A worldwide coalition of organizations and civil society groups that seek to broaden public health knowledge & sense-making through science & shared wisdom.
linktr.ee/worldcouncilforhealth
We safeguard health freedom.
Note: WCH will never DM you.
Created
13 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,256. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,785–35,417 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 01:08
33,973
-18
8 Nov 2026, 14:40
33,991
-13
7 Nov 2026, 06:41
34,004
-21
6 Nov 2026, 07:35
34,025
-10
5 Nov 2026, 06:30
34,035
-22
4 Nov 2026, 02:56
34,057
-11
3 Nov 2026, 02:59
34,068
-15
2 Nov 2026, 03:06
34,083
-11
1 Nov 2026, 03:18
34,094
-18
31 Oct 2026, 00:07
34,112
-19
30 Oct 2026, 03:40
34,131
-16
29 Oct 2026, 05:58
34,147
-25
28 Oct 2026, 01:29
34,172
-1
27 Oct 2026, 04:38
34,173
-13
26 Oct 2026, 02:11
34,186
-18
25 Oct 2026, 03:09
34,204
-9
24 Oct 2026, 05:27
34,213
-36
23 Oct 2026, 03:31
34,249
-1
22 Oct 2026, 02:56
34,250
-18
20 Oct 2026, 21:16
34,268
first reading
Engagement
119 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.59%
avg views ÷ 33,973 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,240
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 119 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
119 (2 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
87,340
Reactions total
965
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 18:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,290
Videos
≈870
Links
≈5,390
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
55m 12s
Average length
2m 12s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,940 reactions across 113 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
766
26.1%
🙏
519
17.7%
👍
439
14.9%
👏
355
12.1%
💯
335
11.4%
🔥
243
8.27%
🤯
77
2.62%
😡
74
2.52%
🎉
32
1.09%
😢
26
0.884%
👀
24
0.816%
😱
18
0.612%
🏆
11
0.374%
🤩
8
0.272%
🤔
5
0.17%
⚡
2
0.068%
😐
2
0.068%
💔
1
0.034%
😁
1
0.034%
🤣
1
0.034%
1 further kind
1
0.034%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,940 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Andrew Bridgen on Digital Money in Conversation with Dr Tess Lawrie 💶💷
'Minimise your interaction with the Government... use cash as often as possible... use cash as it's untraceable.'
'Cash is freedom... cash is king!' 💪🏼
At first we were told to use digital money, now they are telling us to have cash on hand for an emergency! 🤔
Will you be using cash today?
🎥Watch Dr Tess Lawrie's exclusive interview with And…
⭐️Sovereign Stories for a Better Way is a platform to highlight your creativity, dynamism and contributions, with the emphasis on parallel systems and solutions that are better for health, sovereignty, community and country.
We are looking for artists, crafters, musicians, writers, campaigners, educators, growers, farmers, health practitioners and other community initiatives that contribute to health and sovereignty…
🏥Restoring Trust in Healthcare Demands Accountability
❓Remember when heroin was marketed as a non-addictive alternative to morphine?
Read about the medical assurances from the past century and notice how many were delivered with total confidence, backed by the best institutions of the day, and later turned out to be catastrophes...
➡️You do not need to be a conspiracy theorist to find this list disturbing:
worldco…
⏰IT'S TIME... to join our newsletter readers if you haven't already!
Reasons to subscribe:
✅ Summary of WCH activity and wins
✅ Learn about new and existing health freedom good causes
✅ Positive news from all around the world, including updates from our Country Councils
✅ Never miss our great free content on our many platforms
✅ Be the first to know about upcoming exciting events
✅ Join an online community of t…
⚖️Six years on from the COVID-19 jab rollout, the courtroom is finally becoming the venue where vaccine injuries and COVID crimes are being heard...
🇩🇪Germany
🇳🇱The Netherlands
🇿🇦South Africa
🇺🇸USA (Florida), and
🇮🇳India are now in the legal limelight.
By the end of February 2021, Pfizer's own database already had 158,893 adverse events from just over 42,000 case reports with 1233 reported fatalities.
❓How can the…
☕️Announcing the Launch of Better Way Cafes! ☕️
We are excited to announce the launch of Better Way Cafes! Are you keen to connect with like-minded people in person?
Bring friends and make new ones during a relaxed and uplifting meeting of real conversation, fresh ideas and genuine human connection.
Featuring guest speakers, these gatherings are all about exploring practical ways we can build stronger, self-sustai…
❓Cancer - Anecdotal Evidence in Review: Mebendazole, Ivermectin, Fenbendazole - Do Repurposed Medicines Really Work? Find Out!
WCH One Day Intensive Workshop - Where YOU Ask the Doctors
Join us in London on Thursday 28 January 2027 for an intimate, intensive day exploring new approaches to cancer prevention and treatment, covering both conventional and natural approaches.
Hear from four leading voices:
⭐️ Prof. An…
📣AMISH ARE THE CONTROL GROUP!
🎥Watch Dr. Mark Trozzi and Christof Plothe DO as they discuss this and much more on our WCH YouTube channel here: https://youtu.be/7ugNcH2_bqs
🚨"It's an authoritarian's dream, isn't it!..."
Andrew Bridgen, former British MP
Andrew Bridgen reveals the shocking truth about rogue AI, digital ID, digital currency & tax automatically removed from bank accounts, pedophilia amongst the political elite, the real agenda behind lockdowns, and the bribes he was offered to stay silent.
🎥Watch Dr Tess Lawrie's exclusive interview with Andrew in full here: https://yout…
⚖️Six years on from the COVID-19 jab rollout, the courtroom is finally becoming the venue where vaccine injuries and COVID crimes are being heard...
🇩🇪Germany
🇳🇱The Netherlands
🇿🇦South Africa
🇺🇸USA (Florida), and
🇮🇳India are now in the legal limelight.
By the end of February 2021, Pfizer's own database already had 158,893 adverse events from just over 42,000 case reports with 1233 reported fatalities.
❓How can the…
❓Early Onset Cancers Ages Under 50 Up by 6.4% Since 2021. Why Are Cancer Rates Rising More Quickly Amongst Younger People? What Can We Do To Heal and Prevent Disease?
Join Us For A One Day Intensive Workshop — Where YOU Ask the Doctors
➡️ ENDING SOON! - Early bird tickets from £95 ⬅️
👉Join us for an intimate, intensive day exploring new approaches to cancer prevention and treatment, covering both conventional and …
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @wch_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@wch_org edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 September 2026
Most recent edit
26 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @wch_org as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
23 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Independent Medical Alliance @IMA_Health · 30,966 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
COVID-19 Up @COVID19Up · 25,474 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
Mikki Willis Official @OfficialPlandemic · 32,549 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
Children’s Health Defense @childrenshd · 52,391 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Dr. Bryan Ardis @BryanArdis · 36,472 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Dr. Simon @goddek · 38,308 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Steve Kirsch Channel @stkirsch · 18,815 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 October 2026
Medical Medium @MedicalMedium · 52,656 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Wide Awake Media - Official Channel @realwideawakemedia · 36,438 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel @DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,912 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
The TRUTH About Cancer | Vaccines @TheTruthAboutCancer_Vaccines · 28,288 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Dr. Mercola @DoctorMercola · 30,812 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
World Doctors Alliance @worlddoctorsalliance · 74,767 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon @DrMikeYeadon · 26,850 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
Child Covid Vaccine Injuries UK @childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk · 18,812 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 October 2026
Dr Naomi Wolf @NaomiWolfDr · 24,646 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
Covid Truth Network @covidtruthnet · 57,372 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Dr. Simone Gold @DrSimoneGold · 78,895 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Dr John B. @DrJohnB · 21,069 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 September 2026
Dr David Martin @DrDavidMartin · 49,760 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Christine Anderson, MdEP (AfD) @christineanderson · 34,931 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD · 103,075 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺 @ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 83,263 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Wide Awake Media @wideawakemedia · 26,588 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“World Council for Health” (@wch_org), 33,973 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wch_org.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.