Channel
@cryptotreysi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,978subscribers
-629 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001636846282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptotreysi |
| Description | Systematic crypto trading. Macro structure, live execution, real numbers. Own algo: 12 months live / 12 pairs / 4,218 trades / +312% / 2.41 Sharpe. Private pool — by invitation. 💌 Contact: @Treysi_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptotreysi |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 33,978 | -49 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 34,027 | -14 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 34,041 | -21 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 34,062 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 34,072 | -21 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 34,093 | -15 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 34,108 | -38 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 34,146 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 34,169 | -13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 34,182 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:27 | 34,194 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 34,203 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 34,215 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 34,226 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 34,234 | -12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 34,246 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 34,252 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 34,259 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 34,266 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 34,278 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
240 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 113 | 47.1% | |
| ❤ | 48 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 15.0% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 4.58% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 3.75% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 2.92% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 2.92% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 2.08% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.25% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.417% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
CRYPTO TREYSI pinned «quick rundown if you just landed here. systematic crypto trading. own algo, 12 months live. 12 pairs, spot and perps, 24/7 execution. the year on record: +312% total return 2.41 sharpe 14.3% max drawdown 51.7% win rate 4,218 trades best month +34.2%, worst…»
quick rundown if you just landed here. systematic crypto trading. own algo, 12 months live. 12 pairs, spot and perps, 24/7 execution. the year on record: +312% total return 2.41 sharpe 14.3% max drawdown 51.7% win rate 4,218 trades best month +34.2%, worst -8.1% what you'll find here: market structure reads, weekly trade scorecards, system snapshots. friday recaps log every call against actual outcomes, right and …
❤8🔥6⚡2
called this on apr 22. quote: "if btc holds above 78k through monday on real volume, we're out of the range." it broke. now $80,842. what changed structurally based on Ichimoku readings on the chart: — price is above the cloud. Span A at $77,782, current at $80,842. first time price has held above cloud since the october 2025 peak ran out of momentum. — tenkan ($78,887) is above kijun ($76,678) and both above the…
👍4❤2⚡1🔥1😁1
last weekend's btc post said the 78k break needed a hold to be real. otherwise the false-breakout scenario was on the table. you saw what happened. briefly above 79k saturday-sunday. rejected. now back at 77,473, sitting between 76 support and 78 resistance again. range still in charge. the trade i described as the most painful path, weak break followed by failure catching late longs at the top, that's what played …
👍5🎉3🏆1
btc just poked above 78k while everyone was asleep. 78,251. wrote earlier this week that the resolution of this range needed a clean break with volume. we have the break. volume part not confirmed yet. first 48 hours of a move like this is where most false breakouts get caught. price pops above the level, traders chase, and the whole move reverses back into the range by monday close. happens more often than people …
🔥4👍2🏆1🐳1😢1
tired of watching crypto guys only screenshot the wins and quietly delete the losses. so I'm putting mine on the record for a month. every call on this channel scored every friday. if I'm wrong you see it. already on the board from this morning. if eth holds 2385 it gets to 2721 by may 10. if 2385 breaks I'm looking at 2100-2200. btc call tomorrow. macro call thursday. first scorecard drops friday april 26. if t…
👍9🔥3⚡1❤1🎉1🏆1
ETH: deeper bleed, sharper bounce Yesterday covered BTC's resistance zone. ETH is a different setup. BTC at $77k is -40% from October ATH. ETH at $2,350 is -52% from August ATH of $4,946. Deeper drawdown, weaker cycle-to-date. But last 30 days tell a different story — ETH +10% vs BTC +2.3%. Short-term outperformance emerging. The technical read: — $2,385 was heavy resistance for 3 months. Last week it flipped. Pr…
⚡3👍3🐳2🏆1
BTC: back at the resistance zone A few weeks ago BTC was printing $70-73k at the support zone. Today it's back at $77,200 — over 5% on the week, testing the $74-78k resistance that rejected price multiple times in the last two months. This reads as mean-reversion from oversold, not trend continuation. Volume profile supports that: decent absorption at the lows, thin tape on the way up. Zooming out: BTC is still -4…
🔥9❤2⚡1🎉1🏆1
📊 System snapshot — April 15 24h: +0.94% Trades closed: 6 Open positions: 3 (2 BTC, 1 SOL) Win rate today: 66% While I was gone from the channel, the system wasn't. It traded every single day. Didn't care about my posting schedule. That's the whole point of automation — it doesn't need motivation. More updates coming daily from now on. #algotrading #crypto #tradingbot
⚡2❤1
BTC consolidating in a tightening range for 9 days. Bollinger bandwidth at 30-day low. Volume declining. Funding flat. Open interest rising. This is textbook compression. The spring is loading. Direction? The system doesn't guess. It waits for the break and rides whatever comes. Long or short — doesn't matter. Volatility is the product. Last three compressions this tight resolved with 12-18% moves. Median time to…
❤2👍1
Been quiet for a few days. Not because I ran out of things to say. Was heads down on infrastructure. The system needed upgrades — new execution layer, better fill optimization, capacity expansion for what's coming next. Boring stuff. The kind nobody posts about because it doesn't get likes. But it's the stuff that separates a hobby project from something that actually manages capital. Back to regular posting now. …
👍8🐳2
Numbers. No filters. No cropped “best month only” screenshots. This is the live equity curve of the system I spent months building. It runs 24/7 across 12 pairs. I check the dashboard with coffee in the morning. Some days I forget to check it at all. Since live launch: +312% total return 2.41 Sharpe ratio 14.3% max drawdown 51.7% win rate 4,218 trades Best month: +34.2% Worst month: -8.1% This is live execution.…
❤3🔥3👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptotreysi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO TREYSI” (@cryptotreysi), 33,978 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptotreysi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.