10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,810–34,875 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 07:53
34,867
+48
14 Aug 2026, 21:17
34,819
-19
13 Aug 2026, 14:38
34,838
-16
12 Aug 2026, 11:08
34,854
+37
11 Aug 2026, 10:44
34,817
-6
10 Aug 2026, 13:25
34,823
-16
9 Aug 2026, 14:12
34,839
-8
8 Aug 2026, 10:55
34,847
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:00
34,848
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:56
34,848
first reading
Engagement
80 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.93%
avg views ÷ 34,867 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
79 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 80 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 78 of 79 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
80 (3 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
108,366
Reactions total
3,179
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 24m
Average length
28m 55s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,179 reactions across 78 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,097
66.0%
👍
411
12.9%
🙏
112
3.52%
💯
109
3.43%
👏
91
2.86%
👌
74
2.33%
🔥
62
1.95%
💔
52
1.64%
🥰
40
1.26%
🕊
20
0.629%
😢
18
0.566%
🤝
17
0.535%
❤🔥
16
0.503%
😁
10
0.315%
🤔
10
0.315%
👎
8
0.252%
😍
5
0.157%
👾
4
0.126%
💘
4
0.126%
🤩
4
0.126%
6 further kinds
15
0.472%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 79 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Spirit_and_life. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
عاشق شدن یعنی اینکه عمیقترین زندگی نزیستهمان را به کسی بدهیم که مدتی برایمان نگهش دارد تا موقعی که آماده پس گرفتنش شویم.
واقعیت دردناک این است که بخش اعظم آنچه در ماجراهای عاشقانه میگذرد در عمل زندگی نزیسته خودمان است که بهسوی خودمان بازتابانده میشود.
لحظهای تأمل کنید و نگاهی به روابط شخصیتان بیندازید. خصوصیاتی که وقتی اولین بار عاشق شدید در وجود عشقتان دیدید و مجذوبش شدید چه بود؟ چه چیزی او را در نظرتا…
حالا که توضیح مختصری دربارهی سایه دادیم، بریم سراغ دو کهنالگوی دیگه که مربوط به بخش مردانه و زنانهی روان ما هستن و قراره در ادامهی این مجموعه به شکل کاملتری بررسیشون کنیم.
به بیان خیلی ساده:
• آنیما: بُعد زنانهی درون مرد
• آنیموس: بُعد مردانهی درون زن
شناخت این دو کهنالگو خیلی مهمه، چون:
1. بر اساس اونها، شریک عاطفی خودمون رو در دنیای بیرون انتخاب میکنیم.
2. این کهنالگوها واسطهای هستن بین خودآگاه و…
میخوایم به سه کهنالگوی اصلی بپردازیم: سایه، آنیما و آنیموس.
این کهنالگوها جنبههای منفی و همینطور مثبت روان ما رو – که ازشون آگاه نیستیم – در دیگران به ما نشون میدن.
اما چرا آگاهی از این سه کهنالگو اینقدر مهمه؟
چون وقتی بخشهای ناخودآگاه رو به سطح خودآگاهی بیاریم، خودمون رو بهتر میشناسیم و منشا بسیاری از رفتارها و واکنشهامون رو در طول زندگی کشف میکنیم.
برای این کار، اول باید با مکانیزم فرافکنی آشنا بشیم؛ چو…
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ pinned «دوستان یه همچین تبلیغی میاد 🤣🤣😬😬 ما انجام نمیدیم کلا تبلیغ بیشتر پستها که از کلاسها کتاب خونی یا جاهای دیگه قرار میدم تبلیغ نیستن و اگر انجام بدیم حتما هشتگی چیزی حتما میزنییم حالا بعدشم چرا همچین تبلیغی بکنمی😬🤣🤣 دوستان راهی هست دیگه نیاد از این تبلیغات…»
چرا مردانِ دستنیافتنی، زنان را دیوانه میکنند؟
(کالبدشکافیِ عقدهی پدرِ غایب)
آیا تا به حال به این تناقضِ ویرانگر در روابط دقت کردهاید؟
زنانی که به دنبال عشق و آرامش هستند، مدام جذبِ مردانی میشوند که از نظر هیجانی سرد، مسدود و غیرقابلِاتکا هستند. و غمانگیزتر آنکه، اگر یک مردِ واقعاً امن و حامی وارد زندگیشان شود، احساسِ بیحوصلگی، شک یا خفگی میکنند!
درمانگران در روانشناسی تحلیلی، از جمله سوزان شوارتز، لیند…
یکی از نکاتی که در حوزه ارتباطی اهمیت بسیار دارد، انتقال درست عواطف و احساسات است. اشتباه شایعی که تقریبا همه ما در ارتباط با دیگران (از اعضای نزدیک خانواده گرفته تا دوستان و ...) مرتکب می شویم این است که عواطف و احساسات خود را به صورت خام و در شرایطی که برای خودمان هم تجزیه و تحلیل نشده است انتقال می دهیم. برای مثال خشم خود را بدون اینکه از هیچ فیلتر درونی عبور کرده باشد، در قالب کلماتی به بیرون پرتاب می کنیم که ممک…
معتقدم بخش مهمی از احساس پوچی جمعی ما به خاطر این مرحله بسیار خودمحور در پروسه تکاملی بشر است که فکر می کنیم همه چیز از «من» آغاز می شود: من چیزی را می خواهم، من می خواهم موفق شوم، من می خواهم پیشرفت کنم و حتی اینکه من می خواهم تعلق داشته باشم.
خوشبختی واقعی وابسته به رابطه متقابل با محیطی است که در آن پرورش یافته ایم. همانگونه که میتوکوندری کار می کند و ذرات غذایی را تبدیل به انرژی کرده و به سلولهای بدن می رساند، م…
در مواجهه با تروما، سه واکنش وجود دارد: فرار کردن، جنگیدن و یخ زدن
اگر فواصل رخ دادن تروما طولانی باشد، هم بدن و هم روان ما فرصت کافی برای انتخاب از میان گزینه های واکنش را خواهند داشت. برای مثال در مواجهه با خطر شروع به دویدن در جهت مخالف می کنیم. ولی اگر تروما پیوسته و با فواصل کوتاه رخ دهد، روان ما نیز همچون جسم مان گزینه یخ زدن را انتخاب می کند و از جنگیدن یا گریختن دست بر می دارد. کسانی که قربانیان خشونت خانگی،…
در مناطقی از غرب آفریقا، وقتی کسی کار ناپسندی انجام می دهد او را به مرکز دهکده می برند و برای دو روز، تمام اعضای قبیله او را احاطه می کنند و درباره ویژگیهای خوب و مثبت آن فرد حرف می زنند. آنها معتقد هستند که هر فرد ذاتا خوب است ولی گاهی هم اشتباهاتی مرتکب می شود که در واقع درخواست کمک است. افراد قبیله کنار هم در این آئین جمع می شوند تا به فرد خوبی ذاتی اش را یادآوری کنند. اعتقاد جمعی این است که این حمایت، از هر نوع …
دوستان یه همچین تبلیغی میاد 🤣🤣😬😬
ما انجام نمیدیم کلا تبلیغ
بیشتر پستها که از کلاسها کتاب خونی یا جاهای دیگه قرار میدم تبلیغ نیستن
و اگر انجام بدیم حتما هشتگی چیزی حتما میزنییم
حالا بعدشم چرا همچین تبلیغی بکنمی😬🤣🤣
دوستان راهی هست دیگه نیاد از این تبلیغات اگر هست بگین و اینکه واقعا دلم میخاد ببینم کی انجام میده برم بیینم مشتاق شدم😁😁😁
اگر تهران هستید، این دعوت را جدی بگیرید.
اگر موسیقی را دوست دارید و برایتان مهم است که در این روزهای سخت، از جوانهای بااستعداد ایرانی حمایت کنید، حتماً در این اجرا شرکت کنید.
عرفان از همان روزهای اول کنار ما بود؛ بدون هیچ چشمداشتی کارهای صدا و مسترینگ را انجام داد و با تمام توانش همراه این مسیر بود. او یک نوازندهی بسیار حرفهای است و قطعاتی که قرار است در این اجرا اجرا و خوانده شوند، حاصل مدتها تمرین و تلاش هست…
❤30👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @Spirit_and_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 554,189 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Spirit_and_life named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@spirit_and_life_ named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
زندگی سالم (سوده هروی) روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @zendeegiesaleem · 157,958 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ” (@Spirit_and_life), 34,867 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Spirit_and_life.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
