Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Science Club

Channel

Science Club

@scienceclubb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

255subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002164148921
TypeChannel
Username@scienceclubb
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/scienceclubb

Growth

255258256.56 August 2026 — 258 subscribers7 August 2026 — 258 subscribers15 August 2026 — 255 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 255–258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:59255-3
7 Aug 2026, 02:01258no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:48258first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3068.2%
👍1329.5%
👎12.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2025 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Feb 2026, 08:30 UTC131 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @daneshagahi

جنگنده‌های آمریکایی و اسرائیلی دارن روی شهرهای هدف عملیات سنگین انجام میدن، دیگه مهم نیست الان کجا و چی تایید شد و نشد. الان فقط جای امن تو خونه بمونید همین. در زمان مناسب همه از همه چیز مطلع خواهید شد. @daneshagahi

👎1

27 Feb 2026, 20:28 UTC225 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💡وقتی جنگ هنوز شروع نشده، اما مغز ما آن را حس می‌کند 🧨جنگ همیشه با انفجار آغاز نمی‌شود. گاهی خیلی زودتر، در مغز آدم‌ها شروع می‌شود. ✔مطالعات علوم اعصاب نشان می‌دهد وقتی جامعه زیر «سایهٔ احتمال جنگ» قرار می‌گیرد، مغز وارد وضعیت هشدار می‌شود؛ حتی اگر زندگی ظاهراً عادی ادامه داشته باشد. در این حالت، بخشی از مغز به نام آمیگدالا — سیستم تشخیص خطر — بیش‌فعال می‌شود. به همین دلیل است که این روزها بسیاری از افراد: مدام ا

5

19 Feb 2026, 21:13 UTC174 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

شب، طولانی‌تر از همیشه است. خیابان‌ها بویِ دود و دلتنگی می‌دهند، و خبرها مثل زخمِ تازه باز می‌شوند. خانه‌ها روشن‌اند، اما دل‌ها چراغی کم‌سو دارند. کسی بلند گریه نمی‌کند، همه آرام فرو می‌ریزند— و زیر این آوارِ بی‌صدا، تنها چیزی که هنوز نفس می‌کشد، اندوهِ جمعیِ ماست.

1

17 Feb 2026, 15:10 UTC177 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Drsaeedhosseinpouri

📍🌱 متأسفانه بیشتر مردم «تحمل کردن» را آسان‌تر از «تغییر دادن» می‌پندارند. ‌‌ ✍🏻 #سوزان_سانتاگ 🌀 YouTube •.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.• 💫 @drsaeedhosseinpouri

👍21

1 Feb 2026, 12:46 UTC215 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مراقبت روانی شرط ادامه دادن است. بدون حداقلی از سلامت روان، هیچ پایداری‌ای ممکن نیست. ذهنِ فرسوده نمی‌تواند فشار را نگه دارد، نمی‌تواند معنا بسازد، نمی‌تواند در طول زمان امیدوار و فعال بماند. انسانِ خسته، نه توانِ خشمِ آگاهانه دارد و نه ظرفیتِ امیدِ پایدار. او فقط واکنش نشان می‌دهد، و واکنش، جای کنش را می‌گیرد. به همین دلیل، مراقبت روانی نه عقب‌نشینی است و نه بی‌مسئولیتی. بلکه شرط امکانِ ماندن است؛ شرط این‌که بتوان د

👍41

30 Jan 2026, 19:15 UTC225 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ما فقط عزادارِ کشته‌ها نیستیم، عزادارِ زندگی‌هایی هستیم که ناتمام موندند، عزادارِ صداهایی که خاموش شدند و نگاه‌هایی که هنوز از عکس‌ها سؤال می‌پرسند. آدم‌هایی رفتند که می‌توانستند عاشق شوند، پیر شوند، بخندند، و شاید جهانِ کوچکِ کسی را نجات بدهند. خیابان‌ها شاهد بودند و دیوارها هنوز حافظه دارند. هیچ‌چیز واقعاً پاک نشده؛ نه خون، نه ترس، نه اندوهی که در گلوی یک ملت گیر کرده. بعضی‌ها کشته شدند، بعضی‌ها زندانی شدند، و خ

9

2 Jan 2026, 09:46 UTC284 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

داریوش مهرجویی 🌹🖤 «کسانی که مدعی‌اند همه چیز می‌دانند و همه چیز را می‌توانند درست کنند، سرانجام به این نتیجه می‌رسند که همه را باید کشت» - آلبر کامو (در پاسخ به امانوئل داستیه دولا ویژری ۱۹۴۸) 🎬 الماس در گام لامینور/ حسن صلح‌جو

3👍2

14 Nov 2025, 19:27 UTC272 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

🌟 📚کشف شخصیت کاوش در دنیای درون جردن پترسون ترجمه‌ی حامد شانکی

1 Nov 2025, 14:52 UTC291 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

با ویدیو بالا موافقید؟

  1. موافقم60%
  2. چندان موافق نیستم20%
  3. موافق نیستم20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2025, 15:58 UTC273 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

🌟از تروما تا التیام🌟 شناخت روان‌زخم‌ها و راه درمان آن‌ها مؤسسه‌ی مدرسه‌ی زندگی ترجمه‎ی صدرا صمدی دزفولی کتاب از تروما تا التیام راهنمایی کاربردی، عمیق و انسانی برای درک و غلبه بر تروماست؛ که به‌روشنی توضیح می‌دهد تروما چیست و چگونه می‌تواند زندگی فـرد را در طول دهه‌هـا تحت‌تأثیر قرار دهد. همچنین راهکارهـایی قابل‌فهم و مفید برای رهایی از الگوهـای دردناک و پیامدهـای گذشته ارائه می‌دهد. این کتاب شبیه همراهی خردمند و

26 Oct 2025, 17:43 UTC192 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Drsaeedhosseinpouri

📍🌱 هرگز هیچ دو انسانی با روحیات و علاقه‌مندی های مطلقا مشترک یافت نشده است پس اگر در یک رابطه‌ی دو نفره هیچ مشکل و برخوردی به وجود نیاید به این معنی است که یکی از این دو نفر تمام حرف‌های دلش را نمی‌زند... 📚 #دیر_یا_زود ✍🏻 #آلبا_دسس_پدس 🌀 YouTube •.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.• 💫 @drsaeedhosseinpouri

3

4 Oct 2025, 10:17 UTC251 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @daneshagahiPhoto

ما نه اشرف هستیم، نه مخلوق، ما حاصل یک فرایند آشوبناک و بدون هدف در کنار هزاران هزار محصول دیگر هستیم. ما فقط یک گونه زیستی هستیم مانند سایر حیوانات، جانوران، گیاهان و... و دقیقاً در جایگاهی که یک کرم پهن کف اقیانوس و یا گندم قرار دارد. هر چند که آنها بسیار مفید تر هستند. امروز روز ما حیوانات بسیار مضر برای مادرمان، طبیعت، هم هست بیایید کمی بیشتر به فکر گهواره‌ی خود باشیم. سروش سارابی @daneshagahi

👍43

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scienceclubb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Nov 2025, 14:52 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

با ویدیو بالا موافقید؟

  1. موافقم60%
  2. چندان موافق نیستم20%
  3. موافق نیستم20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2025 to 28 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 351,074 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Science Club” (@scienceclubb), 255 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scienceclubb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.