Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Не тот Панин

@nepanin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

451subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001577343558
TypeChannel
Username@nepanin
DescriptionПривет! Я Аркадий, возглавляю направление инвестиций в проекты ранней стадии в МТС, инвестор и предприниматель. Тут будут материалы про инновации, развитие стартапов, а также темы, которые интересуют меня лично. Мой контакт: @arpay
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nepanin

Growth

4517 Aug 2026, 12:44 — 451 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:02 — 451 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:448 Aug 2026, 05:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 450–452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:02451no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:44451first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
91
Videos
24
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 58s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

212 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9243.4%
🔥5827.4%
👍2511.8%
custom 5413451048452900505188.49%
😁167.55%
🥰20.943%
🤔10.472%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nepanin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 March 2026 to 8 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC353 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Где я был этот месяц? Смотрел, как зарабатывают на «мёртвых» стартапах 💀🚀 Пока все строят «убийцу ChatGPT», итальянцы из Bending Spoons вышли на Nasdaq с оценкой $18,4 миллиарда, подняв $1,7 млрд на IPO. И знаете, на чём? На чужих «мёртвых» приложениях. Их модель - полная противоположность стартаперской романтике. Они не придумывают продукты, они скупают уставшие активы (помните Evernote, который все похоронили?),

11custom 54134510484529005053🔥2

16 Jun 2026, 13:56 UTC706 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚀 ТОП-10 Стартап Академии №37 Завершилась 37-я Стартап Академия. Финальный рейтинг сформирован по самому честному принципу — объёму виртуальных инвестиций, которые инвесторы готовы подтвердить «рублём». В этот раз подача стала заметно сильнее: сказались и скачок нейросетей, и гибкость команд в упаковке смыслов. При этом в топе оказались и те, кто строил продукт «руками», доказывая силу классического трэкшена. Знак

11🔥6custom 54134510484529005055

16 May 2026, 14:51 UTC498 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Виральность 2026: разбор 3 механик, а не «они стрельнули» Читал лекцию в Сколково про виральность. Главная мысль, которую увёз сам: трафик дорожает каждый квартал, виральность стала вопросом выживания — но почти никто не может её повторить. Потому что копируют верхушку (механику), а работает корень (продуктовое решение до запуска). Разобрал 3 истории. что конкретно сделали и почему сработало. 1. Cluely: $0 → $6M A

5🔥3

24 Apr 2026, 09:20 UTC826 views30 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мой первый it стартап: как я пообещал миллион, не имея маркетинга 🧠🚀 Кажется, еще не рассказывал, но этот кейс я очень люблю разбирать на встречах с фаундерами. 7 лет назад был мой первый «подход к снаряду» — стартап «РеальнаяМозгокачка» (лицом проекта был Анатолий Вассерман). Сейчас я понимаю: мы просто слишком рано вышли на рынок. Суть: пользователи решали головоломки, соревновались в скорости и интеллекте, а по

21🔥6custom 54134510484529005052👍1

21 Apr 2026, 13:17 UTC465 viewsread 8 August 2026

Поделился мнением в комментариях. Как думаете единорог?

21 Apr 2026, 13:17 UTC440 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Аркадий Панин, бизнес-партнёр по инновациям MTS Startup Hub

🔥6

21 Apr 2026, 13:16 UTC404 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheedinorogblogVideo

🦄 Единорог ли? Выпуск 2 — «Синхронизация» Привет! Сегодня у нас второй выпуск новой рубрики «Единорог ли?». Продолжаем с вами изучать и оценивать резидентов MTS Startup Hub. Идея такая: фаундеры записывают кружки (здесь и в КОММЕНТАХ) про свои проекты. Вы их смотрите и голосуете, а сможет ли проект стать «единорогом» — вырасти 10х в ближайшие годы? На этой неделе — проект «Синхронизация» (@Synchronews) и его основ

🔥2

10 Apr 2026, 09:50 UTC483 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ИИ — больше не «вертикаль», а базовая гигиена стартапа 🦄 В среду выступал в ВШЭ: разбирали с ребятами методику анализа «единорогов» и то, как сегодня воспроизвести успех компаний-миллиардеров. Главный вывод — ландшафт изменился фундаментально. Если раньше ИИ был отдельным хайповым направлением, то в 2026 году это «дефолтная» технология. Сегодня это не преимущество, а базовое условие конкурентоспособности. Цифры го

custom 541345104845290050542

24 Mar 2026, 10:03 UTC478 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @prompt_design

Если посмотреть последний (зимний) батч стартапов в Y Combinator, можно заметить интересные тенденции, кстати, очень советую отслеживать идеи проектов, помогает держать нос по ветру: 1. 85% стартапов из 199 - только про ИИ, треть из них строит ИИ-агентов. Не чат-ботов. Не копайлотов. Полностью автономных агентов, которые заменяют сотрудников: ИИ-сейлзы (Cardinal), ИИ-инженеры, которые сами чинят инциденты в проде (I

🔥5👍4

23 Mar 2026, 13:50 UTC490 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚀 Эра ИИ-аватаров 2026: Маркетинговый и контент взрыв Помните времена, когда для съемки одного ролика нужны были студия, свет, петличка и бодрый спикер? В 2026-м это звучит как «отправлять письма голубем». Мы в эпицентре революции AI-Native Content, где цифровые аватары делают то, что не под силу человеку. 🔥 Яркие маркетинговые кейсы, которые меняют правила игры: Локализация 2.0 (Кейс глобальных брендов): Один и т

🔥62

22 Mar 2026, 09:31 UTC379 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Разговор с ребенком 9 лет: - У вас что проколото ухо? - Да. В молодости я хотел быть рок звездой 🤘 - Они же мало зарабатывают! - Поэтому пришлось снять..

😁15custom 54134510484529005054🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nepanin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,274,693 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Не тот Панин” (@nepanin), 451 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nepanin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.