Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ВОСВОД Звенигород

Channel

ВОСВОД Звенигород

@vosvodZvenigorod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

104subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001540674500
TypeChannel
Username@vosvodZvenigorod
Description03.07.1871 было основано Всероссийское общество спасения на водах. Спасаем жизни и природ О нас, контакты +79663030288 [email protected] https://t.me/vosvodZvenigorod/3
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vosvodZvenigorod

Growth

1047 August 2026 — 104 subscribers9 August 2026 — 104 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 103–105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 09:30104no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:16104first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 104 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held20 (24 March 202622 July 2026)
Views total68
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
218
Videos
100
Links
269

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 41s
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍787.5%
😁112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @obshinanewsVideo

По тревоге более сотни общинников приехали угомонить приезжих на озере. Воскресным вечером в Балашихе семьи общинников отдыхали на озере. А рядом выходцы из ближнего зарубежья устроили свою вакханалию: распивали спиртное и разбрасывали мусор. Когда один из общинников попросил вести себя потише и убрать за собой, приезжие рассвирепели. В адрес общинника полетели угрозы и оскорбления. Тогда на место были вызваны друж

👍1

19 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC53 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

19.07 День реки Москва 19 июля город отмечает День Москвы-реки. Праздник учредили сами горожане в 2015 году, проголосовав за него на портале «Активный гражданин».

👍2

4 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC47 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Плот более 25.000 лет помогает человеку на воде современные плоты — не просто связанные бревна, а целые плавучие базы отдыха: на них есть баня, освещение, холодильник, печь под казан, USB-разъемы для зарядки гаджетов, посуда, вторая палуба. Весит такая «база» 3,5 тонны Маршруты – разные. На одном можно увидеть вековые сосны и песчаные пляжи, на другом — меловые скалы и древние пещеры, на третьем — старинные храмы и

30 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC47 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @DmitriySteshinVideo

❗️Открыт набор операторов БПЛА в подразделение беспилотных систем (г. Балашиха) Единовременная выплата — 3 000 000 р. Выплата за год — от 5 500 000 р. Стране нужны операторы разведывательных и ударных БПЛА, связь, РЭБ, аналитика, инженерные направления. Требования: возраст от 18 лет, категория здоровья А/Б, быть с ПК на «ты», готовность обучаться и работать с современной техникой Если есть интерес к дронам, элект

22 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC41 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @olegtsarovPhoto

Когда люди были радарами Я уже писал, что немецкие бомбардировщики Messerschmitt, Junkers и Heinkel были пострашнее украинских беспилотников. И их было несопоставимо больше. Но советская система ПВО в основном справлялась. В 1941 году у СССР не было сплошного радарного поля, но небо не было слепым. По всей стране стояли посты ВНОС — воздушного наблюдения, оповещения и связи. Колхозники, учителя, студентки с бинокле

21 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026

. #безопасность Три способа приземлить БПЛА 1. Локация понятна, возможности противника – тем более. ТТХ очередного «вундерваффе» ВСУ тоже известны. Достаточно создать единую эшелонированную зону безопасности в малом небе, связав между собой комлексы «Волна Купол Гарант» с мобильными отрядами охотников за беспилотниками — на открытых пикапах с пулеметами и запасами дронов-перехватчиков «Елка» (что уже происходит

19 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC37 viewsread 9 August 2026

. #Спасатель на САП спасают даже баранов.

15 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @chadayevru

Дополнение по кадровому вопросу. Когда мы только запускали проект КВН, в команде состоялось одно важное совещание. Где было совместно постулировано, что у дрона на волокне есть особенности пилотирования, требующие переучивания даже опытных FPV-пилотов, и если этот процесс не организовать должным образом, эффект будет сильно смазан статистикой обрывов и недолётов. Поэтому мы заняли тогда твёрдую позицию в переговора

👍1

15 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC30 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @chadayevru

Ну и последнее, уже почти политическое. Бог с ними, с небратьями. Но «государству-цивилизации» должно быть стыдно, что его со всем его пафосом можно вот так закидать копеечными пердолётами с движком чуть не от газонокосилки, летающими со скоростью патриархов авиации вековой давности. И поломать логистику с помощью ещё более маленьких и дешёвых авиамоделек с камерой и предобученной нейронкой на борту. И то и то можн

15 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC31 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @chadayevru

1. Прежде чем закупать и устанавливать что-либо, не поленитесь описать документом модель угроз и расчётные требования к вашей системе защиты. 2. Никакое «изделие» само по себе никогда не является панацеей. Работает только система, являющаяся комбинацией из технических и организационных средств и решений. 3. Невозможно защитить никакой отдельно взятый объект. Работает только комбинация объектовой и зональной защиты

8 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC59 viewsread 9 August 2026

. Рынок туризма 🇷🇺 Россия · Оборот: $57 млрд · Ночёвки: 0,45 млрд · Средний чек: $126 · Диапазон: $60 – 130 🌍 Африка (Египет) · Оборот: $169 млрд · Ночёвки: 0,62 млрд · Средний чек: $272 · Диапазон: $10 – 160 🌏 Азия (Китай) · Оборот: $1,33 трлн · Ночёвки: 5,8 млрд · Средний чек: $229 · Диапазон: $80 – 180 🇺🇸 США · Оборот: $1,35 трлн · Ночёвки: 2,25 млрд · Средний чек (ночь): $600 · Диапазон: $120 – 250 🇪🇺

8 Jun 2026, 05:41 UTC46 viewsread 9 August 2026

. Сапы и опасность https://www.mk.ru/incident/2026/05/28/v-omske-posle-splava-na-sapbordakh-bessledno-propala-semya.html

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vosvodZvenigorod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ВОСВОД Звенигород” (@vosvodZvenigorod), 104 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vosvodZvenigorod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.