Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ORNAMENT: журнал о кино

@ornamentmag

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,050subscribers

+72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735851154
TypeChannel
Username@ornamentmag
Descriptionканал печатного журнала о кино ORNAMENT — новости, жизнь редакции и работа над выпусками по заказам: @Happy_Days_Forever сотрудничества: [email protected] купить журнал: https://clck.ru/3EuAcV https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67b348db10cb33650ecd1d15
Created4 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ornamentmag

Growth

19,95120,14320,0476 August 2026 — 19,978 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,978 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,019 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,143 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,075 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,027 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,000 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,973 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,965 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,951 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,050 subscribers20,0506 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net +72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,922–20,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:4620,050+99
13 Aug 2026, 13:4719,951-14
12 Aug 2026, 12:0319,965-8
11 Aug 2026, 15:1419,973-27
10 Aug 2026, 11:4320,000-27
9 Aug 2026, 13:2220,027-48
8 Aug 2026, 13:4320,075-68
7 Aug 2026, 15:4020,143+124
6 Aug 2026, 16:5120,019+41
6 Aug 2026, 02:2019,978no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:1919,978first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.32%
avg views ÷ 20,050 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,670
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held26 (4 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total43,379
Reactions total946
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,170
Videos
351
Links
1,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

755 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
47162.4%
❤‍🔥12216.2%
🔥587.68%
😁344.50%
😍253.31%
😱141.85%
👏121.59%
👀111.46%
🌚60.795%
💔20.265%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 946reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 26 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ornamentmag. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC≈1,200 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Уже завтра пройдет последний спидфрендинг в честь нашего семилетия — зарегистрироваться всё еще можно здесь. Как мы и говорили, почти все города в серии связаны с нашей командой — и на шести предыдущих встречах вы могли познакомиться с кем-то из ORNAMENT. В Новосибирске у нас есть читатели и друзья, но пока нет никого из коллег. Возможно, именно на этом спидфрендинге кто-то узнает о журнале, откликнется на ближайший

10❤‍🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,640 views112 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

ШЫРГЫЗОР аналоН вотанаф ялд Подарим подписчику ORNAMENT и SPLIT SCREAM номер журнала, посвященный творчеству Кристофера Нолана, и виниловую пластинку с саундтреком к «Интерстеллару». Для участия в розыгрыше, нужно: • быть подписанным на ORNAMENT и SPLIT SCREAM, • и нажать кнопку «Участвую» под этим постом. Победителя выберем 28 августа. Отправка только по РФ. !ИЧАДУ МЕСВ

69😁21😱13🔥9

13 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈3,800 views49 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Команда журнала ORNAMENT приехала на Хлебозавод, чтобы ловить солнце, играть в бадминтон и по-новому смотреть на советский номер среди архитектуры авангарда. А потом мы с нетерпением ждали проявки, чтобы увидеть, какими получились кадры. А у вас есть такие плёночные фотографии с номерами ORNAMENT или Хлебозавода? Делитесь в комментариях — будем собирать свою коллекцию теплых моментов🤍

29🔥11😍9

13 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,650 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня, 13 августа, день рождения Альфреда Хичкока — главного героя нашего номера о триллерах. А ровно две недели спустя, 28 августа, день рождения Дэвида Финчера — второго главного героя этого номера. Предлагаем считать это знаком, что самое время познакомиться с творчеством этих двух режиссеров и начать проводить между ними параллели, как это сделали мы. В честь 127-летия человека, заставившего несколько поколен

29❤‍🔥6👏5

13 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,630 views35 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Нашли на складе небольшой запас журналов о Вуди Аллене — теперь вы можете заказать их на сайте (кстати, в сете с «Молодым Папой» получится выгоднее)

24🔥6❤‍🔥5

13 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,750 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @bbe_schoolPhoto

Что объединяет Нолана, Хичкока и советских режиссеров? Вместе с журналом о кино ORNAMENT рассказываем, как теории и эксперименты советских режиссеров-авангардистов повлияли на язык мирового кино. И прослеживаем ключевые техники монтажа в примерах из классических и современных фильмов. → Забрать гайд и сформировать монтажное мышление.

17❤‍🔥6🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,810 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

На какую карточку из колоды «Фильмы, которые мы…» вы бы могли ответить «Домом дракона»?

34

12 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈1,350 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Закончился третий сезон «Дома драконов» и закончился с почти рекордно высокими оценками: 91% свежести на Rotten Tomatoes, на IMDb у трех серий из восьми оценка выше 9/10, а ниже 7.5/10 не опустился ни один эпизод. Но если почитать отзывы, то всё кажется не таким уж однозначным. Мы просмотрели русско- и англоязычные материалы и собрали самые популярные плюсы и минусы, которые отмечают зрители (иногда один и тот же пун

17🌚4

12 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈1,610 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Мы постарались избегать спойлеров, но всё-таки, если вы к ним особенно чувствительны, рекомендуем сохранить этот пост и вернуться после просмотра

22

11 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,580 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Дарим подарок к предзаказу дополнительного тиража! Обычно мы кладем подарки только в предзаказы новых номеров, но этим летом мы так вдохновились Тарантино на большом экране, что захотели всегда носить его с собой — и придумали объемный стикер. А поскольку одновременно с Тарантино идет предзаказ на номер о Стэнли Кубрике, то и он получил свой бонус. Так что дарим стикеры в подарок к предзаказам на ORNAMENT #6 КВЕНТИ

33😍6❤‍🔥5

11 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC≈2,500 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Киноязык Кристофера Нолана и эпический слог Гомера разделяют тысячелетия, однако сюжет «Одиссеи» не теряет своей актуальности: поиск пути домой, природа человеческих страстей, горечь утрат и хитрость, способная бросить вызов судьбе, продолжают волновать современного зрителя и читателя. Издательство «Носорог» совместно с Jaromír Hladík press выпустили «Одиссею» в новом переводе Григория Стариковского, над которым фил

34😁10❤‍🔥7🔥4

11 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 12 August 2026

Еще больше встреч, поводов и мест, для любителей кино! 💛

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @ornamentmag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 745 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ORNAMENT: журнал о кино” (@ornamentmag), 20,050 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ornamentmag.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.