Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +3,229. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,328–38,566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:00
38,077
+36
16 Sept 2026, 07:17
38,041
+48
14 Sept 2026, 09:55
37,993
+38
12 Sept 2026, 19:01
37,955
+43
10 Sept 2026, 18:38
37,912
+68
7 Sept 2026, 13:57
37,844
+246
4 Sept 2026, 18:39
37,598
+277
3 Sept 2026, 06:23
37,321
+250
2 Sept 2026, 03:12
37,071
+248
1 Sept 2026, 03:43
36,823
+131
31 Aug 2026, 01:27
36,692
+207
30 Aug 2026, 04:14
36,485
+138
29 Aug 2026, 06:34
36,347
+136
28 Aug 2026, 08:53
36,211
+53
27 Aug 2026, 10:19
36,158
+39
26 Aug 2026, 11:14
36,119
+83
25 Aug 2026, 13:22
36,036
+203
24 Aug 2026, 12:57
35,833
+478
22 Aug 2026, 20:08
35,355
+246
21 Aug 2026, 13:55
35,109
first reading
Engagement
268 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.34%
avg views ÷ 38,077 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
93 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
110
of 268 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held
268 (3 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total
224,512
Reactions total
5,773
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 14:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
529
Videos
251
Links
735
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2h 26m
Average length
20m 57s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,271 reactions across 241 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,441
63.6%
👍
2,082
15.7%
👏
543
4.09%
🙏
415
3.13%
💯
241
1.82%
👌
229
1.73%
🔥
191
1.44%
🥰
184
1.39%
💔
170
1.28%
❤🔥
144
1.09%
🕊
127
0.957%
😭
64
0.482%
😢
61
0.46%
😍
43
0.324%
😨
42
0.316%
🤝
41
0.309%
😁
37
0.279%
💘
29
0.219%
👎
27
0.203%
🤔
26
0.196%
23 further kinds
134
1.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 241 of the 268 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,271 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 268 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 242 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Spirit_and_life. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 268 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
درمان شناختی-رفتاری (CBT) و روانشناسی مثبتگرا: میگویند «افکارت را مثبت کن تا احساست خوب شود». این رویکرد در برابرِ ترومایِ عمیق، صرفاً یک [Spiritual Bypass: دور زدنِ روحانی/روانی؛ استفاده از کلماتِ مثبت برای فرار از مواجههی واقعی با درد] است.
رویکرد سوماتیک (Somatic Experiencing): معتقد است تا زمانی که «بدن» احساسِ خطر میکند، هرگونه تلقینِ مثبتِ ذهنی یک دروغِ بیاثر است. شفایِ واقعی (چنانکه در این پروتکل دیدیم)…
در فرهنگِ ایرانی، یک کهنالگویِ ویرانگر به نامِ «سوختن و ساختن» و اسطورهی «کوهِ درد بودن» وجود دارد. مردان با شعارِ "مرد که گریه نمیکنه" و زنان با نقابِ "مادرِ فداکارِ بینقص"، دهههاست که ترومایِ ناشی از فقدانها، بحرانهای اقتصادی و اجتماعی را در بدنِ خود سرکوب کردهاند. نتیجهی این سرکوبِ فرهنگی، شیوعِ وحشتناکِ بیماریهای روانتنی (Psychosomatic) مانند دردهای مزمن لگنی، سندروم رودهتحریکپذیر (IBS)، میگرنهای بی…
گام چهارم: باز-والدگری عصبی-عاطفی (لنگرِ امنیت / Reparenting)
مکانیسم عصبی: در این مرحله، ما از پدیدهی [Neuroplasticity: انعطافپذیری عصبی؛ توانایی مغز برای سیمکشی مجدد خود از طریق تجربههای امن و جدید] استفاده میکنیم.
دستورالعمل اجرایی: در حالی که دستهایتان روی قلب و شکم است و همچنان کُند نفس میکشید، لحنِ صدایِ درونیِ خود را تغییر دهید. صدایِ قاضیِ بیرحمِ درون را خاموش کنید و صدایِ یک «والدِ مهربان و حمایتگر…
گام سوم: هک کردنِ عصب واگ (تنظیمِ فیزیولوژیک / Vagal Toning)
مکانیسم عصبی: عصب واگ [Vagus Nerve: طولانیترین عصب مغزی که از ساقه مغز تا رودهها کشیده شده و فرمانِ آرامش یا آمادهباش را به تمام اندامهای حیاتی صادر میکند]، کلیدِ اصلیِ خاموش کردنِ تروماست.
دستورالعمل اجرایی: دستِ راستِ خود را به صورتِ پهن روی قلب، و دستِ چپ را روی شکم (یا همان محلی که در گامِ قبل دچار گرفتگی بود) قرار دهید. تماسِ کفِ دست، به دلیل وج…
گام دوم: نقشهبرداریِ درونی (اسکنِ سوماتیکِ بدونِ روایت)
مکانیسم عصبی: ذهن عاشقِ داستانسرایی است و میخواهد مدام بگوید «چرا این اتفاق افتاد» و «مقصر کیست». داستان، شما را در تروما نگه میدارد. ما در این گام، «کلمات» را قطع کرده و «حواسِ درونی» [Interoception: تواناییِ مغز برای خواندنِ سیگنالهای فیزیکیِ اندامهای داخلی] را فعال میکنیم.
دستورالعمل اجرایی: چشمانتان را ببندید. هرگاه ذهن خواست به داستانِ آن رنج برگرد…
گام اول: فروپاشیِ کنترلگرِ درون (خلعسلاحِ پرسونای قوی)
مکانیسم عصبی: انسانِ آسیبدیده برای بقا، یک زرهِ روانی [Defense Mechanism] میسازد تا نشان دهد که «من خوبم و قوی هستم». این تظاهر، انرژیِ عظیمی از سیستم عصبی میگیرد.
دستورالعمل اجرایی: در یک اتاقِ کاملاً ساکت و تنها بنشینید. چشمان خود را باز نگه دارید (تا از واقعیتِ حال کنده نشوید). با صدایِ بُلند و قاطعانه، این حقیقتِ تلخ را به زبان بیاورید: "من از فلان اتف…
هشدارهای بالینی و ایمنی]
این یک پروتکلِ عمیقِ سوماتیک (بدنمحور) است. اگر شما از اختلال استرس پس از سانحه پیچیده (C-PTSD)، حملات پانیکِ حاد، یا اختلالاتِ تجزیهای [Dissociative Disorders: قطعِ ارتباطِ روانی با واقعیت و بدن] رنج میبرید، این تمرین ممکن است باعثِ غلیانِ ناگهانیِ تروما (Flooding) شود. در این موارد، این تمرینِ عمیق را صرفاً تحتِ نظارتِ یک رواندرمانگرِ تروما (رویکرد SE یا EMDR) انجام دهید.
در اپیستمولو…
گام چهارم: تحملِ اضطرابِ دریافت (Affect Tolerance & The Guilt of Separation)
مکانیسم: بلافاصله پس از واگذاریِ کار و دریافتِ کمک، یک موجِ سهمگین از احساسِ گناه [Guilt]، شرمِ پنهان، یا اضطرابِ بیارزشی به شما حمله میکند. با آن نجنگید. آن را توجیه نکنید. فقط در این آتش بنشینید و نظارهگر باشید. به خود بگویید: "من شایستهی استراحت و دریافتِ عشقِ بیقیدوشرط هستم."
تحلیل بالینی: این حیاتیترین بخشِ پروتکل است که یونگیه…
گام سوم: اقدامِ سایهشکن (Micro-Delegation / واگذاری خُرد)
مکانیسم: در ۲۴ ساعت آینده، یک کارِ بسیار کوچک، پیشپاافتاده و بیخطر (مثل خرید یک نان، جابجا کردن یک صندلی، یا ریختنِ یک لیوان چای) را آگاهانه به یک شخصِ امن واگذار کنید. فقط بگویید: "من خستهام، لطفاً این کار را برایم انجام بده."
تحلیل بالینی: این تکنیک مبتنی بر مواجههدرمانیِ تدریجی [Systematic Desensitization] است. ما با واگذاریِ یک کارِ کوچک، به مدارِ ت…
گام دوم: تفکیک ایگو از سایه (Cognitive Unmeshing)
مکانیسم: قلم و کاغذ بردارید (نوشتن فیزیکی، دو نیمکرهی مغز را درگیر میکند). بنویسید: "نیاز به کمک داشتن، نقصِ هستیشناختیِ من نیست. این صدای مادرِ غایب/مضطربِ درونِ من است که میترسد اگر وابسته شود، رها گردد."
تحلیل بالینی: شما در حالِ اجرای تکنیکِ «عینیتبخشیِ روانی» [Objectification of the Complex] هستید. تا زمانی که فکر میکنید این استقلال، «خودِ واقعیِ شماست»، …
گام اول: ردیابیِ سوماتیک و عصبشناختی (Somatic Tracking)
مکانیسم: هر زمان که مغزتان در برابرِ پیشنهادِ کمکِ دیگران فرمان داد "نه، خودم انجامش میدهم"، دقیقاً ۵ ثانیه مکث کنید. در این لحظه، آگاهیِ خود را از قشرِ پیشپیشانی (منطق) به ساحتِ بدن (سیستم لیمبیک) منتقل کنید. به قفل شدنِ فک، انقباضِ شانهها و حبس شدنِ نفستان دقت کنید.
تحلیل بالینی: این انقباض، قدرت نیست؛ این فعال شدنِ سیستمِ عصبیِ سمپاتیک [Sympathetic Arou…
❤26👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 268 posts we hold for @Spirit_and_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Spirit_and_life edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Spirit_and_life named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sprit_and_life named in 6 posts, 3 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
@spirit_and_life_ named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
vkends | مجله ایدهها @vkends · 24,706 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
بنیاد فرهنگ زندگی ـ سهیل رضایی @bonyadfarhangzendegi · 36,705 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
پرسونا @psychology_personaa · 19,910 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 September 2026
فیلم های کوتاه روان شناسی @psyshortmovies · 34,442 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
| پادکست فارسی انسانک | @ensanak · 31,479 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
زندگی سالم (سوده هروی) روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @zendeegiesaleem · 157,463 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Dr Sargolzaee podcast @drsargolzaeipodcast · 23,815 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
HIGH MOVIES @high_moviess · 52,973 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
فایل کارگاههای روانشناسی @psykargah · 23,105 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 September 2026
Anousha @anousha_eternal · 82,677 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
🔰پکیج های روانشناسی💯 @package_psy · 21,289 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
علاقمندان به «دکتر آذرخش مکری» @azarakhsh_mokrii · 24,291 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ” (@Spirit_and_life), 38,077 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Spirit_and_life.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.