Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تنیدگی

@tanidegi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,709subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001411050603
TypeChannel
Username@tanidegi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tanidegi

Growth

11,70911,72311,7166 August 2026 — 11,721 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,721 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,720 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,723 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,720 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,717 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,710 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,709 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,707–11,725 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:2811,709-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:0511,710-7
10 Aug 2026, 10:5211,717-3
8 Aug 2026, 09:0811,720-3
7 Aug 2026, 11:3311,723+3
6 Aug 2026, 14:2411,720-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:1511,721no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:0911,721first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 16 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 11,709 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held21 (16 April 20249 August 2026)
Views total4,950
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 29m
Average length
4m 29s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,960 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
65233.3%
👍63132.2%
👏20210.3%
🔥1588.06%
👌1005.10%
👎914.64%
🤔743.78%
❤‍🔥201.02%
🤯100.51%
🕊40.204%
😁40.204%
🥰40.204%
💯30.153%
🤩30.153%
😱20.102%
🤣20.102%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,960reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2024 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC≈1,410 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

طراحی هوشمند . با توضیحات دکتر #استیون_نوولا، عصب‌شناس . Credit: theskepticsguide YouTube channel . @tanidegi

18👍5👎2👌1

21 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC≈3,540 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

طراحی DNA . با توضیحات دکتر #استیون_نوولا، عصب‌شناس . Credit: theskepticsguide YouTube channel . #DNA #طراحی_هوشمند #خلقت #علم @tanidegi

38👍4👎3👏2

8 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC≈6,930 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

بزرگترین سوال . گفتگوی دکتر #شان_کارول فیزیکدان نظری و #پیرز_مورگان . #بیگ_بنگ #کیهان_شناسی #علم

79👎6👏5❤‍🔥2🕊2

22 Aug 2025, 13:14 UTC≈13,400 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ایمان دینی، عقلانی یا عقلانی‌سازی با توضیحات #جولین_بجینی، فیلسوف . Credit: Closer to truth YouTube channel . #دین #ایمان #مذهب #جولین_بجینی #عقلانیت #علم @tanidegi

48👏5👍4👎3👌1

26 Jun 2025, 18:27 UTC≈15,400 views128 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

جهان تنظیم شده؟ . برشی کوتاه از گفتگوی #گراهام_آپی و #ریچارد_سویینبرن . Credit: Friction YouTube channel #فلسفه #خدا #تنظیم_شدگی @tanidegi

👌70👎2317👍16👏2

6 Jun 2025, 15:16 UTC≈15,300 views117 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

آیا خدا واجب‌الوجود است؟ . با توضیحات #بید_راندل، فیلسوف Credit: Closer to truth YouTube channel . #فلسفه #متافیزیک #خدا #واجب‌_الوجود #برهان_هستی_شناختی #برهان_وجودی #انسلم @tanidegi

👏59👍2514👎12🤔7

5 Apr 2025, 11:35 UTC≈15,600 views137 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

چرا؟ @tanidegi

🤔6034👌15👍10🤯7❤‍🔥3🕊2🤩2

30 Mar 2025, 15:25 UTC≈14,900 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

فواصل فضایی . با توضیح، #نیل_دگراس_تایسون، اخترفیزیکدان Credit: GeoQuest YouTube channel . #فضا #ایستگاه_فضایی #نیل_تایسون #مریخ #ماه #اخترفیزیک @tanidegi

60👍32

29 Mar 2025, 16:09 UTC≈16,200 views177 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

سواد علمی . با توضیحات #نیل_دگراس_تایسون، اخترفیزیکدان . Credit: Don Lemon YouTube channel . #علم #مدرن #خرافات #نیل_تایسون @tanidegi

👏98👍32👎2015👌7🤔4🤣1

25 Oct 2024, 14:03 UTC≈18,200 views106 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#سحابی آب‌سنگ کیهانی Cosmic reef @tanidegi

84👍17🔥4🤩1

30 Aug 2024, 16:59 UTC≈19,400 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

خورشیدهای نامیـرا . کیفیت 360 . Credit: Melodysheep YouTube channel . #ستاره_های_نامیرا #اخترشناسی #اخترفیزیک #ماده_تاریک #سیاهچاله #کیهان_شناسی #فوزبال @tanidegi

🔥41👍2211

30 Aug 2024, 16:58 UTC≈16,700 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

خورشیدهای نامیـرا . کیفیت 720 . Credit: Melodysheep YouTube channel . #ستاره_های_نامیرا #اخترشناسی #اخترفیزیک #ماده_تاریک #سیاهچاله #کیهان_شناسی #فوزبال @tanidegi

🔥39👍138

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @tanidegi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 115,658 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Radio Relax
@RadioRelax · 331,376
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تنیدگی” (@tanidegi), 11,709 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanidegi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.