Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NurseDJSpeaks

Channel

NurseDJSpeaks

@NurseDJSpeaks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

495subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001662852438
TypeChannel
Username@NurseDJSpeaks
Created11 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NurseDJSpeaks

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4955055007 August 2026 — 505 subscribers7 August 2026 — 505 subscribers14 August 2026 — 502 subscribers21 August 2026 — 500 subscribers13 September 2026 — 497 subscribers24 September 2026 — 495 subscribers7 August 202624 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 49 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 494–507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 21:59495-2
13 Sept 2026, 17:39497-3
21 Aug 2026, 13:46500-2
14 Aug 2026, 19:34502-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:43505no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:17505first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3551.5%
😢1623.5%
🤬811.8%
👍710.3%
👏11.47%
😱11.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2024 to 17 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 May 2026, 10:13 UTC113 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @australiaforfreedomVideo

🇦🇺🎪🤯👀🤦🏻‍♂️ Australia has been labelled the “laughing stock of the world” by a women’s rights advocate after the Federal Court dismissed the appeal of the Giggle v Tickle ruling. The court found that the transgender male was unlawfully discriminated against after denied access in an all women only platform. https://t.me/australiaforfreedom

15 Mar 2026, 21:56 UTC189 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @worlddoctorsalliance

https://brownstone.org/articles/what-covid-policy-did-to-doctors-who-refused-to-stay-silent/

27 Dec 2025, 20:02 UTC308 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @StormIsUponUsJMVideo

"In 2025... 77% more babies are dying than normal." According to epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, infant mortality had been decreasing for three decades. However, that all changed in 2021, following widespread mRNA vaccination among women of childbearing age. Subscribe and share 👉 @StormIsUponUsJM

😢6

28 Nov 2025, 00:38 UTC357 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Interesting that Australia has banned tobacco farming. Could it be that tobacco has benefits? 🤔 https://youtu.be/5Ljkffwq8gw?si=cBq8m6coOkK1VjtN

❤3

25 Nov 2025, 21:40 UTC240 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRQeRfHDL-l/?igsh=dXo5bnYwN2dqeGwy

21 Nov 2025, 06:23 UTC203 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1B1nMnp68b/?mibextid=wwXIfr

😢1

21 Nov 2025, 05:51 UTC182 viewsread 7 August 2026

🚨Autism And Vaccines The claim "vaccines do not cause autism" is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism… Read more here 👇 https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/autism.html

15 Oct 2025, 20:40 UTC247 viewsread 7 August 2026

New Law Raises Concerns Over Online Safety 📢 The new Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 bans anyone under 16 from using social media, and forces everyone over 16 to prove their age through ID, facial scans, or behavioural tracking. The government's own trials showed these systems don't work. Every method failed on privacy, accuracy, and accessibility. Yet the law passed anyway — after just …

15 Oct 2025, 19:49 UTC290 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The long-awaited film showcasing the buried study of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children has been released, free to view/download. https://rumble.com/v708dfw-an-inconvenient-study-feature-film.html We're covering this story tonight, but preparing for the show today and just viewing some of the data has absolutely ignited a fire in me. ALL vaccines at this point should be banned, especially for children. Look at s…

👏1

6 Jul 2025, 09:26 UTC437 viewsread 7 August 2026

FDA Announces New Safety Warning on All mRNA COVID Vaccines — Cites “Extremely High” Risk of Myocarditis and Long-Term Heart Damage in Young Men | The Truthseeker https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=311506

1 Jul 2025, 06:31 UTC398 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Eddiex (@eddiexfreepalestine)’s videos with origineel geluid - Eddiex | TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@eddiexfreepalestine/video/7521085815192161568

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @NurseDJSpeaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NurseDJSpeaks” (@NurseDJSpeaks), 495 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NurseDJSpeaks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.