Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 43 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,700–11,753 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 01:38
11,741
-3
15 Sept 2026, 19:41
11,744
-2
14 Sept 2026, 01:01
11,746
+1
12 Sept 2026, 11:18
11,745
-2
10 Sept 2026, 05:16
11,747
+1
7 Sept 2026, 02:17
11,746
+7
4 Sept 2026, 13:41
11,739
+4
2 Sept 2026, 21:36
11,735
-4
1 Sept 2026, 21:15
11,739
-4
30 Aug 2026, 20:38
11,743
+1
29 Aug 2026, 22:54
11,742
+1
28 Aug 2026, 19:26
11,741
+3
27 Aug 2026, 16:28
11,738
+10
25 Aug 2026, 15:24
11,728
-7
24 Aug 2026, 15:27
11,735
+8
22 Aug 2026, 22:58
11,727
+6
21 Aug 2026, 14:48
11,721
+5
19 Aug 2026, 16:28
11,716
+5
18 Aug 2026, 16:43
11,711
+5
17 Aug 2026, 18:23
11,706
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 16 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 11,741 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
34 (16 April 2024 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
5,460
Reactions total
99
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 55m
Average length
3m 31s
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,591 reactions across 34 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,039
40.1%
👍
748
28.9%
👏
227
8.76%
🔥
190
7.33%
👌
120
4.63%
👎
107
4.13%
🤔
78
3.01%
😁
28
1.08%
❤🔥
22
0.849%
🤯
10
0.386%
🤩
6
0.232%
💯
4
0.154%
🕊
4
0.154%
🥰
4
0.154%
😱
2
0.077%
🤣
2
0.077%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,591 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2024 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تا پایان زمان _ ذهن، ماده و کنکاش ما برای معنا در جهانی در حال تحول
.
مصاحبه با پروفسور #برایان_گرین، فیزیکدان نظری
Credit: Talks at Google YouTube Channel
.
در این مصاحبه، پروفسور برایان گرین در مورد مباحثی که در کتابش "تا پایان زمان" ذکر کرده است، صحبت میکند؛
از بیگبنگ تا آیندهی دوردست و فروپاشی نهایی ماده، کنکاش انسان برای جایگاهش در جهان، نقش هنر و دین در فرگشت انسان، آزادی اراده، آگاهی، تقابل آنتروپی و گرانش و…
اختراع انسان
با توضیحات پروفسور #برایان_گرین، ریاضیدان و فیزیکدان نظری
Credit: The Diary Of A CEO and World Science Festival YouTube channel
#خدا #دین #انسان #معنا
.
@tanidegi
مستند علمی "آینده انسان"
مدت زمان: ۳۱ دقیقه
کیفیت Full HD
زیرنویس فارسی چسبیده
۲۸۵ هزار تومان
برای تهیه این مستند به دایرکت @tanidegi_pv پیام بدین
برای تماشای برشهایی از این مستند، روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید و اطلاعات بیشتر رو هم مطالعه کنید.
https://t.me/tanidegi/1324?single
.
@tanidegi
#هتل_هیلبرت
هتلی با بینهایت اتاق که برای همه، جا ندارد!
.
Credit: Veritasium YouTube Channel
#تنیدگی_هتل_هیلبرت_ورتاسیوم
.
آزمایشهای ذهنی فقط محدود به فیزیک نظری نیستند، بلکه در حیطه #ریاضیات هم گاهی مطرح میشوند که یکی از معروفترین آنها هتل هیلبرت است که توسط ریاضیدان معروف #دیوید_هیلبرت مطرح شد تا پیچیدگی درک بینهایت و تفاوت بینهایتها را نشان دهد.
البته اثبات #بینهایت در ریاضیات دستاورد ریاضیدانی دیگر به نا…
معدن اصلی طلا
.
با توضیحات دکتر #برایان_کاکس، فیزیکدان
.
همانطور که میدانیم فرآیند همجوشی هستهای در هستهی ستارگان فعال، محل شکلگیری عناصر است اما در چنین مکانی دما و فشار فقط توان تولید عناصری تا جرم آهن را دارد و شرایط برای ایجاد عناصری با جرم بیشتر در آن مهیا نیست.
اما در کیهان رویدادهایی به مراتب داغتر و پرفشارتر هم وجود دارند، از جمله انفجاری فوق شدید حاصل از برخورد ستارگان نوترونی(کیلونوا) که یک نمونهی خو…
❤46👍9🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @tanidegi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Science Documentaries مستندهای علمی @Documentary20 · 23,094 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
SUPERNOOVA™ @SuperNoova · 43,701 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
🕊 فرازتد⚡️(روشنگری) @FarazTed · 20,586 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 September 2026
دانش، آگاهی @daneshagahi · 28,319 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Instrumentallist (موزیک لایت) @instrumentallist · 30,994 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
کانال علمی بیگ بنگ @big_bangpage · 39,158 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
خوانش کتاب برای انسان خردمند @homosapiensfa · 43,950 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
پادکست جافِكری @jafekri · 41,175 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
کتابهای ممنوعه @ketab_mamnouee · 78,681 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Radio Relax @RadioRelax · 327,183 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تنیدگی” (@tanidegi), 11,741 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanidegi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.