Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кукояка на связи♥️

Channel

Кукояка на связи♥️

@Panarinka

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

77,503subscribers

-1,780 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001275813861
TypeChannel
Username@Panarinka
DescriptionПроходите, разувайтесь) Чай будете☕️? Для сотрудничества [email protected] Регистрация в перечне владельцев страниц в соцсетях: https://clck.ru/3GAHpR
Created2 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Panarinka

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

76,07779,28377,68077,5036 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -1,780. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,596–79,764 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 13:1677,503-92
9 Nov 2026, 14:3677,595-76
8 Nov 2026, 06:0177,671-55
6 Nov 2026, 23:4077,726-90
5 Nov 2026, 21:1077,816-86
4 Nov 2026, 19:2977,902-403
3 Nov 2026, 22:3578,305-85
2 Nov 2026, 19:3878,390+48
1 Nov 2026, 21:0478,342-21
31 Oct 2026, 22:3678,363-27
30 Oct 2026, 22:5678,390+43
29 Oct 2026, 20:3878,347+1,689
28 Oct 2026, 23:5876,658+7
27 Oct 2026, 20:5676,651+24
26 Oct 2026, 20:4776,627+305
25 Oct 2026, 19:3076,322+245
24 Oct 2026, 22:0676,077-32
23 Oct 2026, 20:0676,109-27
22 Oct 2026, 21:5076,136-67
21 Oct 2026, 15:3176,203first reading

Engagement

101 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 77,503 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,200
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 101 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held101 (25 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total196,730
Reactions total3,672
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 08:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,610
Videos
≈651
Links
≈1,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 51s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

18,655 reactions across 101 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤13,86774.3%
💋1,4017.51%
🔥1,3697.34%
🤩4012.15%
🤗3101.66%
🍾2741.47%
🎉2351.26%
👍2251.21%
🥰2251.21%
😭1550.831%
🤔820.44%
🆒670.359%
💯170.091%
🤮150.08%
👎90.048%
🖕30.016%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.98%
2 of 101 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
8,020
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
9,050
over 99 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvZhKTQ15 August 20265 August 2026
2W5zFHPc9cV11 October 20261 October 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (4.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 08:13 UTC850 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤18👎4

12 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,800 views54 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Приветики)) как ты? Погодка в Москве прям бээээээ☔️ В Питере так же?

❤38🤩10👍3💋3

10 Nov 2026, 11:06 UTC≈4,780 views121 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Ӗ маё, вчера не разыграла два билета на концерт ХЛЕБУШКА😲 Но я обязательно это сделаю🤗💪🏼

❤91👍21🔥9

9 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC≈4,360 views76 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @hlebmusic

Офигеть, концерт в Питере уже на этой неделе! Очень ждём встречи с вами 😍 Билеты: http://light-music.ru/xlyeb

❤62👍11🔥3

6 Nov 2026, 14:54 UTC≈8,500 views103 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Следующий розыгрыш билетов в понедельник 🤗 Не пропусти))))💃🏼

❤77💋14🥰8👍4

6 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC≈7,760 views169 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

В первом розыгрыше ответ был Чай и ответ был на фото)) Отгадываем теперь сколько лет группе хлеб?

❤140👍24🤩4🥰1

6 Nov 2026, 09:06 UTC≈6,810 views118 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @hlebmusicVideo

НИХАО 13.11.26

❤78💋21👍13🔥6

5 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC≈7,240 views146 reactionsread 12 November 2026

У меня скоро праздник и не только у меня🤗, я уже себе подарок выбираю)))) Но параллельное и о вас думаю)) Знаете, что решила)) Мамы из Питера, кто хочет на концерт группы ХЛЕБ? Отзовитесь в комментариях)) Ну и кто реально может пойти)) Концерт, напоминаю 14.11(суббота ) в 20:00)) Я там БУДУУУУ)))

❤116👍24💋6

4 Nov 2026, 16:55 UTC≈7,250 views122 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Ну что, кому достанутся первые два билета на концерт любимой группы ХЛЕБ??? Угадай любимый напиток ребят(подсказка на картинке)

❤107👍14😭1

3 Nov 2026, 20:04 UTC≈7,780 views177 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Маловато ответов конешн, ну ладно)) Планирую разыграть 6 билетов)) Завтра первые два))

❤127💋24🔥19👍7

3 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC≈8,070 views177 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Кто идет на концерт ХЛЕБ в Питере?

❤122💋26😭19👍10

2 Nov 2026, 20:09 UTC≈9,300 views344 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Не хочу холода🤧

❤249👍39💋35🔥16🥰5

Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @Panarinka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @Panarinka as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
6 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rain_Dasha
@rain_dasha · 26,861
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 10 September 2026
Кукояка
@kukoyaka · 88,807
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 August 2026
Привет, Это Я МАША✌️😃 / Masha Zoom / Маша Зум
@itsmashazoom · 133,372
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 August 2026
Маша Хрипко
@mkhripko · 25,848
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 September 2026
Aziza
@AMinekaeva · 36,266
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
Женат на Марине
@zhenatnamarine1234 · 216,818
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 15 August 2026
АНЯ POKROV🥑
@pokrov90avocado · 241,594
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 10 August 2026
MezenovaFaM💜
@mezenovafam · 70,156
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
Света Марсель
@sveta_marsel · 184,772
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 16 August 2026
Карина Палецких
@lifekarina · 245,737
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
Victoria Portfolio
@victoriaportfolio · 24,969
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 September 2026
Регина Путешественница 🌍
@todorenkoregina · 97,174
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Pushman
@pushmanjulia · 177,721
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 11 August 2026
Маш Милаш
@mash_milash_tg · 112,034
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 September 2026
МАША БЕЗ МЕДВЕДЯ
@masha51 · 28,931
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 7 September 2026
IdaGalich
@GALICH_onok · 278,336
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
AgataMucenieceLife
@AgataMucenieceLife · 64,833
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 October 2026
Elmofeo Life
@elmofeo_life · 25,331
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 September 2026
Karina Kasparyants
@karinaVIP · 165,157
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 August 2026
Fancy smth
@fancysmth · 47,785
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
✨ADUSHCLUB✨ Катя Адушкина
@Adushkinaa · 85,389
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
ДИМАС БЛОГ
@dimasblog333 · 264,520
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
Виталия Корниенко
@VitaliyaKornienko · 44,040
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
Я Ириска
@iriskalimei · 87,397
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 69 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кукояка на связи♥️” (@Panarinka), 77,503 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Panarinka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.