Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Парс и фоны

Channel

Парс и фоны

@parslivres

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,257subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001123885332
TypeChannel
Username@parslivres
Description💛Говорим о книгах и насущном. 🦋https://youtube.com/@polinapars 📚 Книжные стикеры: https://t.me/addstickers/polinapars ✏️По вопросам рекламы (не книг❌): [email protected] Канал в перечне персональных страниц: https://clck.ru/3FPs3g
Created22 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/parslivres

Growth

25,25725,26425,260.56 August 2026 — 25,257 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,257 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,260 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,261 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,262 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,258 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,264 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,259 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,262 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,264 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,257 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 12 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,256–25,265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:5725,257-7
16 Aug 2026, 15:1325,264+2
14 Aug 2026, 21:5325,262+3
12 Aug 2026, 08:1825,259-5
11 Aug 2026, 06:0125,264+6
10 Aug 2026, 05:0225,258-4
9 Aug 2026, 04:2125,262+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:1725,261+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:1225,260+3
6 Aug 2026, 05:4025,257no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:3725,257first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.1%
avg views ÷ 25,257 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,120
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held32 (23 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total291,760
Reactions total11,673
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 02:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,380
Videos
108
Links
1,890

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

10,240 reactions across 29 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,81676.3%
💔2,42423.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,673reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 32 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @parslivres. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
9.38%
3 of 32 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
8,750
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
9,650
over 29 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjevV6Gb125 July 202625 July 2026
2W5zFFyE569127 July 202627 July 2026
2W5zFK8SGZF112 August 202612 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈4,160 views311 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Это вам за то, что не молитесь.

💔24269

16 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈5,310 views432 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Вернулась я из своего мини-отпуска, который наконец-то был похож на отпуск и отдых, а не на сдых. С чем я нас всех торжественно поздравляю, так как контент перестанет быть полумертвым. Слова «сдых» не существует, это мне когда-то приснился сон, в котором я обменивалась в каком-то замкнутом помещении с одним писателем записочками, и одну он передал мне с надписью «на случай сдыха».

406💔26

14 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈6,260 views208 reactions3 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Вместе со своим мужем Максимом Соня попадает в аварию, после чего начинает как-то более чутко чувствовать чужие эмоции. Еще одним триггером роста эмпатии становится пропажа старшей непутевой сестры Ольги. Соня целыми днями пытается выкарабкаться из этого полусна-полуреальности, в которую ее погружают назначения психотерапевта. Затем в чате группы поддержки переживших утрату Соня находит шестнадцатилетнего фотографа

190💔18

14 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈6,490 views368 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Чуть не прослезилась

256💔112

14 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC≈6,580 views367 reactions2 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Если вы обратили внимание на оглавление нового видео и задались вопросом, что за «психопатыч», то вот он. Запомните эту картинку, очень пригодится, когда будете читать «Бойся/Не бойся»🫠

331💔36

13 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈6,820 views118 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Video

«Что значит имя? Роза пахнет розой, хоть розой назови её, хоть нет» Но вот шекспировская Джульетта — совсем другое дело. Её образ постоянно переосмысливают даже на уровне обоняния. И очень кстати, потому что сейчас на Randewoo проходит День бренда Juliette has a Gun — скидки до -55% Джульетта нынче своенравна, ее оттенки разнообразны, например: Banana Rush — банановый десерт с кленовым сиропом, по-летнему, для люб

118

12 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈6,900 views323 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFK8SGZF

Вот и оно)) https://youtu.be/1J17OqE4kCc?si=OKwBE_qS_dAcazcQ

316💔7

12 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈7,260 views400 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

В целом у меня так и я взяла у себя три дня отпуска, но новое видео сегодня, конечно же, выйдет)

370💔30

11 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈7,700 views350 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

Чувствую, что это фанфик про Ричарда и Генри, но не могу это доказать. Пока не могу, прочитаю — и посмотрим. Очередная dark academia "в лучших традициях Донны-где-новый-роман-Тартт": главного героя, от лица которого идет повествование зовут Кристофер. Он сын чешских иммигрантов, не самый обеспеченный, но чертовски талантливый. Он поступает в Гарвард на полную стипендию, где его соседом становится бонвиван Люсьен. Лю

309💔41

10 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC≈7,930 views298 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

Дочитала, кстати. Это было очень хорошо. Подсоберу заметки в единую мысль, жахну коротульку потом. Если есть возможность читать на английском языке — читайте. Если нет — не читайте. Таков мой совет. https://t.me/parslivres/4758

277💔21

7 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC≈9,860 views115 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

А вот тут уже интереснее новости пошли) Если Олег Новиков нашел заступника для своих топов в лице, хоспади прости, Мединского, то это уже другой коленкор). https://t.me/litnov/2210

91💔24

7 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈10,000 views250 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

Трое фигурантов "дела издателей" получили условные сроки. Протопопов (также включенный в список тер. и экс.) получил 4 года условно. Условное и это "вышли", конечно, хотя радость ясна и понятна, разделяю. Но думаю, что условны и заголовки в духе "дело книгоиздателей завершено". Боюсь, это только начало. Ведь первой тройке из individuum/popcorn вменяли чуть ли не создание целого экстремитского лгбт, а теперь вот как

152💔98

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @parslivres. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,215 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Яндекс Книги
@booksyandex · 146,814
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Парс и фоны” (@parslivres), 25,257 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parslivres.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.