9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +897. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,937–22,104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 04:57
21,969
+72
12 Aug 2026, 22:35
21,897
+111
11 Aug 2026, 19:02
21,786
+99
10 Aug 2026, 21:01
21,687
+72
9 Aug 2026, 21:11
21,615
+87
8 Aug 2026, 19:22
21,528
+175
7 Aug 2026, 22:05
21,353
+71
6 Aug 2026, 22:54
21,282
+210
6 Aug 2026, 03:47
21,072
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 21,969 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,990
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
26 (2 August 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
124,650
Reactions total
5,968
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,470
Videos
≈131
Links
≈255
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 43s
Average length
1m 43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,453 reactions across 22 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,462
45.1%
🤣
1,892
34.7%
🔥
760
13.9%
💯
172
3.15%
🙏
59
1.08%
👏
40
0.734%
😭
24
0.44%
🫡
22
0.403%
😱
13
0.238%
🌚
9
0.165%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,968reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.85%
1 of 26 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
4,140
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,040
over 24 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5x8gmkn
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Дамы, в воскресенье заканчивается наш конкурс с тремя коллегами. Они все супер классные, и я уверена, что они вам понравятся так же, как и ваша почтенная слуга. Напоминаю, что для выигрыша нужно быть подписанными на всех четверых, бот автоматически определит победителей и оповестит вас о выигрыше 🎁
👺Настя Бесит всё — королева мемов и хозяйка банок от прыщей на спине. Её канал это Курт Кобейн в мире бежевых бьюти-бло…
ЩАС ВСЕМ СЕСТЬ, ПОТОМУ ЧТО ЕСЛИ ВЫ УПАДЕТЕ В ОБМОРОК, ОТКАЧИВАТЬ ВАС НЕКОМУ, ВСЕ УЖЕ УБЕЖАЛИ (в конце поймете, куда).
Помните, в детстве батек приносил с работы конфетку и говорил, что встретил зайчика, тот спросил, куда он идет, батек ответил, что к вам домой, а зайчик вам эту конфетку и передал?
Так вот, девочки, я клянусь, я тут вообще ни при чем, ЭТО ВАМ ВОЛЧОК ПЕРЕДАЛ. Он как раз без конфетки, потому что очень…
Знаешь вот эти фильмы про то, что техника стала умнее человека, поработила мир и захватила власть?
Ну это же не шутки.
Я вот, например недавно опоздала к косметологу на 40 минут. Я никогда себе такого не позволяю, всегда выезжаю заранее и просто жду своей очереди.
А сегодня я просто проложила дорогу до Остоженки, села в машину, нажала «поехали» и, собственно, поехала.
Еду ещё и думаю, отвлекаясь от подкаста: что-то…
Девочки, ну у нас с вами новости, не знаю как вы, а я-то все еще худею. Не жрать, конечно, неприятно, но куда деваться. А вот по занятиям спортом несу вам выводы месяца:
В зал не ходила НИ РАЗУ.
В сентябре уже продлевать абонемент за год, а у меня конь не валялся уж месяца два.
При этом, опять же, вот фитстарз да? Купила еще будучи на первых сроках беременности Нилом тариф навсегда и что? До сих пор все обновления…
То есть, вы не знали про Tidy?
Я извиняюсь, но нате😂
Девочки, предупреждаю, это затягивает похуже абьюзивной зеленой совы, отвечаю, это как тетрис. Ты начинаешь бесконечно все фоткать и составлять луки из имеющегося. МИНУСЫ?
Причем, он сам все оцифровывает вот в этот белый фон, выглаживает вещь, додумывает. Я оттуда тырю картинки и продаю потом на оскелли свои брендовые шмотки, которые не ушли с молотка тут. Ну удо…
Я столько времени и денег в своей жизни потратила на нелепые эксперименты с одеждой, это ужас.
Когда у меня появилась нормальная настоящая гардеробная, которую сделали по моим эскизам, я думала, что проблема решена, ведь теперь верха отдельно, низы отдельно, трусики и бусики—и те под отдельным стеклышком.
А потом выяснилось, что я один хрен импульсивно покупаю то, что потом вынуждена отдавать (потому что для продаж…
Вчера ходила на концерт Лолиты, выводы:
1) Лола топ, что во времена дуэта Кабаре, что сегодня, всем так выглядеть в 62 настоятельно советую
2) Мне не нравится тереться об людей в толпе, учитывая, что половина из них не моется даже и раза в неделю, а мой рост—это вам не дышать свежим альпийским воздухом, а быть носом в районе жоп
3) Я тоже хочу петь на сцене! Почему я не звезда, я вас спрашиваю? Поэтому я поехала в…
Сестринство, пока я традиционно рыдаю, просматривая фото маленького Льва накануне его дня рождения, спешу напомнить вам, что вот тут еще идет конкурс и он супер.
И в нем надо участвовать!
Ну я хотя бы не купила старую Ниву и не иду в стендап.
❤166🔥54🤣38
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @bostonmood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 292,815 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ларис, прикинь” (@bostonmood), 21,969 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bostonmood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
