Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кукояка на связи♥️

Channel

Кукояка на связи♥️

@Panarinka

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

77,365subscribers

-1,918 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275813861
TypeChannel
Username@Panarinka
DescriptionПроходите, разувайтесь) Чай будете☕️? Для сотрудничества [email protected] Регистрация в перечне владельцев страниц в соцсетях: https://clck.ru/3GAHpR
Created2 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Panarinka

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

77,36579,28378,3246 August 2026 — 79,283 subscribers6 August 2026 — 79,283 subscribers7 August 2026 — 79,238 subscribers8 August 2026 — 79,163 subscribers9 August 2026 — 79,109 subscribers10 August 2026 — 79,062 subscribers11 August 2026 — 79,036 subscribers12 August 2026 — 78,988 subscribers14 August 2026 — 78,928 subscribers15 August 2026 — 78,878 subscribers16 August 2026 — 78,942 subscribers18 August 2026 — 78,913 subscribers18 August 2026 — 78,852 subscribers19 August 2026 — 78,837 subscribers20 August 2026 — 78,761 subscribers21 August 2026 — 78,729 subscribers23 August 2026 — 78,647 subscribers24 August 2026 — 78,557 subscribers25 August 2026 — 78,519 subscribers27 August 2026 — 78,475 subscribers27 August 2026 — 78,471 subscribers29 August 2026 — 78,449 subscribers30 August 2026 — 78,387 subscribers31 August 2026 — 78,346 subscribers1 September 2026 — 78,272 subscribers2 September 2026 — 78,250 subscribers3 September 2026 — 78,208 subscribers4 September 2026 — 78,161 subscribers8 September 2026 — 78,062 subscribers11 September 2026 — 77,914 subscribers13 September 2026 — 77,811 subscribers14 September 2026 — 77,760 subscribers16 September 2026 — 77,681 subscribers19 September 2026 — 77,586 subscribers25 September 2026 — 77,365 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net -1,918. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,077–79,571 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 09:3877,365-221
19 Sept 2026, 02:3877,586-95
16 Sept 2026, 13:5777,681-79
14 Sept 2026, 18:0077,760-51
13 Sept 2026, 00:5777,811-103
11 Sept 2026, 03:5577,914-148
8 Sept 2026, 02:5778,062-99
4 Sept 2026, 23:5778,161-47
3 Sept 2026, 09:2378,208-42
2 Sept 2026, 01:3178,250-22
1 Sept 2026, 03:2878,272-74
31 Aug 2026, 05:4478,346-41
30 Aug 2026, 02:4878,387-62
29 Aug 2026, 00:1478,449-22
27 Aug 2026, 21:3478,471-4
27 Aug 2026, 00:3678,475-44
25 Aug 2026, 23:5478,519-38
24 Aug 2026, 21:4878,557-90
23 Aug 2026, 09:4378,647-82
21 Aug 2026, 20:0678,729first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 77,365 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,880
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held61 (25 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total204,280
Reactions total4,263
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,570
Videos
≈626
Links
≈1,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 06s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,256 reactions across 61 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8,93672.9%
🔥1,0978.95%
💋1,0748.76%
🤩3542.89%
🤗2932.39%
🎉2221.81%
🍾1841.50%
🆒440.359%
🤔370.302%
🤮130.106%
🖕20.016%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.64%
1 of 61 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
10,600
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
9,320
over 60 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvZhKTQ15 August 20265 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 21:29 UTC≈3,550 views164 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @kukoyakaVideo

Чет не спросил у вас, вы трек то новый слушаете? Оцените от 1 до 10!

❤143🔥14🎉7

18 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC≈7,660 views83 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @kukoyakaPhoto

ГЛАВНЫЙ ХИТ ОСЕНИ Премьера: Barabanov, ХЛЕБ, KOJI – Послэмись со мной !!!!! Слушать: https://band.link/poslamissomnoi

❤64🔥10💋9

17 Sept 2026, 12:52 UTC≈9,720 views118 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Я прочла книгу, мне оочень понравилась она))) прям правда советую )))) я будто дневник девушки с лишним весом прочла))) наличие юмора вообще огонь👍🏼

❤118

16 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTC≈9,320 views259 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Привет Екб))

❤208🤗24💋15🔥12

16 Sept 2026, 04:18 UTC≈9,190 views199 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Планы на полет))

❤173🍾22💋4

16 Sept 2026, 04:17 UTC≈8,390 views105 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Первый раз лечу одна😅✈️

❤105

15 Sept 2026, 18:09 UTC≈8,490 views160 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Сегодня премьера большого очень полезно проекта для деток, где Васюша рассказывает важные вещи. Простым языком и в формате игры о важном. Не видела ничего похожего для детей 💙 Если у вас есть детки - покажите им обязательно! Очень горжусь! Васюша так выросла 🥹 Своё шоу уже снимает! Невероятно 😍💙 Смотрите «Василиса Кукояка о важном»

❤117🔥43

11 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC≈10,600 views185 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Дочитала) Очень рекомендую к прочтению. Прям лучшее, что я читала))

❤158💋17🔥10

11 Sept 2026, 06:38 UTC≈9,520 views106 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Выбираю между двух хирургов Ванушко и Бельцевич) Может кто был у них?

❤90🤔12💋3🔥1

11 Sept 2026, 06:33 UTC≈9,070 views152 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Приветики)) а я вышла от эндокринолоога. Заключение такое: Показаний к удалению острых нет, но ждать тоже нет смысла. Узел может еще вырасти. Поэтому лучше всё же удалять щитовидку. Теперь надо на консультацию к хирургу, чтобы понять нужно ли сделать тест дополнительный на злокачественность узла перед операцией. А на сентябрь уже нет записи, вот уж популярное место😅

❤81🤩43🤗17🤔11

10 Sept 2026, 13:19 UTC≈8,650 views97 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Заказала эту книгу Тани Столяр еще месяц назад, жду очень🤗

💋67❤21🎉9

10 Sept 2026, 13:18 UTC≈8,740 views103 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @zashmotPhoto

Светский аншлаг на презентации книги Тани Столяр «Я есть жир» в галерее Алины Пинской! Там же выставлены работы, которые стали иллюстрациями к автобиографии ее тела. Уже не терпится поскорее прочитать!! Таня, поздравляю! Это вау

❤89💋14

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @Panarinka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rain_Dasha
@rain_dasha · 27,742
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 10 September 2026
Кукояка
@kukoyaka · 89,687
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 August 2026
Привет, Это Я МАША✌️😃 / Masha Zoom / Маша Зум
@itsmashazoom · 134,849
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 August 2026
Маша Хрипко
@mkhripko · 26,329
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 September 2026
Aziza
@AMinekaeva · 33,738
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
Женат на Марине
@zhenatnamarine1234 · 223,422
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 15 August 2026
АНЯ POKROV🥑
@pokrov90avocado · 253,446
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 10 August 2026
MezenovaFaM💜
@mezenovafam · 68,102
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
Света Марсель
@sveta_marsel · 189,462
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 16 August 2026
Карина Палецких
@lifekarina · 252,613
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
Victoria Portfolio
@victoriaportfolio · 25,472
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 September 2026
Регина Путешественница 🌍
@todorenkoregina · 98,623
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Pushman
@pushmanjulia · 183,724
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 11 August 2026
Маш Милаш
@mash_milash_tg · 115,687
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 September 2026
МАША БЕЗ МЕДВЕДЯ
@masha51 · 29,797
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 7 September 2026
IdaGalich
@GALICH_onok · 285,492
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Elmofeo Life
@elmofeo_life · 25,377
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 September 2026
Karina Kasparyants
@karinaVIP · 171,988
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 August 2026
Fancy smth
@fancysmth · 48,216
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
✨ADUSHCLUB✨ Катя Адушкина
@Adushkinaa · 87,567
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
ДИМАС БЛОГ
@dimasblog333 · 269,923
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
Виталия Корниенко
@VitaliyaKornienko · 44,455
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
Я Ириска
@iriskalimei · 87,990
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 17 August 2026
КЛАВА КОКА
@klavacoca · 253,555
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 65 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кукояка на связи♥️” (@Panarinka), 77,365 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Panarinka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.