Channel
@kaptencrypto707
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
93,615subscribers
-79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001449635656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kaptencrypto707 |
| Description | Trader & Investor. Tidak buka kelas, tidak minta duit & tidak titip dana. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kaptencrypto707 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 93,615 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 93,619 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 93,621 | +27 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 93,594 | -36 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 93,630 | -22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:51 | 93,652 | -42 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 93,694 | first reading |
45 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (29 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 381,676 |
| Reactions total | 1,650 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,650 reactions across 45 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 795 | 48.2% | |
| ❤ | 411 | 24.9% | |
| 🤡 | 195 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 3.09% | |
| 🤣 | 42 | 2.55% | |
| 👎 | 25 | 1.52% | |
| 🫡 | 20 | 1.21% | |
| 🥴 | 19 | 1.15% | |
| 👀 | 15 | 0.909% | |
| 🕊 | 11 | 0.667% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 0.667% | |
| 🤪 | 10 | 0.606% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 0.485% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 0.485% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.364% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.242% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.182% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.182% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.121% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.121% | |
| 7 further kinds | 9 | 0.545% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,650reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kaptencrypto707. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Tether lolos audit KPMG ini kabar baik buat USDT dan XAUT setidaknya bisa terjamin lebih aman alias tidak tiba-tiba rugpull atau depeg karena selama ini kan banyak fud di Tether. Hal utama yang saya takutin dari trading cicilan emas tuh bukan harga emas turun, bahkan kalau harga emas turun ke $1000 saya bakal cicil terus kalau bisa all-in sekalian, hal yang saya takutkan tuh XAUT atau PAXG kenapa-napa alias rugpull …
👍5
Kap gimana Bitcoin kok turun lagi? Update analis asing masih sama selama bitcoin berada diatas $62,000 itu masih oke, kalau 62k jebol berarti harapan bullish ke 70k gagal.
👍6❤3🤡3
Kap grid trading emas ini kenapa ga pakai bot aja kok malah manual? Saya pernah coba bot spot grid XAUT dan hasilnya ga bagus karena volatilitas dia rendah, bot spot grid itu cocoknya dipakai di crypto volatilitas tinggi seperti HYPE dan LIT. Kalau XAUT ini menurut saya lebih cocok grid trading manual aja dan dikombinasi dengan analisa teknikal. Enaknya manual tuh lebih fleksibel kita bisa simpan dana dan skip cic…
👍6❤5
Kap gimana kalau harga emas makin turun? Ga takut! Karena emas sudah teruji harganya selama ribuan tahun bukan seperti crypto atau saham, harga emas mustahil ke nol bahkan menurut saya hampir mustahil dia turun ke $2000 lagi. Resiko trading cicilan emas hanya 1 yakni kalau PAXG atau XAUT rugpull, perusahaan paxos dan tethernya bangkrut baru trading ini gagal. Kalau mau trading PAXG atau XAUT bisa di Tokocrypto kar…
👍9❤3
Setiap serok saya catat di excel seperti ini.
👍6❤1🤔1🫡1
Sudah saya serok lagi trading cicilan emas untuk harga $4400 saya serok di harga $4361 lumayan diskon.
👍4❤1
Kap gimana BNB masih hold? BNB saya masih hold tapi kalau soal analisa teknikal BNB saya nyerah karena BNB ga bisa dianalisa teknikal, analis asing juga ga ada yang bahas BNB, jadi BNB itu tergantung kita percaya sama CZ atau tidak. BNB sampai saat ini masih di pompom CZ tuh 2 hari lalu masih dibahas di X sama CZ.
🤡16👍11❤3🤣1
Setelah beli saya tandai seperti itu di excel jadi XAUT cicilan harga $4500 saya beli di $4415, excel diatas hanya contoh sederhana aja, kalau excel yang saya pakai jauh lebih rumit dan detail daripada itu. Nanti kalau XAUT turun kebawah $4400 misalnya ke $4350 bakal saya beli disitu ibarat beli pas diskon, jadi saya ga beli tepat di harga $4400.
👍14❤5💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4
XAUT berhasil tembus $4400 berarti target selanjutnya ke $4500, oleh karena itu saya beli cicilan XAUT yang harga di $4500 di harga sekarang ibarat beli pas diskon.
👍13
Sudah dijual dan untung lagi lumayan kalau tiap hari begini terus.
👍17🤡6❤4😍1
Breaking News! Jumat 14 Agustus jam 9 malam.
🤔8👀4🙈2❤1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @kaptencrypto707. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 497,577 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kapten Saham Crypto 707” (@kaptencrypto707), 93,615 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaptencrypto707.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.