Channel
@dailyexpose
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28,397subscribers
-72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001339147628 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dailyexpose |
| Description | Reporting the facts that the mainstream refuse to... Official telegram channel for The Expose |
| Created | 26 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dailyexpose |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 28,397 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 28,406 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 28,414 | -30 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 28,444 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 28,449 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 28,463 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 28,462 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 28,469 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (30 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 61,016 |
| Reactions total | 659 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
659 reactions across 39 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 184 | 27.9% | |
| 🤬 | 117 | 17.8% | |
| ❤ | 68 | 10.3% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 7.74% | |
| 👎 | 42 | 6.37% | |
| 💩 | 42 | 6.37% | |
| 🖕 | 26 | 3.95% | |
| 🤡 | 23 | 3.49% | |
| 😈 | 21 | 3.19% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 2.73% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 2.58% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 2.43% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 1.82% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 1.06% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 0.91% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 0.759% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.303% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.152% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.152% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 659reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
230 illegal migrants on one dinghy: What does this tell us about the nature of illegal immigration to the UK via the Channel? The 230 migrants packed onto a record-breaking mega-dinghy show how radically Channel migration has changed: fewer boats are getting through, but each carry far more people and launch areas now stretch into Belgium. Behind the crossings is an increasingly professional industry, largely run b…
83% say they would leave Iran Unofficial estimates say 8 million people have already left Iran for greener pastures, and according to recent polls, millions more say they would do the same. A recent poll on Instagram showed that 83% of Iranians would leave Iran if given the opportunity due to persistent inflation, eroding purchasing power, limited job opportunities and social repression... https://expose-news.com/…
❤3🤣2👎1🔥1
ECB is intensifying its war on humanity using climate regulations, despite a global collapse in “green” finance The European Central Bank and the Bank of England are intensifying climate and nature-related financial regulations despite the IPCC retiring its extreme global warming scenarios and a broader retreat from ESG-focused finance. Recently, the ECB announced it would raise interest rates on loans to companies…
😈9❤1
Under zero net migration, the EU population would be 32% smaller by the end of the century, the European Commission says Last month, the European Commission published a report about the demographic changes that are fundamentally reshaping Europe. In it, Epimetheus points out, the Commission is admitting that the massive social engineering project of the past 2-3 decades – called invariably mass migration, migration…
😈6🔥3
Cinnamon and ginger in yoghurt are good for regulating blood sugar A recent study suggests that adding cinnamon and ginger to yoghurt may increase specific gut bacteria linked to improved blood sugar control and appetite regulation... https://expose-news.com/2026/08/11/cinnamon-and-ginger-in-yoghurt-are-good/
👍15❤4
UN’s Green Climate Fund isn’t “Green” or about “Climate”; it’s just a UN Fund The UN Green Climate Fund isn’t “green” nor is it about the climate. It is simply foreign aid under another name. David Wojick explains why and concludes, “It makes no sense for donor countries to run billions of dollars of their limited foreign aid money through the fraudulent and wasteful Green Climate Fund"... https://expose-news.com…
👍14
“Rudderless” climate activists target AI data centres as funding for climate alarmism dries up Globally, climate activists are intensifying scrutiny of and action against AI data centres due to their rapidly growing energy and water consumption, with projections indicating global electricity demand from data centres will more than double by 2030. According to Marc Marano, climate activists are attacking AI data cen…
😁17🤣7👍3
Dr. Ashley Bloomfield is New Zealand’s Anthony Fauci Dr. Anthony Fauci’s covid pandemic management parallels that of Dr. Ashley Bloomfield in New Zealand. Both officials cultivated cults of personality while suppressing information and deliberately misleading the public. This, quite rightly, has led the public in both countries mistrusting the health establishment... https://expose-news.com/2026/08/10/ashley-bloom…
👎8🖕8🔥5😈4❤1
Met Office claimed 2,700 people died because of “the heatwave”; it’s a lie In mid-July, the UK’s Meteorological Office (“Met Office”) claimed that over 2,700 people had died in England and Wales during May and June due to heatwaves. It’s not true. Paul Homewood explains why. The New York Times picked up on the story and publicised climate death statistics for France and Germany as well. If The New York Times is n…
🔥3❤2😈1
Without warning the British government starts moving illegal migrants into Thetford; locals protest and get arrested The British government’s unannounced placement of migrants in Thetford, England, sparked protests, resulting in a police response and arrests... https://expose-news.com/2026/08/08/without-warning-the-british-government-starts/
🤬21🙏3❤1
Smart glasses could be used to covertly collect and misuse personal data A legal expert is warning the Australian government to get ahead of the rapid rise of AI smart glasses before having to play catch-up on privacy laws... https://expose-news.com/2026/08/08/smart-glasses-could-be-used-to-covertly/
🤬7❤1🔥1
The Rape Gang Inquiry Report: Islamic collectivism and the Islamification of Britain One way to view the lack of British state officials to address the rape gang scandal is as an incorporation of dhimmi-like submissiveness to Islam. This mindset prioritises deference to Islam and Muslims above all else, while dismissing or assigning fault to non-believers. From this perspective, the failure of authorities to act d…
❤4🔥3🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @dailyexpose. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 135,906 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Exposé News (Official)” (@dailyexpose), 28,397 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dailyexpose.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.