Channel
@cryptogg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
102,666subscribers
-428 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001184362289 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @cryptogg @loootmoney |
| Description | 🐋Crypto Since 2017 📥If Any Help/Collab: @GautamGupta1 Explore Our Web(500k+ Fam) : https://www.cryptogg.in/ •🪂Alpha(α) Airdrops •💎Hidden Gem •🕵️Analyst & Researcher •👾Nft Early Adopter-MOIM •🧵Threadoor •🌐Exploring Web3.0/Trends |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptogg |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 102,666 | -20 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 102,686 | -58 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 102,744 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 102,756 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 102,782 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 102,782 | -51 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 102,833 | -95 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 102,928 | -54 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:10 | 102,982 | -66 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 103,048 | -46 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 103,094 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 103,094 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (24 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 492,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🔥🔥 Aap Recording Bhi sun skte ho yadi aapne ama(space) miss krdia h to https://x.com/i/status/2086436183735943349 Bhut kch aapko seekhne ko bhi milega & Thank you all for coming 💙 Jldi hee kch krte h bda 🫡 @Cryptogg
🔥🔥 Aajao bhaiyo https://x.com/i/status/2086436183735943349 @Cryptogg
🔥🔥 Be Ready : 1hr left only https://x.com/i/status/2086009338477555967 @Cryptogg
🔥🔥 Claim OFC Again ( Airdrop - vesting ) https://t.me/cryptogg/56429 @Cryptogg
👍👍 14$ Trick Update (read till end).. Next time se aisa krunga kch trick hogi to in future vo pvt grp bnake krna hoga usme loyal/old users add krke post - bec "gg family" bhut badi h • Update1: Jisne withraw kia tha failed hogya hoga (and ab kyc maangrha hoga) - abhi kyc krlo (AADHAR se no need PAN) - then 24hr me withdraw krlena ho jaayega.. • Update2: Abhi koi bhi try mt krna ye trick new ones - try kroto 3-5day…
👍👍 New users deposit na krna usdc bec traffic ke kaaran withdrawal me thoda time lgra h - to btadunga jaise again jldi aayega withdrawal..
😱😱 Get Freee 14$-150$ for all users instant ( exclusive for gg fam) Must Watch video till the end 👍 EDIT: Rn, due to traffic it's not working- you can try after few days.. @Cryptogg
🫡🫡 Pure CT me aisa content koi dollar me bhi de to btadena yha freee me dia hu bs uski value krna and must read till end https://x.com/Gautamguptagg/status/2083802608607895771?s=20 + like, comment krdena mehnat keliye bs jisse aur tagde content/strategy laa sku.. ❤️ @Cryptogg
😱😱 Here we go Literally btara hu bhut jyada mehnat lgi h sirf aapke liye jisse self dependent ho jaao aap ❤️ https://x.com/Gautamguptagg/status/2083802608607895771?s=20 Bs like, comment krdena and must read krna - bhut tagda h 💎 @Cryptogg
🔥🔥 Update This week no more reward.. So, jaagna ni so jaana.. @Cryptogg
🔥🔥 Get Free Nowa token ( 0$ investment) Just do 3 simple social media task: https://app.nowa.finance/?ref=NOWA_05C3B0 Usdt rewards bhi aapko milenge aap task kroge to daily ke daily.. ⚠️ Connect Your burner wallet #Collab
😱🎁 Enjoy Kro ,Paid VPN freee me Connect Nepal server easily ho jaayega. Ye chize jo btara hu aage bhi bhut helpful hogi aisa ni isi chiz me so remember 🔥💎 @Cryptogg
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptogg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 349,370 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💰💰 CryptoGG ❤️❤️” (@cryptogg), 102,666 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptogg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.