیها، فکر میکنید در کدوم کشورها دانشجویان دکترا بیشترین رضایت رو دارن؟
آمریکا، چین و آلمان29%
برزیل، استرالیا و ایتالیا25%
ژاپن، کره، فرانسه27%
کانادا، انگلیس، هند19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 414,254 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌍 سیاره ما” (@sayareye_ma), 1,917 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sayareye_ma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.