New event added Sanctum App 2.0 Solana · SOL 01 Oct 2026 Impact 3/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/sanctum-app-2-0-11057197-2

Channel
CoinMarketCal Bot
@cmcal_bot
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,553subscribers
-633 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001350915658 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cmcal_bot |
| Description | Beep Bop! I am the official CoinMarketCal bot. My mission is to deliver the information from coinmarketcal.com. |
| Created | 31 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cmcal_bot |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 30,553 | -44 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 30,597 | -28 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 30,625 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 30,634 | -29 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 30,663 | -50 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 30,713 | -20 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 30,733 | -31 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:06 | 30,764 | -22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:08 | 30,786 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 30,803 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 30,819 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 30,834 | -19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 30,853 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 30,861 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 30,869 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 30,876 | -25 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 30,901 | -32 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 30,933 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 30,937 | -24 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 30,961 | first reading |
Engagement
1,089 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.39%
- avg views ÷ 30,553 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 119
- 450 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.486%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 450
- of 1,089 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 450 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,089 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 53,659 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,110
- Videos
- ≈10
- Links
- ≈91,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 80 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 75 | 92.6% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 7.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
New event added Y10k Curator Launch Morpho · MORPHO 27 Sep 2026 Impact 3/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/y10k-curator-launch-07360586-1
New event added dcinside Partnership MemeCore · M 27 Sep 2026 Impact 3.5/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/dcinside-partnership-80956602-1
New event added Emergency chain restart Zano · ZANO 27 Sep 2026 Impact 8/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/emergency-chain-restart-80964919-1
New event added Fixed-Rate Credit Morpho · MORPHO 27 Sep 2026 Impact 4/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/fixed-rate-credit-76696426-1
New event added Token Burn RHEA · RHEA 28 Sep 2026 Impact 3/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/token-burn-69026806-1
New event added Private TEE compute SOON · SOON 27 Sep 2026 Impact 4/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/private-tee-compute-57648228-1
New event added Litecoin VM deployment Metal Blockchain · METAL 26 Sep 2026 Impact 3/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/litecoin-vm-deployment-62283150-3
New event added Buyback Guidance Clarified Injective · INJ 26 Sep 2026 Impact 5.5/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/buyback-guidance-clarified-96805366-1
New event added Mainnet date reveal Atoshi · ATOS 30 Sep 2026 Impact 5/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/mainnet-date-reveal-38890129-1
New event added Brave Wallet integration NEAR Protocol · NEAR 26 Sep 2026 Impact 6/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/brave-wallet-integration-10659116-1
New event added RWAs on Robinhood Chain Collector Crypt · CARDS 26 Sep 2026 Impact 4/10 https://coinmarketcal.com/event/rwas-on-robinhood-chain-64218932-1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,089 posts we hold for @cmcal_bot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@cmcal_bot edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 22 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@cointelegraph · 333,873#1
@cryptodiffer · 23,554#2
@coindar · 11,230#3
@FORTUNETRADERS1 · 16,189#4
@cointrendz · 21,246#5
@cryptocalendar_pro · 2,609#6
@cryptodep · 12,948#7
@dogs · 7,065,215#8
@binance_announcements · 3,415,966#9
@blumcrypto · 14,188,780#10
@whale_alert_io · 300,107#11
@WhaleSniper · 60,264#12
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 324,743#13
@thebull_crypto · 174,931#14
@whalebotalerts · 144,669#15
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,390#16
@wiseadvicebysumit · 170,339#17
@thecryptoexpress · 258,705#18
@cryptoquant_alert · 71,021#19
@icodrops · 42,698#20
@BCUSAReal · 148,636#21
@unfolded · 117,442#22
@CoinMarketCapAnnouncements · 244,443#23
@next10xgem1 · 329,566#24
@cccio · 33,830#25
@cryptocrunch · 18,297#26
@Whalesguide · 200,022#27
@airdropfind · 534,407#28
@open4profit · 80,058#29
@REKTbinance · 20,084#30
@cryptoranknews · 678,604#31
@indocukong · 41,167#32
@layergg · 19,647#33
@ico_analytic · 56,869#34
@cointrendz_whalehunter · 24,152#35
@TCGFORYOU · 74,783#36
@coingape · 23,136#37
@cryptoquant_official · 55,749#38
@cryptobullet · 67,439#39
@news_crypto · 100,019#40
@WhaleTracker · 17,181#41
@tradeallcoin · 19,994#42
@cryptoamanclub · 104,044#43
@whalebotpumps · 15,951#44
@Tokenomist_Announce · 2,846#45
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 50,803#46
@CryptoKlondike · 59,571#47
@bitcoinexpertindia · 38,552#48
@top7ico · 24,393#49
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 179,783#50
@WallMonitor · 7,252#51
@whalescryptovip · 206,300#52
@freevipsignal · 3,529#53
@Crypto_Tigers1 · 26,156#54
@JackDorseyCoins · 22,114#55
@EarnWithSapna · 48,697#56
@yoyodexhaber · 39,948#57
@cryptonologyIndo · 19,073#58
@tomketloversreborn · 81,722#59
@kimoncrypto · 37,722#60
@bybit_announcements · 415,789#61
@RosePremiumm · 145,445#62
@CoinSonar · 9,643#63
@cryptoprofitcoach · 28,396#64
@gorilla_crypto · 192,465#65
@CycloneReversal · 4,515#66
@trust_announcements · 739,037#67
@CryptoPointHi · 29,640#68
@CryptoPotato · 6,092#69
@glassnode · 44,212#70
@CoinSonarV2 · 26,567#71
@CryptoCove · 29,047#72
@WatcherGuru · 628,516#73
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,588#74
@OfficiaLCryptoindia · 58,182#75
@rose · 85,706#76
@wublockchainenglish · 236,023#77
@saillytradinggroup · 43,123#78
@ninjanewstr · 87,490#79
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,355#80
@yoyowla · 84,936#81
@FishTheWhales · 7,894#82
@PAIDROSE · 141,377#83
@WhalessB · 2,007#84
@cryptoanalyst_ff · 6,530#85
@kaptencrypto707 · 93,064#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cointrendz · 21,246
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 September 2026
@cryptodiffer · 23,554
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
@cryptoprofitcoach · 28,396
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@WhaleSniper · 60,264
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
@indodax · 95,295
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@whalebotalerts · 144,669
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@coingape · 23,136
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
@cryptoquant_alert · 71,021
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
@www_Bitcoin_com · 54,443
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@CryptoWorldNews · 42,335
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
@cccio · 33,830
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
@binancesignalsturkeyyyy · 20,630
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
@OfficialPluang · 21,082
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 September 2026
@selcoin · 27,859
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
@CoinMarketCapAnnouncements · 244,443
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@Kadena_Announcements · 23,215
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 September 2026
@officialcryptodaily · 36,684
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
@Wallstreetcryptotrader · 99,412
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 324,743
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@thebull_crypto · 174,931
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CoinMarketCal Bot” (@cmcal_bot), 30,553 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cmcal_bot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.