International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 96 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,385–16,507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 02:00
16,489
+8
8 Nov 2026, 14:06
16,481
+2
7 Nov 2026, 09:54
16,479
+4
6 Nov 2026, 10:16
16,475
-5
4 Nov 2026, 12:46
16,480
-1
3 Nov 2026, 13:29
16,481
-1
2 Nov 2026, 14:18
16,482
+2
1 Nov 2026, 14:47
16,480
+7
31 Oct 2026, 18:19
16,473
-2
30 Oct 2026, 15:28
16,475
-9
29 Oct 2026, 12:05
16,484
-4
27 Oct 2026, 08:08
16,488
-2
26 Oct 2026, 06:49
16,490
+1
25 Oct 2026, 04:10
16,489
+7
24 Oct 2026, 07:17
16,482
-2
23 Oct 2026, 05:19
16,484
-3
22 Oct 2026, 03:56
16,487
-4
19 Oct 2026, 22:16
16,491
+6
18 Oct 2026, 22:57
16,485
-3
17 Oct 2026, 20:08
16,488
first reading
Engagement
203 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 16,489 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,030
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
42
of 203 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
203 (1 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
127,190
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 06:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,540
Videos
≈2,010
Links
≈4,760
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 14m
Average length
4m 13s
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (45.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
قدرت شگفتانگیز ارتباط با غریبهها؛ گاهی یک لبخند ساده میتواند احساس تعلق را زنده کند
گاهی یک لبخند، یک جمله محبتآمیز یا حتی یک نگاه همدلانه از سوی فردی کاملا غریبه میتواند احساس تنهایی و بیگانگی را در انسان کاهش دهد.
پژوهشگری از دانشگاه جورجیا برای توصیف این لحظات کوتاه اما معنادار، اصطلاحی به نام تعاملات گذرا (Evanescent Interactions) را مطرح کرده است.
این اصطلاح به برخوردهای کوتاه میان افراد غریبه اشاره دارد…
آیا زمین میتوانست میلیاردها سال بدون وجود حیات، قابلسکونت باقی بماند؟
دانشمندان در پژوهشی تازه، با استفاده از یک مدل رایانهای، زمین فرضیای را شبیهسازی کردند که در آن هرگز حیاتی به وجود نیامده است.
نتایج نشان میدهد که برخلاف تصور رایج، وجود حیات برای حفظ شرایط قابلسکونت روی زمین ضرورت ندارد.
در این شبیهسازی، زمین بدون موجودات زنده نیز میتوانست از طریق فرایندهای زمینشناختی و شیمیایی، دمای مناسب و آب مایع ر…
دنیایی که داخلش محسن رضایی و ج.ونس حتی قرار باشد باهم نشست و گفتوگو برگزار کنند را نمیخواهم.
قحطالرجال یعنی همین!! 😐
چه بلایی سر دنیا آمده.
موزیک دقیقا برای همچین دنیایی طراحی شده:
همه مردن؛ همه چیز از دست رفته.
مدلی که جهانی ۲۶.۷ میلیارد ساله و بدون ماده تاریک و انرژی تاریک را پیشبینی میکند، از آزمونهای مهم کیهانشناسی سربلند بیرون آمد
(اینجا خبرش را پست کرده بودم سال ۲۰۲۴)
یک مدل کیهانشناختی جایگزین، با به چالش کشیدن مدل استاندارد جهان، تلاش میکند چند معمای بزرگ کیهانشناسی را بدون نیاز به ماده تاریک و انرژی تاریک توضیح دهد.
بر اساس پژوهشی تازه از دانشگاه اتاوا، مدل کیهانشناختی موسوم به CCC+TL توانسته است با چندین…
یک پژوهش گسترده مغزی، نظریه رایج درباره کنترل هیجان را به چالش کشید
فعالیت بیشتر در نواحی مغزی مرتبط با تنظیم هیجان، لزوماً به معنای توانایی بیشتر فرد در کنترل احساسات نیست.
در پژوهشی گسترده که نتایج ۴۰ مجموعهداده و اطلاعات حداکثر ۲۱۷۵ نفر را بررسی کرده است، دانشمندان دریافتند فعالیت شبکههای شناختهشده کنترل هیجان در قشر پیشپیشانی مغز، ارتباط معناداری با میزان موفقیت افراد در مدیریت احساساتشان نشان نمیدهد.
تمر…
دانشمندان دو پارگی عظیم در یک صفحه تکتونیکی در زیر ایران پیدا کردند
پژوهشگران با استفاده از دادههای لرزهنگاری، دو گسیختگی بزرگ در لیتوسفر صفحه عربستان، در اعماق جنوبشرقی ایران شناسایی کردهاند؛ یافتهای که دریچه تازهای به درک فرایندهای زمینشناختی منطقه و مراحل پایانی بستهشدن اقیانوس باستانی نئوتتیس میگشاید.
منشا اصلی این گسیختگیها به تفاوت ساختاری دو بخش صفحه عربستان بازمیگردد. بخش اقیانوسی که از سنگهای ب…
One, two, three… Destination: Air Jordan! ⛹️♂️
بایسن یا گاومیش کوهاندار ایالت مونتانا..😨
سپس فرار یک گلّهٔ هوموساپینس، که فکر کنم طبیعت اونها رو مجبور به ماراتن کرده 😐
با لهجه غلیظ استرالیایی.
🚀 @ofoghroydad
🪶 آهنگ «صدای سکوت» با سازهای بومی آمریکا
👩 با هندزفری در تنهایی، تحت ظلم و خفقان
🚀 @ofoghroydad
گونههای دیگر این آهنگ که در گذشته پست شدهاند 🩰اینجا و 🩰اینجا
#صدای_سکوت
#sound_of_silence
➖➖➖➖➖
ذهن بسیاری از افراد در گذر زمان، با مواجهه با چالشهای زندگی، بحث و گفتوگو با دیگران، مطالعه و تفکر، یا حتی برخورد با فردی که پرسشهای متفاوتی پیش رویشان میگذارد، تغییر میکند. اما این تغییر همیشه بنیادین و ساختاری نیست؛ گاهی فقط ظاهری است.
برای مثال، فردی پس از مدتی بحث و مطالعه به این نتیجه میرسد که وجود خدا با منطق و شواهد معتبر سازگار نیست. بنابراین خدا را کنار میگذارد. اما آیا واقعاً ساختار فکری او تغی…
آلپاکا، گاو، هوموساپینس و گوسپند 😆😂
They tipped me up for no reason!
تف کردن آلپاکا یک واکنش جالبه که اینجا ناشی از زیاد نزدیک شدن بهش و دفاع است.
همیشه بزاق نیست؛ گاهی محتویات معده است و بوی بسیار بدی هم داره برای میزبان.
🚀 @ofoghroydad
اگر جنگ رخ داد، گاهی شاهد هدف قرار گرفتن:
ریل
تونل
پل
تنگهکوهستانی
کامیون، و ماشینهای سنگین
در مرزهای شمال شرقی و شرق و جنوب شرق خواهیم بود.
این احتمالا چیزی است که میتواند از دل این تیم تازه تشکیل شده با نام دروازه آهنین در آن روزها نتیجه شود.(البته هرگز مانند محاصره دریایی آهنین نخواهد بود به دلیل عمق استراتژیک جغرافیایی بالای ایران: مرز طولانی)
اما نوشتم گاهی. چون همیشه به این فکر کنید که مرز زمینی است، آنچ…
Signed سام آریامنش
Showing the 12 most recent of 203 posts we hold for @ofoghroydad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ofoghroydad edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 14 posts on @ofoghroydad as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
45 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🕊 فرازتد⚡️(روشنگری) @FarazTed · 21,045 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 September 2026
دانش، آگاهی @daneshagahi · 28,685 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
دیالکتیک علمی @ScientificDialectics · 23,637 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Science Magazine @science_magazine · 22,976 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
I am Zeus @zeus110 · 22,974 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
اندیشه @andiiishe · 33,138 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
خوانش کتاب برای انسان خردمند @homosapiensfa · 44,393 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
مدرسه علوم انسانی @zistboommedia · 32,737 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
کانال علمی بیگ بنگ @big_bangpage · 39,445 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
پادکست رخ @rokhpodcast · 114,538 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
SUPERNOOVA™ @SuperNoova · 43,423 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
ایمان سلیمانی امیری- IMAN SOLEIMANI AMIRI @Imansoleymaniamiri · 25,296 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“افــــــق رویـــــداد” (@ofoghroydad), 16,489 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ofoghroydad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.