Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

New cut

@newcut0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

741subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003474745844
TypeChannel
Username@newcut0
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 17 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/newcut0

Growth

741744742.57 August 2026 — 744 subscribers8 August 2026 — 744 subscribers15 August 2026 — 741 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 741–744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:27741-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:02744no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:03744first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 17 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

239 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9338.9%
🔥8435.1%
❤‍🔥2410.0%
💯114.60%
💘93.77%
🤝93.77%
👍41.67%
🍓20.837%
🤩20.837%
🥰10.418%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Apr 2026, 18:13 UTC347 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Not prod — о том, как идея становится вещью Точная посадка, сложный крой, контраст мягких и жёстких материалов здесь работают не как самостоятельные эффекты, а как инструменты... https://teletype.in/@delahautecouture/fExYk2NDooJ

❤‍🔥43🔥2

16 Apr 2026, 16:08 UTC516 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Видео с финала NEW CUT уже вышло! Если вы пропустили финал 17 января или хотите заново погрузиться в атмосферу того дня— этот ролик для вас. Будем очень признательны вашей поддержке. Желаем вам приятного просмотра!

❤‍🔥9🔥6🍓2

14 Apr 2026, 16:02 UTC454 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Айшат — о том, как материал становится формой В речи Айшат нет стремления усложнять высказывание ради эффекта. Скорее наоборот: всё внимание сосредоточено на том, как вещь собирается... https://teletype.in/@delahautecouture/XGsPIficJrj

🔥103💘2

24 Feb 2026, 16:10 UTC834 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мария — о дисциплине Антверпена, языке архива и меланхолии как форме В её речи нет желания «шокировать» и нет привычного для моды самовлюблённого манифеста. Скорее — спокойная, почти упрямая вера... https://teletype.in/@delahautecouture/2hKWnp8Navc

12❤‍🔥2

11 Feb 2026, 17:05 UTC772 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @pretprter

https://teletype.in/@delahautecouture/kt_HfgNh-9V

🔥13❤‍🔥2💯2

11 Feb 2026, 17:05 UTC645 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Начинаем череду статьей с призерами конкурса. Будем рады вашим репостам и любой активности связанной с публикациями. Поверьте, начинающим дизайнерам очень нужна и важна поддержка на начальных стадиях. На протяжении месяца будут выходить статьи с каждым из дизайнеров. Также скоро выложим видеоролик с мероприятия. Ещё раз всем большое спасибо за такую поддержку и активность!

🔥7❤‍🔥5🤩2

28 Jan 2026, 16:28 UTC933 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Огромное спасибо всем, кто приобрёл билеты на лекторий. Как и обещали, часть средств мы выделили на призовые места. Вместо символических призов в формате плакатов 4 месту — Not prod и 5 месту — Yara Di мы выделяем по 10 000 рублей каждому. На дополнительные номинации, к сожалению, уже не хватает финансовых ресурсов, чтобы тоже обеспечить их призами. Мне кажется для первого раза получилось достаточно неплохо. Надеюсь

🔥137💯1

20 Jan 2026, 15:01 UTC845 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну что же, прошло уже три дня с момента мероприятия — можно спокойно подвести итоги. К сожалению, у нас не было возможности лично вручить призы призёрам по простой причине: все три первых места не смогли присутствовать на мероприятии очно. Но это никак не влияет на результаты — никакой ротации или изменений не будет. Всё остаётся так, как было объявлено. Призовые места: 1 место — Мария Мильман Приз: 50 000 ₽ Перев

🔥1413💘7

19 Jan 2026, 15:02 UTC706 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо команде проекта «Сделано в России» за поддержку New cut и за инициативу, которая помогает развивать креативную индустрию и подсвечивать авторов по всей стране. В рамках дополнительной номинации команда «Сделано в России» выбрала 5 участников, которым предоставят возможность публикации в проекте — чтобы рассказать о себе, своём деле и творческом пути. В список вошли: • CYLCH • YARA • Анфиса Прокудина • Айшат

17🔥7❤‍🔥2

18 Jan 2026, 21:00 UTC864 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы знаем, что среди вас очень много креативных людей. Вчера сложилось ощущение, что почти каждый так или иначе связан с модой и работает в этой сфере. У всех разный путь, опыт и формат деятельности, но именно в этом и есть суть знакомств и общения. Если вчера не получилось познакомиться с кем-то на мероприятии, у вас есть возможность сделать это в чате. Там такие же творческие люди, как и вы, открытые к диалогу, со

14🔥5🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @newcut0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 832,703 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“New cut” (@newcut0), 741 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newcut0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.