https://t.me/addlist/jern9pLByiA5Mjdk
👍11😁3

Channel
@stupid_risks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,449subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001598983749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stupid_risks |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stupid_risks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 7,449 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 7,454 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 7,461 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 7,468 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 7,468 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,008 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 893 | 88.6% | |
| 👎 | 80 | 7.94% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 2.08% | |
| 🤔 | 14 | 1.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,008reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2024 to 23 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/addlist/jern9pLByiA5Mjdk
👍11😁3
تا یه مدت نامعلومی نیستم ولی قول میدم قویتر از قبل برگردم. شما پروژه عظیم بیتکوین آداپشن رو پر قدرت ادامه بدید. یاد بگیرید و یاد بدید. بخرید و کمک کنید و یادتون تره آزادی آسون بدست نمیاد.
👍124🤔10😁6
امروز با هر کی از آزادی راس اولبریکت (Ross Ulbricht) میگم، معمولاً سؤال اول اینه: «راس کیه؟» وقتی جواب میدم که اولین کسی بود که یه بازار زیرزمینی اینترنتی برای خرید و فروش مواد مخدر و اسلحه با بیتکوین راه انداخت، سؤال بعدیشون اینه: «خب همچی کسی چرا باید آزاد بشه؟» با حرف زدن از دیدگاه خودم که مواد مخدر و اسلحه برای بزرگسالان باید آزاد باشه خسته و دلزدهتون نمیکنم. مسئله اینجاست که حتی اگر چارچوب قانونی آمریک…
👍62👎14🤔1
📌 بیتکوین چطور دنیا را تغییر داد؟ | مجید گتمیری توضیح میدهد 🖥 آیا میدانید بیت کوین چگونه متولد شد؟ چه فلسفهای پشت این ارز دیجیتال قرار دارد و چرا انقلابی در دنیای مالی ایجاد کرد؟ مجید گتمیری در این ویدیو به سراغ داستان جذاب بیت کوین میرود؛ از ریشههای ایده اولیه آن تا تحولی که در سیستمهای مالی سنتی به وجود آورد را مرور میکند. 🔻این ویدیو بخشی از رویداد بلاک صفر است که با حضور جمعی از متخصصین و فعالین صنعت رمز…
👍15
زمانی که سوسیالیسم، ایده غالب اقتصادی در دنیا شده بود، هایک از لیبرالیسم سخن گفت و تا آخر عمر مدافع لیبرالیسم و منتقد سرسخت سوسیالیستها بود و از بازار آزاد دفاع میکرد. توی این اپیزود، بخش اول کتاب پیدایش رو توضیح میدم با آرمین. آرمین چند سالی هست که درباره اقتصاد مطالعه میکنه و مینویسه. ابتدای این بخش به بررسی ناسیونالیسم و سوسیالیسم و البته تاثیر اونها بر اقتصاد میپردازیم. بعد از بررسی این دو موضوع میریم سراغ م…
👍26😁1
همین یک ویدئو برای این که بفهمید چرا نباید پول اوباش رو نگهدارید و ازش استفاده کنید کافیه.... یارو گفته مگه قرار نیست سال آینده 400همت دزدی کنیم؟ خب چشم رعیت کور. 25 همت دیگه هم می دزدیم...... این دیالوگ رو از مظفرالدین شاه قاجار هم نمی شنیدید اما از دولت مدرن امروزیتون می شنوید. از همه بحثهای حقوقی درباره آینده و قانون اساسی احتمالی ایران اینده که بگذریم، بذارید یه نکته بگم که در روز نوشتن قانون اساسی یادتون باشه. د…
👍111👎2
Stupid Risks pinned «کجایی؟ چیکار میکنی؟ چرا فعالیتت کم شده؟ داستان کنجکاوی و علاقمند شدن من به اسرائیل خیلی شبیه داستان آشناییم با بیتکوینه. هر دو نتیجه ماهها شخم زدن کانال @anarchonomy (و البته موضعگیری اولیه نسبت به پستهاش) و هر دو در تلاش برای یافتن پاسخی کارآمد به سوال…»
تنها جواب عساتید دو هزاری برای ریزش بازار: - گفته بودم که احتمال اصلاح هست - مدیریت ریسک مهمه و باید رعایت کنید - باید تنوع تو سبد ارز دیجیتال داشته باشی - کسایی که از پکیج من استفاده کردند، خبردار شدن از ریزش و رشد - و هزاران خزعبلات دیگر در وهله اول اینکه، مدیریت ریسک در نگاه این بی سوادها، فقط چیزی هست که باید رعایت شه. حالا این اصلا ریسک چیه نمی دونن یا تعریفشون از ریسک گذاشتن حد ضرر است!!! در وهله بعدی که تن…
👍29👎1
کجایی؟ چیکار میکنی؟ چرا فعالیتت کم شده؟ داستان کنجکاوی و علاقمند شدن من به اسرائیل خیلی شبیه داستان آشناییم با بیتکوینه. هر دو نتیجه ماهها شخم زدن کانال @anarchonomy (و البته موضعگیری اولیه نسبت به پستهاش) و هر دو در تلاش برای یافتن پاسخی کارآمد به سوال اساسی "#چه_باید_کرد ". اولی رهیافتی خشونتآمیز و دومی غیرخشونتآمیز، هر دو لازم و مکمل برای سرنگونی جمهوری اسلامی. هر دو مظهر قدرت و الهامبخش من. اما از اونجایی …
👍114👎56🤔2
این یک پیشنهاد مالی است. 🏷️ $94.7k 📕 https://linktr.ee/cryptovizart
👍41👎1
https://efex.pro/blog/the-fiat-standard-book-introduction/ یکی از همراهان کانال، خوانش صوتی کتاب "استاندارد دستوری" عموص رو برام فرستاده. خودم هنوز نخوندمش ولی تو برنامههام بود. گوش بدید و لذت ببرید.
👍11
اخیرا من به این داشتم فکر میکردم که مدل فعلی سلف کاستدی توی بیتکوین و نگهداری از بیتکوین خیلی بی رحمانه ست.. خیلی تنبیهگرانه ست. یه مقاله هم درموردش نوشتم که توی بلاگ بعدا منتشر کنم امروز توییت این پسره رو دیدم که یه عمر داشته خرد خرد بیتکوین جمع میکرده ولی یهو یه جا از دست داده به خاطر یه اشتباه و اعصابم خرد شد.. کلا سال اعصاب خرد کنی داشتم از این لحاظ.. کلی آدم بهم گفتن که بیتکوین از دست دادن و حتی از دوستان نزدی…
👍55👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @stupid_risks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 812,525 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stupid Risks” (@stupid_risks), 7,449 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stupid_risks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.