8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,731–20,820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 06:19
20,741
-16
12 Aug 2026, 09:23
20,757
-15
11 Aug 2026, 10:43
20,772
-8
10 Aug 2026, 11:38
20,780
-17
9 Aug 2026, 08:31
20,797
-3
8 Aug 2026, 11:15
20,800
-10
7 Aug 2026, 18:45
20,810
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:34
20,810
first reading
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
38.9%
avg views ÷ 20,741 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,080
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
77 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
613,820
Reactions total
16,648
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 57s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,648 reactions across 76 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
5,358
32.2%
👍
4,763
28.6%
❤
3,927
23.6%
👌
699
4.20%
😐
417
2.50%
👎
411
2.47%
🔥
354
2.13%
💔
209
1.26%
👏
164
0.985%
🤬
138
0.829%
✍
129
0.775%
😭
58
0.348%
🕊
13
0.078%
🥰
8
0.048%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,648reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 76 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @overlordechokilo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://t.me/netgovpn
سرویس پرسرعت:
10 گیگ
95 هزار تومان
20 گیگ
هزارتومان 190
30 گیگ
هزارتومان 270
حجمی بیش از 30 گیگ:
گیگی 9 هزار تومان
500 آفری ویژه:
گیگ
هزارتومان 520
سفارش این سرویس از ربات و آیدی فروش در تلگرام:
@VpnNetGo_bot
@NetGovpn1
https://t.me/netgovpn
سرویس مناسب دانلود سنگین:
200 گیگ
270 هزار تومان
حجمی مستقیم بیش از 200 گیگ:
گیگی 4 هزار تومان
سفارش این سرویس از طریق آیدی فروش بات و پیوی:
@NetGovpn…
این موضوع بنزین 87000 تومبانی کوچکترین چیزی هست که از اثر محاصره خواهیم دید، همونطور که بارها تاکید کردم، در این مرحله، جنگ هیچ کاربردی نداره، قدرت محاصره و ردیابی اقتصادی چند صد برابر اثرگذار هست.
البته تقریبا 1 سال پیش گفتم و تازه مقامات گروهک جمهوری اسلامی و حتی خود ترامپ داره به این موضوع اذعان می کنند.
@daneshagahi
هنوز یاد نگرفتید که با اخبار
سنجش تاب آوری جامعه رو انجام میدن؟
بنزین ۷۸ هزار تومانی در کرمان؟!
دارن تست میکنن ببینن شما تا کجا تاب آوری دارید...
ضمن اینکه قیمت واقعی بنزین در حال حاضر لیتری ۲۵۰ هزارتومان است...
#shantia
پیام مخاطبین :
سلام آقای شنتیا وقت شما بخیر! پرسشی دارم امیدوارم در این زمینه من رو راهنمایی کنید
بعد از ماجرای حمیدرضا رجبزاده، موجی در فضای مجازی شکل گرفته که خواستار برخورد شدیدتر و حتی مجازاتهای سنگینتر با مردم مخالف جمهوری اسلامی و جریان براندازیه. اتفاقی که به نظر من، فارغ از اینکه عامل یا طراح اون چه کسی بوده، میتونه پیامدهای بسیار خطرناکی برای آینده جامعه ایران داشته باشه.
از نگاه من، بعید به نظر میرسه…
معرفی تسلیحات نیروی زمینی ارتش توسط امیرسرتیپ کیومرث حیدری(فرمانده اسبق نیروزمینی ارتش).
حتی یک مورد از تسلیحات نیروهای تحت فرماندهی خودش رو درست نمیگه😐
ایشون جانشین رئیس ستاد کل نیروهای مسلح شدن.
بعد یه عده میگن اگه زمینی بهمون حمله کنن تارو مار میشن.
خب نیروی زمینی که آخرین فرمانده ش اینقدر بیسواده چطور ازش انتظار پیروزی داشته باشیم؟
ویدئو از کانال جنگاوران
#overlord
کره جنوبی و ژاپن اعلام کردهاند که گزارشهایی مبنی بر پرتاب یک موشک بالیستیک توسط کره شمالی وجود دارد.
پ.ن:
چیز جدیدی نیست هرازگاهی کره شمالی یه موشک تست میکنه که تو آب های سایر کشورها فرود میاد.
اما اینبار گویا محل پیش بینی شده برای فرودش فاصله نزدیکی با ساحل ژاپن داره.
#overlord
بیانیه سنتکام:
صبح امروز، نیروهای سنتکام (فرماندهی مرکزی ایالات متحده) سیستم فرماندهی کشتی باری "ویلا نوا" که پرچم پاناما را داشته، را از کار انداختند. این کشتی در حال عبور از خلیج عمان بود و قصد داشت با حرکت به سمت یک بندر ایران، محاصره ایالات متحده علیه ایران را نقض کند.
یک بالگردهای MH-60 متعلق به نیروی دریایی ایالات متحده، پس از آنکه خدمه غیرنظامی کشتی، هشدارهای مکرر نیروهای آمریکایی را نادیده گرفتند، دو موشک "…
نوشته شده در اکانت سنتکام:
آیا میدانستید که فرماندهی مرکزی ایالات متحده (CENTCOM) در دهه ۱۹۸۰ میلادی تأسیس شد؟ انقلاب اسلامی ایران و اشغال افغانستان توسط اتحاد جماهیر شوروی، رئیسجمهور جیمی کارتر را بر آن داشت تا در مارس ۱۹۸۰، نیروی مشترک واکنش سریع (RDJTF) را تأسیس کند. این اقدام با هدف ایجاد یک نیروی انعطافپذیر برای حفاظت از منافع ایالات متحده در خاورمیانه انجام شد. با درک ضرورت حضور پایدارتر، رئیسجمهور رونالد ر…
❤93👍22😁6👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @overlordechokilo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@overlordechokilo edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 321,950 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Overlord” (@overlordechokilo), 20,741 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/overlordechokilo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.