Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +286. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,953–12,333 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 20:17
12,289
+57
18 Sept 2026, 15:37
12,232
+4
16 Sept 2026, 06:16
12,228
+10
14 Sept 2026, 13:38
12,218
+4
13 Sept 2026, 03:18
12,214
+70
11 Sept 2026, 08:19
12,144
+37
8 Sept 2026, 17:01
12,107
+7
5 Sept 2026, 09:35
12,100
+6
3 Sept 2026, 16:17
12,094
+2
2 Sept 2026, 11:06
12,092
+1
1 Sept 2026, 11:48
12,091
+8
31 Aug 2026, 15:04
12,083
+4
30 Aug 2026, 11:55
12,079
+2
29 Aug 2026, 10:28
12,077
+5
28 Aug 2026, 08:25
12,072
+5
27 Aug 2026, 10:38
12,067
+7
26 Aug 2026, 11:14
12,060
+7
25 Aug 2026, 12:27
12,053
-7
24 Aug 2026, 14:56
12,060
+1
22 Aug 2026, 23:35
12,059
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
381 reactions across 23 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
130
34.1%
👍
82
21.5%
🔥
59
15.5%
🤣
58
15.2%
💔
31
8.14%
💩
7
1.84%
🤬
5
1.31%
👏
2
0.525%
🖕
2
0.525%
😁
2
0.525%
❤🔥
1
0.262%
🌭
1
0.262%
😐
1
0.262%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @securation. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
یه ضربالمثل چینی میگه:
کسی که دیگران رو مقصر میدونه راه زیادی در پیش داره.
کسی که خودش رو مقصر میدونه نصف راه رو رفته.
کسی که هیچکس رو مقصر نمیدونه رسیده.
آدما اغلب از «متهم شدن» و «ناکافی بودن» میترسن. به همین خاطر، وقتی با مشکلی روبهرو میشن، ناخودآگاه دنبال این میگردن که بندازنش گردن یکی دیگه. توی تیمهایی که فرهنگ سرزنش وجود داره، انرژی آدمها بهجای حل مسئله صرف پیدا کردن مقصر میشه: «فلانی انجام نداد…
⭕️ مقالهٔ تازهای که روی core-jmp منتشر شده، روایت جالبی از مهندسی معکوس یک روتکیت کرنلمد ویندوز دارد.
نویسنده در ابتدا نمونهای را به اشتباه Cobalt Strike Beacon تشخیص داده، اما پس از بررسی عمیقتر مشخص میشود که با یک درایور Ring 0 به نام SakDriver روبرو هستیم.
آنچه در این مقاله جلب توجه میکند، ترکیب چند لایهٔ پنهانکاری است: از غیرفعالسازی ETW و مخفیسازی فرآیندها با DKOM گرفته تا پنهانسازی پورت C2 از طریق هو…
⭕️یه مرد استرالیایی به اسم Andrew از دستیار هوش مصنوعی خودش خواسته بود تا براش یه کلاس تو باشگاه رزرو کنه، اما هوش مصنوعی خیلی فراتر از انتظارش عمل کرد. این دستیار که با برنامه OpenClaw و هوش مصنوعی Claude کار میکرد، یه باگ امنیتی تو سیستم رزرو باشگاه پیدا کرد چون سیستم هیچ بررسی برای تایید هویت نداشت. به همین خاطر هوش مصنوعی نه تنها کلاسها رو برای ماهها بعد رزرو کرد، بلکه وقتی Andrew ازش خواست جایگاهش رو تو لیست …
⭕️آسیبپذیری ۱۳ ساله OVSwrap (CVE-2026-64531) میتواند به کاربران لوکال بدون دسترسی ویژه اجازه دهد از طریق Open vSwitch در سیستمهای آسیبپذیر، به سطح دسترسی root برسند.
همچنین Poc منتشر شده شامل offset های مربوط به حدود ۸۰۰ build از Linux kernel با معماری x86-64 است.
#Linux #Kernel #openvswitch
@securation
⭕️ تکنیک GhostTree که توسط Varonis Threat Labs مستندسازی شده، از NTFS Reparse Points بهویژه Directory Junctions برای ایجاد Recursive Loops در ساختار فایلسیستم سوءاستفاده میکند. عامل تهدید بدون نیاز به Admin Privileges و صرفاً با Write Access، اقدام به ایجاد Junction هایی مینماید که به Parent Directory خود ارجاع میدهند؛ با ساختار GhostTree و دو Junction فرزند در هر سطح، درختی با 2^126 مسیر منحصربهفرد شکل میگی…
⭕️ تحلیل تکنیک Process Parameter Poisoning (P3) ارائهشده از SensePost/Orange Cyberdefense، یک برداشت مفهومی نوین در تزریق پروسه ویندوز است. در این رویکرد، مهاجم بهجای زنجیره کلاسیک VirtualAllocEx → WriteProcessMemory → CreateRemoteThread`، از پارامترهای استارتاپ تابع `CreateProcessW — شامل lpCommandLine`، `lpEnvironment و فیلد غیرمستند lpReserved در ساختار STARTUPINFOW که به ShellInfo از نوع UNICODE_STRING در RTL…
⭕️ هشدار | بهرهبرداری فعال از آسیبپذیری 0day در Cisco FMC
مهاجمان در حال سوءاستفاده از آسیبپذیری Zero-Day با شناسه CVE-2026-20316 در Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) هستند.
این آسیبپذیری به مهاجمان از راه دور و بدون نیاز به احراز هویت اجازه میدهد با استفاده از اعتبارنامههای ثابت (Static Credentials) به یک حساب کاربری با سطح دسترسی پایین وارد شده و به اطلاعات حساس سیستم دسترسی پیدا کنند.
شرکت Cisco هشد…
⭕️ آسیب پذیری Unauthenticated File Upload RCE
یک آسیبپذیری بحرانی در کامپوننت RSFiles! (com_rsfiles) برای Joomla با شناسه CVE-2026-57827 منتشر شده است.
این نقص از نوع Unauthenticated File Upload بوده و به مهاجم اجازه میدهد بدون نیاز به احراز هویت , فایل دلخواه خود را روی سرور آپلود کند.
ریشه آسیبپذیری، Split-Controller Upload Bypass است که منجر به دور زدن کنترلهای امنیتی فرآیند آپلود شده و در نهایت امکان نوشتن…
⭕️ آسیبپذیری جدید و پرخطر در 7-Zip امکان اجرای کد مخرب را فراهم میکند.
یک آسیبپذیری تازه با شناسه CVE-2026-14266 در نرمافزار 7-Zip افشا شده است که میتواند به هکرها اجازه دهد با فریب کاربر برای باز کردن یک فایل XZ دستکاریشده، کد دلخواه خود را روی سیستم اجرا کنند.
این نقص امنیتی از نوع Heap Overflow در ماژول پردازش فایلهای XZ است و شدت آن بالا (High Severity) ارزیابی شده است.
در صورت موفقیت حمله، کد مخرب با هما…
⭕️ یک آسیبپذیری Race Condition در سرویس Secondary Logon ویندوز، امکان دور زدن PPL و استخراج اعتبارنامهها از LSASS را بدون دسترسی مستقیم فراهم میکند.
در این حمله، مهاجم با دستکاری فیلد ClientId در ساختار TEB برای جعل شناسه فرآیند فراخواننده، و استفاده از OpLock بر روی فایل اجرایی هدف برای گسترش پنجره زمانی Race Condition، سرویس seclogon را فریب میدهد تا handleهایی با دسترسیهای PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE، PROCESS_CREATE_…
👍9❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @securation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کالی بویز | ترفند | تکنولوژی @Kaliboys · 28,748 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
Black Security Team @Black_Security · 63,917 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
خبرگزاری سایبربان| Cyberban News @cyberbannews_ir · 109,325 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
آموزش شبكه و امنيت @denait · 21,300 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Λ/Organizaτiοn @AOrgan · 47,423 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
Hide01 @Hide01 · 35,428 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 2 September 2026
🔗 Join in RedBlueTM 🎩 @RedBlueTM · 21,371 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 23 September 2026
P4CK PUB @p4ck_pub · 21,487 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 23 September 2026
وب آموز @webamoozir · 116,272 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Anonymous OpIran @anonopiran · 20,657 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 September 2026
پکیج رایگان | پابلیک پکیج | اموزش رایگان | Free learning @faketic · 23,390 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 September 2026
Full Package | فول پکیج @FullPackage · 29,196 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
آموزش کامپیوتر @amuzesh_computer · 41,403 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
جادی پایتون | Jadi Python fans @jadi_fans · 43,699 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 August 2026
جادی | Jadi @jadivarlog · 103,048 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
مای سکیور | Mysecure @mysecure1 · 29,874 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
The Hacker News @thehackernews · 164,155 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
Python Forever @PythonForever · 130,985 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
شبکه کاران @shabake_karan · 25,586 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
شبکه و امنیت،تکنولوژی،هوش مصنوعی @Netwo0rk · 53,013 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
Learn Python @learnpy · 21,523 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
DLeX: AI Python @ai_python · 21,397 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
FaraDars | فرادرس @faradars · 61,413 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
مرکز آموزش کامپیوتر @AmoozeshWebsite · 96,193 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Security Analysis” (@securation), 12,289 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/securation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.