Not prod — о том, как идея становится вещью Точная посадка, сложный крой, контраст мягких и жёстких материалов здесь работают не как самостоятельные эффекты, а как инструменты... https://teletype.in/@delahautecouture/fExYk2NDooJ
❤🔥4❤3🔥2

Channel
@newcut0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
741subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003474745844 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @newcut0 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 17 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/newcut0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 741 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 744 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 744 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 17 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
239 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 93 | 38.9% | |
| 🔥 | 84 | 35.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 10.0% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 4.60% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 3.77% | |
| 🤝 | 9 | 3.77% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.837% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.837% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.418% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Not prod — о том, как идея становится вещью Точная посадка, сложный крой, контраст мягких и жёстких материалов здесь работают не как самостоятельные эффекты, а как инструменты... https://teletype.in/@delahautecouture/fExYk2NDooJ
❤🔥4❤3🔥2
Видео с финала NEW CUT уже вышло! Если вы пропустили финал 17 января или хотите заново погрузиться в атмосферу того дня— этот ролик для вас. Будем очень признательны вашей поддержке. Желаем вам приятного просмотра!
❤🔥9🔥6🍓2
Айшат — о том, как материал становится формой В речи Айшат нет стремления усложнять высказывание ради эффекта. Скорее наоборот: всё внимание сосредоточено на том, как вещь собирается... https://teletype.in/@delahautecouture/XGsPIficJrj
🔥10❤3💘2
Мария — о дисциплине Антверпена, языке архива и меланхолии как форме В её речи нет желания «шокировать» и нет привычного для моды самовлюблённого манифеста. Скорее — спокойная, почти упрямая вера... https://teletype.in/@delahautecouture/2hKWnp8Navc
❤12❤🔥2
https://teletype.in/@delahautecouture/kt_HfgNh-9V
🔥13❤🔥2💯2
Начинаем череду статьей с призерами конкурса. Будем рады вашим репостам и любой активности связанной с публикациями. Поверьте, начинающим дизайнерам очень нужна и важна поддержка на начальных стадиях. На протяжении месяца будут выходить статьи с каждым из дизайнеров. Также скоро выложим видеоролик с мероприятия. Ещё раз всем большое спасибо за такую поддержку и активность!
🔥7❤🔥5🤩2
Огромное спасибо всем, кто приобрёл билеты на лекторий. Как и обещали, часть средств мы выделили на призовые места. Вместо символических призов в формате плакатов 4 месту — Not prod и 5 месту — Yara Di мы выделяем по 10 000 рублей каждому. На дополнительные номинации, к сожалению, уже не хватает финансовых ресурсов, чтобы тоже обеспечить их призами. Мне кажется для первого раза получилось достаточно неплохо. Надеюсь…
🔥13❤7💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤝9🔥7
Ну что же, прошло уже три дня с момента мероприятия — можно спокойно подвести итоги. К сожалению, у нас не было возможности лично вручить призы призёрам по простой причине: все три первых места не смогли присутствовать на мероприятии очно. Но это никак не влияет на результаты — никакой ротации или изменений не будет. Всё остаётся так, как было объявлено. Призовые места: 1 место — Мария Мильман Приз: 50 000 ₽ Перев…
🔥14❤13💘7
Спасибо команде проекта «Сделано в России» за поддержку New cut и за инициативу, которая помогает развивать креативную индустрию и подсвечивать авторов по всей стране. В рамках дополнительной номинации команда «Сделано в России» выбрала 5 участников, которым предоставят возможность публикации в проекте — чтобы рассказать о себе, своём деле и творческом пути. В список вошли: • CYLCH • YARA • Анфиса Прокудина • Айшат…
❤17🔥7❤🔥2
New cut pinned a photo
Мы знаем, что среди вас очень много креативных людей. Вчера сложилось ощущение, что почти каждый так или иначе связан с модой и работает в этой сфере. У всех разный путь, опыт и формат деятельности, но именно в этом и есть суть знакомств и общения. Если вчера не получилось познакомиться с кем-то на мероприятии, у вас есть возможность сделать это в чате. Там такие же творческие люди, как и вы, открытые к диалогу, со…
❤14🔥5🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @newcut0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 832,703 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“New cut” (@newcut0), 741 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newcut0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.