Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Back To The Future 디터

@monsjae

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

156subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001406772319
TypeChannel
Username@monsjae
Description좋게 보는 회사의 기록지 입니다 인사이트는 없습니다.
Created25 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/monsjae

Growth

1567 Aug 2026, 19:55 — 156 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:31 — 156 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:558 Aug 2026, 18:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 155–157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:31156no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:55156first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.83%
avg views ÷ 156 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.7
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total213
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,100
Videos
91
Links
3,650

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC9 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ryu1moo2

메모리의 Peak EPS는 정말 지금일까? https://m.blog.naver.com/teasky0221/224370769966 #필승 님

8 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @moneybottlePhoto

마이크론 주주환원은 FCF 100%로 내년 기준 140조원을 초과할 예정 이는 애플과 엔비디아의 합산을 훨씬 초과하여 현재 주가 기준 배당률이 10%를 넘을수 있음 삼성전자는 여태까지 FCF의 50%를 주주환원에 사용했음

🐳1

8 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cahier_de_marketPhoto

제본스 역설 작동 중 : - GPT-5.6 Luna는 OpenRouter에서 가격이 10분의 1로 인하된 이후 토큰 사용량이 10배로 증가 - 아직 이번 주가 끝나지 않았기 때문에, 현재 추세대로라면 최종적으로 10배를 넘어설 것으로 예상 - 또한 GLM 5.2의 토큰 사용량도 추월 https://x.com/i/status/2085756417353412922

8 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @teamctrinePhoto

번스타인은 중국의 인공지능(AI) 투자액이 2030년에 6천억 달러에 달할 것으로 전망했다.

7 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026

#반도체 #주주환원 #씹배님 https://blog.naver.com/tenbagger10x/224370724383

7 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026

#AI #발린님 토큰과 Q https://m.blog.naver.com/muziq/224370974829

7 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC8 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @HANAchina

>>마이크론 경영진, 강한 자신감 표명… “메모리 시스템 가치 50% 넘어”, CPU AI 에이전트 수요는 “시즌 전 워밍업 단계” •도이체방크는 FMS 2026 플래시 메모리 서밋에서 마이크론 경영진과 면담한 결 과 공개. 마이크론은 AI가 메모리 산업을 시스템 아키텍처의 핵심으로 영구적으로 재편하고 있으며, DRAM과 NAND 모두 공급 부족 상태라고 진단 •또한 시스템에서 메모리가 차지하는 가치 비중이 이미 약 50%까지 상승했으며, AI 확산이 메모리 산업의 가치 재평가를 더욱 가속화하고 있다고 설명. CPU 기반 AI 에이전트 수요는 아직 “시즌 전 워밍업” 단계에 불과해 향후 성장 여력이 크다고 평가 •도이체방크는 마이크론이 수익성을 희생하지 않고도 성장을 이어갈 수 있는 ‘사치재 같은 가격 결정력(Luxury Advantag

7 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC8 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

삼성전자 2016~2018년 주가 vs 2025년 7월 이후 주가 • 신규 증설이 메모리 주가 수익률의 변곡점

7 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC6 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @teamctrinePhoto

골드만삭스는 향후 몇 분기 동안 빅테크 기업들의 잉여현금흐름이 강력하게 반등할 것으로 전망하고 있습니다.

7 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC3 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupinPhoto

모건 스탠리 - 메모리 지금까지 메모리 산업에서 나타난 가장 가파른 조정은 마무리에 접어든 것으로 보이며, 다음 주가 상승 촉매제(Catalyst)로서 자사주 매입으로 관심이 이동하고 있습니다. 당사는 이를 사이클 노후화(성숙기) 과정에서 나타나는 자연스러운 일부분, 즉 작고 일시적인 차질 정도로 바라봅니다. 현재 밸류에이션은 매력적인 전술적 재진입 기회를 제공합니다.

7 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC2 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupinPhoto

골드만삭스, HBM 단가 폭등 및 프리미엄 재확대 (2027~2028년 전망) 2027년 HBM ASP는 전년 대비 약 2배 폭등. 차세대 HBM 고성능화 및 AI 시장의 본격적인 수급 불균형으로 인해 범용 DRAM과의 격차를 다시 $1.0/Gb 이상으로 크게 벌릴 것으로 전망

7 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hslpartners

[당신은 얼마나 간절한가] 객관적 팩트를 먼저 보자. 반도체 주가는 폭락했다. 그런데 펀더멘털은 더 강해졌다. 메모리 공급부족 구조는 그대로고, HBM 커스텀화는 살아있고, 초장기 계약은 훼손되지 않았다. 조정이 진행되는 동안에도 하이퍼스케일러들의 캐펙스는 늘었고, AI 수요는 꺾이지 않았다. 주가와 펀더멘털이 반대 방향으로 움직이고 있다. 이것이 지금 시장이 보내는 가장 중요한 신호다. 그런데 투자자들이 급해졌다. V자 반등을 기대한다. 빨리 올라야 한다고, 왜 안 오르냐고. 그런데 시장은 급한 사람 편이 아니다. 이제 수급을 주도하는 건 개인도, 정부 정책도 아니다. 외국인이다. 그리고 외국인은 서두르지 않는다. 개인을 털면서, 조용히, 천천히 올린다. 완만한 기울기. 그것이 지금부터의 시장이 그릴 그림이다. 3분기 조정을 거

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @monsjae. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,019,896 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Back To The Future 디터” (@monsjae), 156 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monsjae.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.