9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,865–19,926 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:25
19,872
-7
11 Aug 2026, 17:22
19,879
-9
10 Aug 2026, 17:31
19,888
-7
9 Aug 2026, 17:52
19,895
-9
8 Aug 2026, 17:37
19,904
-3
7 Aug 2026, 19:54
19,907
-3
6 Aug 2026, 21:30
19,910
-9
6 Aug 2026, 02:06
19,919
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:14
19,919
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 19,872 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,410
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
22 (19 June 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
44,080
Reactions total
570
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,630
Videos
≈463
Links
≈2,010
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 03s
Average length
1m 51s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,424 reactions across 22 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
669
27.6%
👍
506
20.9%
❤
350
14.4%
🔥
232
9.57%
😡
160
6.60%
🤬
157
6.48%
🙏
69
2.85%
🤪
66
2.72%
👎
55
2.27%
🙈
48
1.98%
👏
35
1.44%
😢
23
0.949%
💔
16
0.66%
🤔
16
0.66%
👌
11
0.454%
🖕
10
0.413%
🎉
1
0.041%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,424reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 22 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @evgenyprimakov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В Китае хотят продвигать идею единого народа, рассказал Алексей Маслов
"Мы сидели с одним крупным китайским аналитиком при Госсовете, и он мне говорит: "Зря мы начали говорит об этносах и нациях, китайский народ должен быть един.
Иероглифическая письменность для всех единая, язык тоже будет для всех единым, поэтому постепенно будем сливаться воедино".
Я ему говорю: "У нас же была идея "единая общность — советский …
Я уже несколько раз упоминал о новом (и в перспективе самом крупном и главном проекте нашего фонда). А сегодня пишу о нем уже всерьез и программно, поскольку он наконец начинает свою полноценную работу.
Чуть больше 6 лет наш фонд социальной поддержки «Хорошие люди» помогает нуждающимся людям в Саратовской области, позволяя тем, кто попал в беду, менять свою жизнь к лучшему. За это время мы создали до двух десятков п…
"У Британии не получится "оттолкнуть" нас от Дели" — Георгий Асатрян
"Индия на сегодня является страной, где наблюдается рост национального самосознания.
Премьер-министр Моди в блистательных отношениях с Путиным. И это первый лидер независимой новой Индии, потому что до него все лидеры жили еще в колониальную эпоху.
Это национально ориентированный человек, в одно время ему был запрещен въезд в США.
Можно вспомнит…
Очень хороший текст Дмитрия Новикова. О политике Трампа в отношении украинского конфликта без экзальтации.
https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/deankoridzhizacziya-novikov/
Продолжение истории украинского парня, который сбежал из учебки в Англии и выбрал мир и свободу.
https://pikabu.ru/story/kak_menya_nasilno_mobilizovali_v_ukraine_popal_na_obuchenie_v_angliyu_i_smog_sbezhat_chast_2_14195998?utm_source=linkshare&utm_medium=sharing&utm_campaign=mobile_native_shkak
Если это не фейковый текст, то это просто бомба, а не материал.
https://pikabu.ru/story/kak_menya_nasilno_mobilizovali_v_ukraine_popal_na_obuchenie_v_angliyu_i_smog_sbezhat_14192962?utm_source=linkshare&utm_medium=sharing&utm_campaign=mobile_native_share
Мне кажется, что эта разумная вроде бы мера сейчас, вероятно, откроет двери в ад. Потому что на наши головы посыпятся сообщения от жуликов о том, что "вы только что взяли кредит" и "чтобы отменить отправьте там код".
Причём официальное оповещение будет по официальным же каналам — через Госуслуги и прочее. Но в атаках кто там что разберет, мошенники будут брать "на испуг", нахрапом, давя на эмоции. Они и сейчас так по…
Поздравляем основателя РСМД Игоря Иванова с награждением орденом «За заслуги перед Отечеством» I степени!
Указом Президента Российской Федерации от 20 июля 2026 года № 495 основатель и первый президент Российского совета по международным делам, министр иностранных дел РФ (1999–2024) Игорь Сергеевич Иванов награжден орденом «За заслуги перед Отечеством» I степени — за большой вклад в реализацию внешнеполитического ку…
Анна Долгарева сегодня в эфире радио "Спутник" в программе "Починяем примус" в 20:00-21:00 в прямейшем эфире.
Изумительный поэт (поэтесса?), тонкий лирик и блистательный журналист.
Как в своё время Константин Симонов писал репортажи с фронта в "Красную звезду" — вот RT.
Слушайте, звоните в эфир, спрашивайте.
Говорим про литературу, поэзию, Соловки, литературные кружки и их борьбу (зачем, Господи, да вот непонятно).
…
"Сдаваться наш народ не потянется никогда": Евгений Примаков и Петр Лундстрем — о настроениях в России
Евгений Примаков заявил, что, несмотря на четвёртый год конфликта, разрыв между фронтом и тылом не уменьшается, а растёт. Он считает, что это может стать серьёзной проблемой.
Пётр Лундстрем отметил другую тенденцию: попытки вызвать панику из-за проблем с бензином не сработали. Вместо этого люди требуют более решит…
Собаку Лайку отпpавили в коcмоc зная, что она погибнeт.
Πоcлe этого в ООΗ пpишлo пиcьмo oт группы жeнщин из штaтa Μиccиcипи. Они пoтрeбoвaли ocудить бecчeлoвeчнoe oтнoшение к coбaкaм в СССР и выдвинули пpедлoжение: еcли для paзвития нaуки неoбхoдимo пocылaть в кocмoc живых cущecтв, в нaшeм гoрoдe для этoгo ecть cкoлькo угoднo нeгритят.
История человечества ⚡️
Германия впервые со времен Адольфа Гитлера запускает военную экономику - каждый третий евро в бюджете Германии связан с оборонной промышленностью.
Оборонный бюджет увеличится на 122% к 2030 году. Образование сократится на 17%. Цифровые технологии - без денег. Налоги падают, страна набирает долги и процентная нагрузка вырастет на 144%.
Страна наращивает вооружение, накапливаем огромный долг, одновременно разоружаясь…
🤬80😢9❤4🔥4👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @evgenyprimakov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 4,852 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Primakov” (@evgenyprimakov), 19,872 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evgenyprimakov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
