ویدیوها و مطالب جذاب از زبان اندیشمندان جهان برای علاقهمندان به مفاهیم علمی و فلسفی
پیج اینستاگرام ما:
👇
پیج اول (تنیدگی):
https://www.instagram.com/tanidegi/
پیج دوم (درهمتنیدگی)
https://instagram.com/darhamtanidegi?u
ارتباط با ما: @tanidegi_pv
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,700–11,755 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 08:48
11,736
+6
8 Nov 2026, 22:41
11,730
-3
7 Nov 2026, 12:05
11,733
-3
6 Nov 2026, 14:07
11,736
-1
4 Nov 2026, 15:45
11,737
-1
3 Nov 2026, 13:47
11,738
-5
2 Nov 2026, 11:09
11,743
+1
1 Nov 2026, 14:21
11,742
+1
31 Oct 2026, 11:58
11,741
-2
30 Oct 2026, 09:30
11,743
-1
28 Oct 2026, 08:06
11,744
+2
27 Oct 2026, 04:40
11,742
+1
26 Oct 2026, 07:57
11,741
+2
25 Oct 2026, 09:16
11,739
-2
24 Oct 2026, 07:45
11,741
+5
23 Oct 2026, 04:50
11,736
+1
22 Oct 2026, 01:49
11,735
+3
20 Oct 2026, 21:31
11,732
-1
19 Oct 2026, 20:27
11,733
-3
18 Oct 2026, 22:20
11,736
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 16 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.2%
avg views ÷ 11,736 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
57 (16 April 2024 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
22,750
Reactions total
299
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 09:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
205
Videos
808
Links
72
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7h 49m
Average length
8m 23s
Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,618 reactions across 57 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,757
48.6%
👍
882
24.4%
👏
250
6.91%
🔥
250
6.91%
👌
133
3.68%
👎
110
3.04%
🤔
81
2.24%
❤🔥
76
2.10%
😁
30
0.829%
🥰
12
0.332%
🤯
11
0.304%
🤩
7
0.193%
💯
6
0.166%
🕊
6
0.166%
🤣
4
0.111%
😱
3
0.083%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,618 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2024 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (37.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
فیزیکِ مرگ
.
با توضیحات #شان_کارول، فیزیکدان نظری
Credit: FFRF YouTube Channel
.
توی زمان 10:40 به یک مناظره ارجاع میده که لینکشو این پایین میذارم. بسیار جذابه این مناظره برای کسایی که ندیدن:
https://t.me/tanidegi/1519
رو این لینک کلیک کنید 👆
@tanidegi
مناظره: آیا #آگاهی بنیادی است؟
#پانسایکیسم در مقابل #فیزیکالیسم
با توضیحات #شان_کارول و #فیلیپ_گاف
.
فایل یه تیکه و کامل مناظره همراه با بخشی از پرسش و پاسخها
.
Credit: Mind Chat YouTube Channel
.
#ذهن #فلسفه_ذهن #فلسفه #فیلیپ_گاف
@tanidegi
قضایای گودل در فیزیک #کوانتوم؟
با توضیحات دکتر #شان_کارول، فیلسوف و فیزیکدان نظری
Credit: Sean Carroll YouTube channel
#گودل #قضایای_گودل #ریاضیات #قضیه_ناتمامیت_گودل
@tanidegi
مناظره: آیا مرگ، مقصد نهایی است؟
.
یه مناظرهی مفصل راجع به تجربیات نزدیک به مرگ (NDE) که توی این ویدیو برخی از شواهد و نقد اونها رو هم میتونین مشاهده کنین و خلاصه درک مفیدی از اصلیترین استدلاهای موافق و مخالف این قضیه بهتون میده 💜
برای دیدن ویدیوهای علمی و فلسفی بیشتر کانال تلگرام تنیدگی @tanidegi رو دنبال کنین 💜🌹
تجربیات نزدیک به مرگ، مسئلهی ذهن-بدن و بقیهی تجربیات ذهنی گزارششده تا چه حد میتوانند از زندگی پس…
حیات در ماورا
قسمت چهارم: پاناسپرمیا _ نظریه رادیکال منشأ حیات
آنقدرها هم که به نظر میرسد عجیب نیست: ممکن است حیات روی زمین از میکروبهایی فضانورد سرچشمه گرفته باشد که از مریخ، یا حتی از جایی دورتر آمدهاند و سوار بر بزرگراهی بینسیارهای از شهابسنگها به اینجا رسیدهاند. باکتریهای اکستریموفیل شاید آنقدر مقاوم باشند که بتوانند این سفر سهمرحلهای طاقتفرسا را پشت سر بگذارند؛ یا با ترمیم DNA آسیبدیده خود، یا با …
حیات در ماورا
قسمت سوم: در جستوجوی غولها
الان، حدود شصت سال است که آسمان را به دنبال نشانههایی از هوش بیگانه کاوش میکنیم به این امید که با آنها ارتباط برقرار کنیم. این کاوشها بینتیجه بوده است.
در این سفر میبینیم که تا چه حد در جستوجوی حیات هوشمند جلو رفتهایم، حیات هوشمند چطور ممکن است ارتباط برقرار کند، چقدر میتوانند پیشرفته باشند و تماس برقرار کردن با آنها به واقع چه معنایی میتواند داشته باشد.
ممکن ا…
❤34👍5🔥4👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @tanidegi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Science Documentaries مستندهای علمی @Documentary20 · 24,160 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
SUPERNOOVA™ @SuperNoova · 43,423 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
🕊 فرازتد⚡️(روشنگری) @FarazTed · 21,045 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 September 2026
دانش، آگاهی @daneshagahi · 28,685 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Instrumentallist (موزیک لایت) @instrumentallist · 30,982 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
کانال علمی بیگ بنگ @big_bangpage · 39,445 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
خوانش کتاب برای انسان خردمند @homosapiensfa · 44,393 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
پادکست جافِكری @jafekri · 42,302 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
کتابهای ممنوعه @ketab_mamnouee · 79,753 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Radio Relax @RadioRelax · 322,459 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تنیدگی” (@tanidegi), 11,736 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanidegi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.