Channel
@RWMaloneMD
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
107,511subscribers
-410 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001111693396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RWMaloneMD |
| Created | 12 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RWMaloneMD |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 107,511 | -34 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 107,545 | -58 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 107,603 | -96 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 107,699 | -70 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 107,769 | -31 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 107,800 | -87 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:40 | 107,887 | -34 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 107,921 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (30 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 190,738 |
| Reactions total | 6,120 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,473 reactions across 36 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,360 | 24.8% | |
| 💯 | 1,192 | 21.8% | |
| ❤ | 714 | 13.0% | |
| 🔥 | 511 | 9.34% | |
| 🤣 | 502 | 9.17% | |
| 🙏 | 376 | 6.87% | |
| 🤬 | 323 | 5.90% | |
| 👏 | 114 | 2.08% | |
| 😢 | 94 | 1.72% | |
| 🤡 | 86 | 1.57% | |
| 🤮 | 58 | 1.06% | |
| 👎 | 35 | 0.64% | |
| 🤔 | 33 | 0.603% | |
| 🥰 | 17 | 0.311% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 0.238% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 0.201% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 0.201% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.11% | |
| 🥱 | 6 | 0.11% | |
| 🥴 | 6 | 0.11% | |
| 1 further kind | 5 | 0.091% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
President Trump, alongside Robert F. Kennedy Jr, this week announced new childhood vaccine recommendations, expanding parental choice, as well as direction for the Attorney General to challenge states that do not provide vaccine exemptions. @RWMaloneMD ➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
👍35❤3🙏3
☄️Anthony Fauci's successor, NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, BLASTS Fauci for COVERING UP the alleged 82% MISCARRIAGE RATE for pregnant women taking the COVID vaccine "Tony Fauci was OUT OF HIS LANE, and used that power to tell America one thing when he really thought another." "I'm glad his words now can be heard by the American people... it's SHOCKING to me that he was sharing private thoughts and that, when he wa…
💯36🔥2❤1🙏1
NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya on the new childhood vaccine schedule: "It's more in line with what European nations do. Less emphasis on force, more emphasis on shared decision-making. More emphasis on parental autonomy. "We're now partners with parents rather than overlords of parents telling them what they must do." Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
👍27👏7🤔4🙏2
NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya says President Trump’s vaccine executive order finally gives parents a real voice in decisions about their children. And ensuring a child can’t lose access to an education because of a vaccine decision can only benefit children and society. “What this does is it restores the autonomy of families and parents to make good decisions for their kids.” “We shouldn’t be keeping kids out …
👍133🔥22🙏16❤7🤬3👏1🤔1
👆👆👆 True story - we were and often still vilified by mainstream media. Still banned permanently from LinkedIn My wiki page is still full of lies Anyone who thinks it’s over, hasn’t been paying attention 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
💯104😢15🙏8
Remember what they said about @RWMaloneMD, @DrSteveKirsch and me when we tried to warn you in June of '21? Now that you know Dr. Fauci lied to us, as he covered up a massive miscarriage signal, you should rethink everything else. The man is very comfortable killing innocent people. Join @DrBretWeinstein
👍87💯41🤬7🙏6❤3🔥1
We asked what Alexis de Tocqueville would have written if he had landed at Ben Gurion instead of Newport. Then we wrote it. His method is the reason: he spent most of a book admiring American democracy, then wrote the chapter that saw the Civil War coming. --- He held that the decisive facts about a people are not its laws but its habits. Americans began with a Puritan holding a covenant and no lord above him. …
👍25❤18🤮6🔥2🙏2
Robert Malone: How MAHA Was Corrupted From the Inside 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
😢42🤔9🤬8❤3👎2🤨1
-Israel's Closing Frontier- The West Bank runs on a property law written in 1858 by the Ottoman Empire. It is still the operative code. It decides who holds what, and it is about to decide it permanently. Almost nobody outside the region knows this. It explains more than any headline.🧵 --- A disclosure first, because it belongs at the top and not in a footnote. Jill and I were there for a week in July. The deleg…
👍36❤29🙏11🤮4🤡3
I just found these when we were moving some furniture. Signed and Dated Feb 02, 1989. After filing these with the Vical law firm, I spent two days at the offices of Ned Israelson describing how this invention could be used, including for vaccines. For the record, these disclosures did not involve Dr Phillip Felgner. 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
👍61🔥12❤9🙏2
Sunday Strip: "There’s an App for That" Whether you want it or not... Click on the link for more memes, cartoons, video and humor. https://www.malone.news/p/sunday-strip-theres-an-app-for-that 📌Follow and Share👇🏻 🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
👍34🤣17❤7🙏4
Christians are being spat on in Jerusalem. That is true. The people doing it are overwhelmingly drawn from small, identifiable religious communities. That is also true. And much of what Americans are now being told about WHY it is happening is false. A thread. 🧵 --- Earlier this month, Israeli teenagers knocked on the door of the Armenian Apostolic Church headquarters in Jerusalem. They asked if Christians were ins…
👍72❤43🙏16🤔8🤮8🤡4🔥3👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @RWMaloneMD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 3,257 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 51 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Robert W Malone, MD” (@RWMaloneMD), 107,511 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RWMaloneMD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.