https://telegra.ph/چه-باید-کرد-درسی-از-بهمن-۵۷-برای-فردای-ایران-09-02

Channel
منابع بیگانه
@scientific_resources
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,124subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001787008508 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scientific_resources |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scientific_resources |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 16,124 | +124 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 16,000 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 16,002 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 16,004 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:42 | 16,013 | -17 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 16,030 | -12 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 16,042 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 16,036 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 16,051 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:33 | 16,052 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 16,055 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 16,052 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 16,054 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 16,061 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 16,072 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 16,087 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 16,096 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 16,100 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 16,105 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 16,110 | first reading |
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.04%
- avg views ÷ 16,124 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 651
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (21 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,254 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 19m 11s
- Average length
- 2m 08s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 51 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @scientific_resources. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
چپ ایرانی و ستیز با بازار آزاد چپ ایرانی بسیار مراقبه زاویه و ستیزش با بازار آزاد رو حتماً نشون بده. یعنی کسی که خودش رو چپ میدونه این چپ بودن رو باید با مخالفت با بازار آزاد نشون بده. این چپ در عین حال خودش رو «سوسیالدموکرات» هم معرفی میکنه ــ به هر حال سوسیالیسم کلاسیک شکست مفتضحی خورده و حمایت از الگوهای شکستخورده به نفع هیچکس نیست، و به عنوان آبرومندانهتری نیازه. اما یکی از مسلمات امروز دنیا اینهکه سوس…
کاپیتالیسم و فروشگاههای مواد غذایی فروشگاههای مواد غذایی از شگفتانگیزترین زوایای بازار آزاده. به تنوعش دقت کردید؟ البته منظورم در ایران نیست — فعلا در جایی که ما داریم زندگی با یه شونه تخممرغ سه چهار درصد حداقل دستمزد میپره. پیشتر در مطلبی با عنوان رابطهٔ جيب شما با دمپایی پشمالو سازوکار تأمین مایحتاج در کاپیتالیسم رو توضیح داده بودم. اونجا گفته بودم: در اینجا یک شاهکار رخ میده: در بازار آزاد که سیستمش توسط…
یکی از حیاتیترین تضمین کنندههای آزادی، امکان خروجه. فکر میکنم توی این متن به خوبی این مسئله و مقایسهی ملیت و دولت پیش از انقلاب فرانسه و پس از انقلاب فرانسه به وضوح بیان میشه و میتونه برای درک مسئله جالب باشه: برای مطالعه.
روشن کردن بیکینی و زیر چشم.
تالار شیاطین - ولادیمیر لنین @Learn_Cast @LearnCast
🎞🎞🎞 مالکیت خصوصی (فردی) و اخلاقیات
این لیست تعداد مسائلش شد ۱۵۰۰۰ تا. به نظر کمترین فایده AI این بوده که همچین لیستهایی تهیه بشه. https://www.unsolvedmath.com/
اینجا کوتاه و مختصر مفهوم ژاکوبین رو توضیح داده. https://www.proswit.com/jacobian_explained
بهترین حمایتی که کمونیسم تاکنون دریافت کرده، نه از سوی ارتش سرخ، بلکه از جانب روشنفکران غربیای بوده است که مایل بودند جنایات آن را توجیه کنند. رایمون آرون در کتاب خود به نام افیون روشنفکران (منتشرشده در سال ۱۹۵۵) توضیح میدهد که چگونه مارکسیسم همچون دینی دنیوی عمل میکند. قدرت این مکتب بیش از آنکه ناشی از دقت تجربیاش باشد، برخاسته از چشمانداز کلگرایانهای است که ارائه میدهد: تاریخی دارای جهت، معنا و مقصدی نویدب…
داشتم توی تلگرام دنبال یه چیزی میگشتم که دوتا چنل آرشیو غنی برای معماری و مسائل مربوط بهش پیدا کردم گفتم اینجا هم بذارم شاید بدرد شما بخوره یا شاید کسی رو داشته باشید بتونه استفاده کنه: چنل یک چنل دو
«انسان آزاد دقیقاً نقطهی مقابل «گلهی خاکستری» است. او کسی است که صبح از خواب برمیخیزد و میاندیشد: این زمان من، انرژی من و زندگی من است. او ارزشها را میآفریند؛ زیرا آنها را برای خود میخواهد—نه از روی عشق به همسایه، نه از سر وظیفه، بلکه از روی منافع شخصیِ خردمندانه. از دلِ همین خودگرایی (به معنای فلسفیِ رند) است که بیشترین شکوفایی برای همه پدید میآید: از طریق تبادل داوطلبانه، نوآوری و رقابت. دولت، که در پی شک…
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @scientific_resources. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@for_ashah · 3915 postsLiberty Institute / انستیتو لیبرتی
@liberty_institute · 3,4794 postsLearn Cast Library
@Learncast · 4,1293 postsبیگانه
@emicalll · 15,1183 postsPourya's Channel
@pouryachannel · 6853 postsگاراژ ــ مهدی تدینی
@Garajetadayoni · 133,7252 postsLearn Cast
@Learn_Cast · 7,4102 postsMathematical Musings
@MathematicalMusings · 4,3672 postsسهیل پروین
@soheilparvin2026 · 1352 postsNeuropedia
@CogSci_Neuron · 3,6621 postانسانشناسی
@anthropology_ehtnology · 1,9781 postMadson | جسمی در زمان
@itsmadson · 3241 postPlayfulanthropologist
@playfulanthropologist · 1121 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@liberty_institute · 3,4794 postsLearn Cast
@Learn_Cast · 7,4103 postsLearn Cast Library
@Learncast · 4,1293 postsگاراژ ــ مهدی تدینی
@Garajetadayoni · 133,7252 postsArchitecture Books and Magazines
@architecture_books_collection · 10,3671 postArchitecture Books
@architecturebookspro · 13,9441 postPlayfulanthropologist
@playfulanthropologist · 1121 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@science_magazine · 22,122
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
@ScientificDialectics · 24,277
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
@FarazTed · 20,586
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 September 2026
@homosapiensfa · 43,950
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
@doctor_zarifi · 55,751
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
@ghalatnanevisimm · 20,973
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
@healthclinic_ir · 22,810
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 September 2026
@jannatkhah · 106,864
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
@pv44telegram · 23,040
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
@Apply_Finland · 60,302
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
@vkends · 24,706
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@nashremilkan · 30,870
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
@nabayad_m · 39,208
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
@drminasafi59 · 27,126
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
@daneshagahi · 28,319
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
@freeforbiddenbooks · 43,020
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
@Dr_Azarakhsh_Mokri_Public_Files · 22,111
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@Avaye_Choopan · 36,434
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
@nabayad_mikhandim · 31,426
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,794
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@AI_in_Research · 282,831
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
@UIBiologists · 29,874
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
@PsyEngAcademy · 21,196
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“منابع بیگانه” (@scientific_resources), 16,124 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scientific_resources.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.