Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алексей Рогозин ✈️🚀🏗️

Channel

Алексей Рогозин ✈️🚀🏗️

@rogozin_alexey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,683subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001648995265
TypeChannel
Username@rogozin_alexey
DescriptionКанал в МАХ: https://max.ru/join/Rushjh2OszoaeeFgyE-omu3kRrhkcOKA9hQOVdd3C10 Генеральный директор Союза авиапроизводителей России https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Рогозин,_Алексей_Дмитриевич Обратная связь @vsemrad_bot
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rogozin_alexey

Growth

17,68317,74617,714.55 August 2026 — 17,746 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,746 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,737 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,738 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,736 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,735 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,734 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,735 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,726 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,714 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,701 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,693 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,689 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,683 subscribers5 August 202620 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 15 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,674–17,755 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 17:5717,683-6
19 Aug 2026, 18:1817,689-4
18 Aug 2026, 16:2217,693-8
17 Aug 2026, 13:5517,701-13
16 Aug 2026, 06:4417,714-12
14 Aug 2026, 19:4417,726-9
12 Aug 2026, 09:5417,735+1
11 Aug 2026, 12:3217,734-1
10 Aug 2026, 09:3317,735-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:3117,736-2
8 Aug 2026, 07:3417,738+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:1617,737-9
6 Aug 2026, 02:1717,746no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:2217,746first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.3%
avg views ÷ 17,683 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,010
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 June 202616 August 2026)
Views total25,050
Reactions total459
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,040
Videos
149
Links
1,370

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 00s
Average length
5m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,397 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,51763.3%
🔥29812.4%
26010.8%
👏893.71%
🙏622.59%
😁552.29%
🤬441.84%
👎281.17%
🤔281.17%
🤯90.375%
🤨60.25%
😢10.042%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,397reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
60
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 19 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rogozin_alexey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC≈2,490 views103 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Всех моих товарищей, кто служит и служил в Центре специального назначения "Барс-Сармат", всех воинов-добровольцев поздравляю с двухлетием подразделения. Гордимся и желаем новых побед!

🔥59👍2317👎3👏1

15 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC≈2,180 views132 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Самолёт или вертолёт поднимается в воздух не потому, что однажды его удалось собрать и он оказался способен летать. До первого взлёта тысячи специалистов должны доказать, что он полетит именно так, как было рассчитано: выдержит нагрузки, сохранит управляемость, продолжит работу в жару, мороз и обледенение, безопасно отреагирует на отказ и будет одинаково надёжен не только в первом, но и в тысячном полёте. В авиации

👍86👏21🔥159🙏1

3 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈3,680 views69 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @frequentflyers

Вообще было изначально понятно, что аэротакси — тупиковая ветвь развития, потому что из-за дороговизны это очень узкая ниша, а из-за регуляторики — ещё более узкая ниша: ни один чиновник не подставится, разрешив чему-то подобному летать над крупными городами. Так что военное применение — самое очевидное.

👍36👎10🤯7🔥65🤬5

3 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC≈7,020 views73 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Рынок eVTOL изначально развивался вокруг идеи городской воздушной мобильности: предполагалось, что электрические аппараты вертикального взлёта и посадки помогут бороться с пробками, превратив аэротакси в привычный городской транспорт. Пять-семь лет назад многие компании обещали вывести такие машины на рынок уже в 2024-2025 годах. Однако к августу 2026 года ни один полноразмерный пилотируемый eVTOL самолётной или конв

🔥40👍238😁2

31 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC≈9,680 views82 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Вышла моя статья в журнале "АвиаСоюз" с кратким рассказом о деятельности Союза авиапроизводителей России. Рассказываю, как меняется роль отраслевого объединения и почему именно экспертиза и нормативная инфраструктура становятся одними из ключевых факторов конкурентоспособности отечественной авиационной отрасли. Прочитайте, буду рад обратной связи. @rogozin_alexey

👍6114🔥4😁3

19 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC≈5,470 views71 reactionsread 20 August 2026

В США с 24 июля вступает в силу, без преувеличения, революционная перестройка подхода к сертификации малой авиации. Авиационные власти (FAA) будут задавать базовый уровень безопасности, а основные инженерные решения перенесёт в систему отраслевых консенсусных стандартов, официально признанных в качестве допустимых, но не единственных методов подтверждения соответствия. Реформа MOSAIC охватывает самолёты, планеры, ав

👍4813🔥5🤔4😁1

18 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC≈44,300 views119 reactions5 Starsread 20 August 2026

Сегодня в "Известиях" вышла моя статья о проблемах обороны от дальнобойных БпЛА противника: Война дронов — это борьба скорости обучения. Техника сохраняет ключевое значение, однако решающее преимущество получает та сторона, которая быстрее обнаруживает угрозу, анализирует обстановку, принимает решения, воздействует на противника, восстанавливает свои возможности и совершенствует систему после каждого эпизода. Главная

👍89👏10🔥10😁43👎2🤨1

14 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC≈33,700 views91 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

Франция объявляет о передаче Украине лицензий на производство ракет SCALP, Aster 30 и авиабомб AASM Hammer. На уровне политических заявлений всё выглядит "изящно": Украина получает возможность создать собственную оборонную промышленность. Но если убрать политические "бантики" и посмотреть на экономику, возникает другой вопрос: а кто на самом деле является главным получателем выгоды от такой схемы? Современное высоко

👍59🔥14🤬104😁3🤔1

14 Jul 2026, 05:42 UTC≈11,900 views94 reactions10 Starsread 20 August 2026

КоммерсантЪ: "Минобороны предложило встроить часть гражданских стандартов в систему гособоронзаказа... Областью применения документа могут быть отрасли двойного назначения, где гражданские и военные разработки используют сходные технологии. Ярким примером является рынок беспилотных авиационных систем (БАС): в России уже сформирована линейка стандартов для гражданских БАС, регулирующих их классификацию, разработку и т

👍7314🙏5👏1😁1

4 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC≈322,000 views300 reactions4 Starsread 20 August 2026

Как не проиграть войну дронов? Военное применение беспилотников кажется дешёвым только на уровне отдельного изделия. FPV, коптер или простой самолётный БПЛА могут стоить несоизмеримо меньше цели, которую поражают, и средств, которыми их приходится сбивать. Но на уровне системы всё наоборот: дроны резко удорожают войну для обеих сторон. 🔹 Атакующий покупает дешёвый входной билет: корпус, мотор, камеру, связь, боевую

👍200👏42🙏2810😁9🤔4🤨4🤬2

25 Jun 2026, 06:06 UTC≈33,800 views169 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026

Всегда считалось, что отечественные системы ПВО являются по многим параметрам лучшими в мире, но, как выясняется, быть лучшими сейчас уже недостаточно. Противовоздушная оборона становится не просто частично гражданской, но и народной - и это естественное следствие изменения самой воздушной угрозы. Когда угроза становится массовой, защита тоже вынуждена становиться распределённой. Но здесь возникает опасная иллюзия:

👍10439🙏12🤔7🔥4😁2👎1

23 Jun 2026, 10:47 UTC≈10,200 views74 reactions11 Starsread 20 August 2026

Ассоциация эксплуатантов Ан-2 намерена обратиться в Минтранс с предложением ввести государственное регулирование цен на авиационный бензин и авиакеросин. Повод понятен: рост цен, сложности с доступностью топлива, ограничения на сверхнормативную заправку и опасения участников рынка относительно дальнейшего развития ситуации. Но здесь интересен не только вопрос цены. Гораздо важнее посмотреть, как вообще работает меха

👍569👏5👎2🔥1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rogozin_alexey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 75,086 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алексей Рогозин ✈️🚀🏗️” (@rogozin_alexey), 17,683 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rogozin_alexey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.