Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Синхронизация

Channel

Синхронизация

@Synchronews

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

55,846subscribers

+6,755 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001074437399
TypeChannel
Username@Synchronews
DescriptionОнлайн-лекторий с доступом к 2550+ лекциям о культуре по подписке. Скидка 30% на подписку по промокоду ТЕЛЕГРАМ 👉 https://clck.ru/3VQopL Чат поддержки: https://t.me/SynchronizeSupportBot Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3WAYUG
Created20 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Synchronews

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Synchronews/12921 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC@synchronize_artclub/10074 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC1.0016 minutes
@Synchronews/12924 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC@synchronize_artclub/10096 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC1.0010 minutes
@Synchronews/12927 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC@synchronize_artclub/10138 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC1.0021 hours
@Synchronews/12929 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC@synchronize_artclub/10149 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC1.0060 minutes
@synchronize_artclub/111623 Oct 2026, 11:04 UTC@Synchronews/13156 · this entry23 Oct 2026, 12:04 UTC1.0060 minutes
@Synchronews/13161 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 16:06 UTC@synchronize_artclub/112127 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC1.0028 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@synchronize_artclub12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0023 minutesthis entry (11–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 142 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Synchronews — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

48,68460,01354,348.555,8466 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net +6,755. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,985–61,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 01:1255,846-61
9 Nov 2026, 07:1855,907-30
7 Nov 2026, 22:3755,937-31
6 Nov 2026, 21:1955,968-30
5 Nov 2026, 22:1155,998-35
4 Nov 2026, 23:2656,033-21
3 Nov 2026, 20:0756,054-26
2 Nov 2026, 19:4956,080-29
1 Nov 2026, 18:2156,109-47
31 Oct 2026, 20:4856,156-50
30 Oct 2026, 23:0656,206-45
29 Oct 2026, 21:3656,251-65
28 Oct 2026, 21:0156,316-42
27 Oct 2026, 20:3956,358-52
26 Oct 2026, 21:2656,410-49
25 Oct 2026, 20:5956,459-223
24 Oct 2026, 18:5756,682-1,020
23 Oct 2026, 16:4657,702-71
22 Oct 2026, 17:5157,773-189
21 Oct 2026, 10:5457,962first reading

Engagement

223 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.98%
avg views ÷ 55,846 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 223 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held223 (31 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total83,168
Reactions total1,335
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 13:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,850
Videos
≈318
Links
≈2,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

7,402 reactions across 215 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,98353.8%
🔥92112.4%
💔5357.23%
🤣3244.38%
👍3214.34%
💘2433.28%
😱1562.11%
😈1341.81%
custom 52043823784699256481281.73%
🕊1101.49%
👏1061.43%
😭991.34%
😡771.04%
⚡660.892%
👀410.554%
custom 5192866527472273055400.54%
💯280.378%
🤝210.284%
🤔190.257%
💅180.243%
6 further kinds320.432%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 219 of the 223 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,402 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
65
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 223 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Synchronews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 223 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.448%
1 of 223 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,990
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,710
over 222 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHw7Pey15 October 20265 October 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (12.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC518 views16 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Бесплатный мастер-класс по искусству УЖЕ СЕГОДНЯ🤩🤩🤩 Не пропустите встречу с историком искусства Ольгой Чуворкиной в 19:00 мск! Сегодня Ольга расскажет, как художники прячут смыслы в деталях. И поделится лайфхаками-инструментами, которые помогут эти смыслы разгадать. Регистрируйтесь по ссылке! Всем участникам подарим полезные памятки по искусству 🤩

❤7👍6🔥3

11 Nov 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,160 views44 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Пенку снимали сегодня? 😏 Пенкосниматель — человек, который пользуется результатом чужого труда. Иными словами снимает пенку — самую жирную и лакомую часть остывшего молока🥛 Сатирический смысл слову подарил писатель и памфлетист Михаил Салтыков-Щедрин. Он прославил термин в очерке «Дневник провинциала в Петербурге» в 1872 году: За отсутствием настоящего дела и в видах безобидного препровождения времени, учреждается…

❤35custom 51928665274722730556👍3

10 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,380 views33 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Кто проклял пятницу 13-е? Люди давно сторонятся числа 13. У этого страха даже есть научное название — трискайдекафобия. В отличие от гармоничного «12» (12 месяцев, 12 знаков зодиака, 12 апостолов), «13» ассоциировалось с несчастьями. В христианстве традиция началась с Тайной вечери — последней трапезы Иисуса Христа перед распятием. Исследователи XVIII века назвали Иуду тринадцатым гостем застолья, который и предал …

❤22🔥11

9 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,550 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Только 4 дня: 50% скидка на живые лекции Насти Сивец в декабре!!! Таких цен не будет даже в Чёрную пятницу! ⚡️⚡️⚡️ На лекциях парфюмерного исследователя и блогера Насти Сивец всегда солдаут. В преддверии Нового года мы повторяем их ещё раз и даём САМУЮ БОЛЬШУЮ скидку в истории, чтобы вы тоже могли прочувствовать эту атмосферу! До 12 ноября по промокоду ТЕРПКО: 3 750 руб. вместо 7 500 руб. 🌸 7 декабря в 20:00 Как п…

❤11

7 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTC≈1,660 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026

А в нашем канале про искусство уже вышло второе задание про триптих Босха 🦇 Присоединяйтесь к обсуждению и разгадывайте тайны художника вмести с нами! Самые активные участники получат в подарок лекцию про Босха❤️❤️❤️

🔥13❤7👍2

6 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC≈2,010 views44 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

Приглашаем в путешествие по японским сезонам! 🤩🤩🤩 Думаете Япония славится только сезоном с цветением сакуры? А вот и нет! Японцы традиционно делят год на 72 сезона! Например, конец октября они называют Kosame tokidoki furu (или «Время от времени идут сильные дожди»). Чтобы вы прониклись атмосферой Японии и узнали её лучше, лекторий Синхронизация и сеть fast-casual бренда Soul in the Bowl подготовили для вас маленьк…

❤27🔥12💅4👍1

5 Nov 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,770 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026

А в отдельном канале об искусстве всю неделю будем разгадывать тайны знаменитого триптиха Босха! Присоединяйтесь💛 У символов Босха огромное количество интерпретаций, что имел в виду художник — уже не узнает никто. Но мы попробуем приблизиться к истине и раскрыть тайны мастера! 👈 В канале будут задания — самые активные читатели получат в подарок лекцию о Босхе! 😮 Первый пост выйдет в канале уже завтра! Присоединяй…

❤11🔥3

5 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,740 views19 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Бесплатный мастер-класс «Внутри шедевра: анализируем картины как искусствовед»! 12 ноября в 19:00 мск Ровно через неделю историк искусства и академический директор Синхро Ольга Чуворкина научит вас смотреть на шедевры глазами эксперта. Вы узнаете: 🪙 почему одни произведения становятся шедеврами, а другие забываются; 🪙 как правильно читать картины и находить в них скрытые детали; 🪙 почему великие произведения искус…

❤19

4 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,640 views25 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Новые курсы в подписке, которые вы могли пропустить 🤩 Подписка Синхро — это доступ к 2550+ лекциям о культуре, которые можно слушать и смотреть онлайн и офлайн в удобном приложении. 💡 В подписке постоянно появляются новые курсы! Вот несколько последних новинок: 🤩Философский кружок «Счастье под вопросом»: смотрим видео о ключевых идеях философов и обсуждаем их тексты на онлайн-встречах с кандидатом философских наук…

❤21👍4

3 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,640 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Приходите в святочный киносалон Синхро! ☕ Что входит в салон? 🤍 Закрытый Telegram-чат: чтобы вместе читать и обсуждать повесть, делиться впечатлениями и получать ответы от экспертов. 🤍 Квизы и дополнительные материалы: чтобы заметить все скрытые детали и дочитать книгу до конца. 🤍 2 онлайн-лекции с экспертами Синхро: филолог Анастасия Кругликова поможет понять текст и погрузиться в культурный контекст, а киновед …

❤17

Showing the 12 most recent of 223 posts we hold for @Synchronews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Synchronews edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 13 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Oct 2026, 13:18 UTCAnonymous Poll180 voters

Какие антиутопии будем разбирать на курсе?

  1. «Мы» Евгений Замятин54%
  2. «451 градус по Фаренгейту» Рэй Брэдбери49%
  3. «Заводной апельсин» Энтони Бёрджесс44%
  4. «Песнь пророка» Пол Линч16%
  5. «День опричника» Владимир Сорокин27%
  6. «Железная пята» Джек Лондон13%
  7. «Голодные игры» Сьюзен Коллинз36%

The shares total 239%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Oct 2026, 13:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz332 voters

Как вы думаете, у какого персонажа «Гарри Поттера» был прототип — реальная историческая фигура? 🧙

  1. Николас Фламель70%
  2. Минерва МакГонагалл16%
  3. Гаррик Олливандер7%
  4. Батильда Бэгшот7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Oct 2026, 13:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz415 voters

Как вы думаете, что изображено на этой гравюре?

  1. Извержение вулкана в Помпеях8%
  2. Гора Фудзи осенью82%
  3. Гора Эверест на рассвете4%
  4. Это вообще-то кадр из манги7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Oct 2026, 13:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz463 voters

Один из самых дорогих ингредиентов в парфюмерии — уд — добывают из слюны дальневосточного оленя

  1. Правда43%
  2. Ложь57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Oct 2026, 13:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz512 voters

В запахе жасмина и фекалий — одна и та же молекула

  1. Правда75%
  2. Ложь25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTCAnonymous Quiz518 voters

В хорошем парфюме может быть всего один компонент

  1. Правда38%
  2. Ложь62%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Arzamas
@ArzamasLive · 59,818
#1
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,172,481
#2
Правое полушарие Интроверта
@artforintrovert · 54,842
#3
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,101
#4
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 794,341
#5
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,620,198
#6
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,570
#7
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 299,576
#8
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 156,369
#9
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 121,661
#10
Дудь
@yurydud · 849,220
#11
БУДУ
@budujobs · 134,070
#12
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 299,577
#13
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 175,246
#14
Париж не стоит мессы
@deadpoetscom · 19,153
#15
А!
@aaamagazine · 78,716
#16
Горящая изба
@BurningHut · 26,670
#17
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 317,610
#18
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 415,877
#19
Кинжал
@Le_kinzhal · 45,997
#20
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,199
#21
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 279,022
#22
Афиша Daily
@afishadaily · 71,203
#23
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,007
#24
Level One
@levelvan · 8,855
#25
Московская ЩУКА
@moscow_pike · 63,121
#26
Ок, ясно
@yasno_live · 111,571
#27
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,144
#28
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 468,077
#29
Парс и фоны
@parslivres · 25,480
#30
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 368,647
#31
бумеры смотрят телек
@boomers_TV · 156,794
#32
Жидковские посиделки
@zhidkovskiy_talk · 576,141
#33
Т—Ж
@t_jrnl · 98,051
#34
эсэмэмы
@smmemshica · 4,791
#35
SETTERS EDUCATION
@setterseducation · 22,920
#36
Подписные издания
@izdaniya · 53,146
#37
ORNAMENT: журнал о кино
@ornamentmag · 19,847
#38
Sostav
@sostav · 56,425
#39
Балдёж и менеджмент
@emertnotes · 6,497
#40
Палиндром
@rdslv · 8,450
#41
олдскульный маркетинг
@marketingold · 122,984
#42
mads media
@mads_courses · 25,857
#43
Издательство МИФ
@mifbooks · 54,939
#44
Долецкая-Doletskaya
@alionadol · 75,423
#45
Саша Сулим
@sasha_sulim · 55,422
#46
Журнал НОЖ
@knifemedia · 101,868
#47
cinema sign
@signmag · 3,759
#48
Издательство "Фантом Пресс"
@phantombooks · 13,613
#49
Привет, не хочешь сходить?
@privetpoidem · 60,825
#50
Страдариум
@stradarium1 · 36,447
#51
Ты в тренде или уходи
@trendsetter · 1,503,563
#52
Издательства «Поляндрия» и NoAge
@polyandria · 13,868
#53
ХОРОШИЕ НОВОСТИ
@goodnews_goodtimes · 45,800
#54
Порез бумагой
@individuumbooks · 13,663
#55
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,116,618
#56
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436
#57
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 865,039
#58
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,058,487
#59
SETTERS Media
@setters · 82,535
#60
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 348,609
#61
Креатив со звездочкой
@creative · 133,428
#62
«Карьера» The Blueprint
@theblueprintcareer · 144,049
#63
The Blueprint
@theblueprintru · 96,489
#64
Правила жизни
@pravilamagru · 63,654
#65
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 124,951
#66
Лентач
@lentachold · 391,507
#67
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 912,968
#68
MUR
@fashion_mur · 205,098
#69
ÖMANKÖ
@omanko · 112,874
#70
ОЙСАШ🚀
@etosashaaaa · 52,985
#71
Рыба Лоцман
@ryba_lotsman · 52,173
#72
Осторожно, Москва
@ostorozhno_moskva · 396,349
#73
A-Teams | Карьера
@huggabletalents · 135,960
#74
careerspace
@careerspace · 165,023
#75
dmitrii belikov page
@dimavsedelapage · 6,911
#76
Cinemaholics
@cinemaholicsofficial · 30,890
#77
The Blueprint News
@theblueprintnews · 72,343
#78
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,166
#79
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 381,288
#80
Эйч
@careerwithh · 66,005
#81
Москва сейчас
@mosnow · 431,280
#82
Ретроградный Меркурий
@retrogrademercury · 161,191
#83
Клиент
@yourtypicalclient · 47,548
#84
Forbes Russia
@forbesrussia · 235,524
#85
mironovanastasiia
@mironovanastasiia · 145,394
#86
Город
@t_gorod · 67,900
#87
DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM
@dnative · 79,974
#88
Архитектурные излишества
@arkhlikbez · 123,467
#89
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,213
#90
etc. by Dasha Lukina
@etc_by_lukina · 8,383
#91
Лучшие вакансии
@vacanciesbest · 162,821
#92
Vrednayamoda / Вредная Мода
@vrednayamoda · 210,629
#93
РЕШаю, что читать // Редакция Елены Шубиной
@shubinabooks · 14,787
#94
ROGOV
@rogov24 · 184,474
#95
Новая газета
@novaya_pishet · 211,151
#96
Передали коллегам
@collegi · 134,121
#97

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Правое полушарие Интроверта
@artforintrovert · 54,842
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
OP-POP-ART
@oppopart · 30,480
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
PunkMonk
@punkmonkprod · 20,885
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 September 2026
Николай Жаринов 💀
@litsomel · 30,751
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
Alter
@psyalter_ru · 26,498
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Та самая wonder.place
@wonderplace_art · 26,776
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 October 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Синхронизация” (@Synchronews), 55,846 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Synchronews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.