Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr. Sam Bailey

Channel

Dr. Sam Bailey

@drsambaileyofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,464subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001551284937
TypeChannel
Username@drsambaileyofficial
DescriptionDr Sam is a medically trained doctor who makes health videos. Find me at drsambailey.com. Co-author of the best-selling book "Virus Mania". Monero (XMR): 4ADKsKsEx6c8Y8g1dSVd7vUR27JnbER5R2jUTkUuKFddSKVsmnxR9AFedzHhMH4P4vePK3SbVZgMzWik423Nno7fBuH3oo3
Created17 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drsambaileyofficial

Growth

16,46416,50216,4836 August 2026 — 16,502 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,502 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,500 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,499 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,502 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,496 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,482 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,479 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,476 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,469 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,464 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,458–16,508 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:3616,464-5
14 Aug 2026, 08:3816,469-7
13 Aug 2026, 00:5616,476-3
11 Aug 2026, 22:2216,479-3
10 Aug 2026, 22:2816,482-14
9 Aug 2026, 20:5116,496-6
8 Aug 2026, 23:3016,502+3
8 Aug 2026, 02:1416,499-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:1216,500-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:0316,502no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5416,502first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 2 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.9%
avg views ÷ 16,464 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,400
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held21 (2 December 202511 August 2026)
Views total14,800
Reactions total383
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
183
Videos
16
Links
252

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,901 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,29446.8%
👍1,12422.9%
💯4779.73%
🔥2004.08%
👏1933.94%
😢1603.26%
😁1462.98%
🙏721.47%
🤯641.31%
❤‍🔥591.20%
330.673%
😱320.653%
🤔310.633%
🥰100.204%
🎉30.061%
🕊30.061%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,901reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC≈4,910 views158 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

What if the state was never meant to be the foundation of society — but became its ultimate authority? Discover how sovereignty gave the state the power to absorb almost every institution standing in its way. 👉 Watch the full video NOW

77👍46💯15🙏12❤‍🔥4🤔4

Signed Sam Bailey

28 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC≈9,890 views225 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

The Biggest LIES About Cholesterol In this new video, Dr Sam Bailey examines the cholesterol narrative, statins, and the evidence behind one of medicine's most enduring beliefs. 🎥 Watch now HERE

146👍51👏21❤‍🔥6🤔1

Signed Sam Bailey

14 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC≈13,600 views218 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🧐 What if five common medical words don't mean what you've been led to believe? In this latest video, I explore the history and changing meanings of five familiar terms—and why understanding language is key to questioning modern medical narratives. ▶️ Watch now

136👍64🔥114🤔2🤯1

Signed Sam Bailey

30 Jun 2026, 08:08 UTC≈17,500 views269 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨 NEW VIDEO: The Biggest Lies About Blood Pressure High blood pressure has been called the "silent killer" for decades—but where did this narrative come from? Dr. Sam Bailey examines the evidence behind hypertension guidelines, the expanding definition of "high" blood pressure, and whether the promised benefits of lifelong medication match the published data. 👉 Watch now and decide for yourself.

152👍66💯30🙏135👏2😱1

Signed Sam Bailey

16 Jun 2026, 07:51 UTC≈17,800 views240 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🐄 The Dark Side of Foot-and-Mouth Disease We're told foot-and-mouth disease is a highly contagious viral threat requiring mass vaccination and the destruction of livestock. But when we examine the original 1898 experiments and the modern methods used to diagnose the disease, a very different picture emerges. 👉 Watch the full video here

💯11358👍48👏16🔥3🕊1🤔1

Signed Sam Bailey

2 Jun 2026, 08:02 UTC≈22,800 views278 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Ebola is back in the headlines. We're told it's highly infectious, extremely deadly, and a constant global threat. So why has it never spread around the world as predicted? My latest video investigates the origins of the Ebola story, the testing claims behind it, and the latest fear campaign. 👉 Watch here

152💯53👍36🙏14🔥8😁8👏42

Signed Sam Bailey

18 May 2026, 08:23 UTC≈18,200 views311 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Exciting and new. Come Aboard. We're expecting you! Another cruise ship “virus scare” is making headlines… but does the story actually make sense? In our latest video we break down the MV Hondius hantavirus claims, the media hype, and the bigger picture behind the fear campaign. 👉 Watch full video here

😁132👍6756👏27💯17❤‍🔥8🔥31

Signed Sam Bailey

5 May 2026, 07:53 UTC≈15,300 views214 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

The Truth About Antivirals 💊 If so-called “antivirals” exist… does that automatically prove viruses do? In this new video, we examine the claims behind antiviral drugs, the assumptions built into the virus model, and why many people may be accepting a narrative they’ve never fully questioned. 🔍 👉 Watch now and decide for yourself.

120👍59🔥21💯10🥰31

Signed Sam Bailey

21 Apr 2026, 08:13 UTC≈25,100 views318 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

A High Court was asked to provide proof of viruses and germ theory… and the response was not what you’d expect. Watch the full breakdown 👇 HERE

👍15582💯30🔥19❤‍🔥12👏8🙏53

Signed Sam Bailey

7 Apr 2026, 22:50 UTC≈19,600 views206 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

10 Ways YOU Are Being Tricked by the CDC For over a century, public health institutions have claimed credit for some of the greatest improvements in human health. But how much of that story actually holds up when you examine the evidence? In this clip, we look at the CDC’s list of the “Ten Great Public Health Achievements” of the 20th century — and the narrative behind it. 👉 Watch the full video HERE to see the ev

116👍45💯23🔥11👏6❤‍🔥31🤔1

Signed Sam Bailey

24 Mar 2026, 06:53 UTC≈18,700 views249 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Doctor: Why I Changed My Mind About Screening Tests I used to believe screening tests saved lives—until my own experience showed me how misleading and harmful they can be ⚠️ If you think testing equals better health, this video might completely change your mind 👀 👉 Watch my new video HERE

126💯60👍36🙏13👏7🔥6🤔1

Signed Sam Bailey

10 Mar 2026, 07:17 UTC≈19,300 views185 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Rubella Vaccines: What You NEED To Know Rubella was once called the ‘mildest of all childhood diseases’… so why did doctors suddenly claim it could destroy unborn babies? Watch the video that exposes the truth behind the rubella scare and the MMR vaccine. 👉 Watch it HERE

👍10053🔥14🙏12🤔5💯1

Signed Sam Bailey

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @drsambaileyofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 88,276 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr. Sam Bailey” (@drsambaileyofficial), 16,464 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drsambaileyofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.