Channel
@togetherdeclaration
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,381subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001591962546 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @togetherdeclaration |
| Created | 7 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/togetherdeclaration |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 4,381 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 4,386 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:06 | 4,383 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 4,385 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 4,388 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 4,389 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 4,390 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 4,402 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 4,404 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 4,403 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 4,403 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
MEMBERSHIP: We’ve won a battle, but the war isn’t over We campaigned hard for over a year against the official digital ID scheme But with related issues like One Login to ID checks for the internet, we need you🫵 Join us from just £3 per month: http://togetherdeclaration.org/join We're stronger #together
“How Michael Bloomberg taught Britain’s Andy Burnham to act like a big shot” Billionaire Bloomberg didn’t only "teach Burnham how to be a big shot" - he also chaired and bankrolled C40 Cities, whose climate programmes Greater Manchester participated in under Burnham https://www.politico.eu/article/andy-burnham-michael-bloomberg-influence-prime-minister-bid/ #NetZero
"Time and time again, there have been people who have risen up against tyranny and said, 'No more'" Nathan Anderson at our 25 April Scrap Digital ID event in Belfast Since then, Andy Burnham has indeed announced the official Digital ID scheme would be scrapped Now we must ensure connected systems such as GOV UK One Login, the GOV UK App and Government Wallet cannot become Digital ID in all but name through expansi…
DIGITAL ID: "It's only 'voluntary' if you want to participate in economic life" - Nathan Anderson at our 25 April Scrap Digital ID event in Belfast Since then, Andy Burnham has indeed announced the official Digital ID scheme would be scrapped Now we must ensure connected systems such as GOV UK One Login, the GOV UK App and Government Wallet cannot become Digital ID in all but name through expansion, function creep …
NET ZERO: "London's 20mph speed limits crippling black cabs, hindering disabled travellers and enforcing Sadiq Khan's 'war on motorists'" https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16026967/London-20mph-speed-limits-Lynda-La-Plante.html
Important: Our X accounts appear to have been attacked - please help Hi, we need your help, please. Two X (Twitter) accounts connected with Together appear to have been compromised in what may have been a targeted attack. We appear to have regained control of our main account, but right now co-founder Alan Miller is completely locked out of his account. IMPORTANT: In the event you have recently received an unexpe…
ONE LOGIN: "This will be worse than Horizon scandal" - David Davis "The entire population's data will be open to malevolent actors, foreign nations, ransomware criminals, hackers, their enemies... (One Login is) scandalously insecure" One Login is steadily bringing more personal information into one place and has expanded across 200+ government services already - while grave security concerns persist
NET ZERO: "Net Zero has completely and utterly failed... (UK policies) do nothing on the global scale." We have a new energy secretary in Miatta Fahnbulleh but no end to the craziness You aren't a leader if no-one follows you! #NetZero
DIGITAL ID: "I wouldn't trust them with the keys to my flat, let alone my biometrics and personal data" Together welcomes new PM Burnham’s decision to scrap the national digital ID scheme - but we must not allow digital ID “by stealth” Any expansion of the Government’s digital wallet, GOV UK app, and One Login - a centralised access system requiring citizens to hand over private data - must be strictly curtailed, o…
NET ZERO: New Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh "even more extreme and zealous than Miliband" - Robert Jenrick Net Zero is a policy that is wrecking our country #NetZero
Andy Burnham announced scrapping of official Digital ID scheme after millions rejected “Digital Papers Please” At the same time, related platform One Login has quietly expanded across 200+ government services - with more planned Our task now is to ensure systems such as One Login, the GOV UK App and Government Wallet cannot become Digital ID in all but name through expansion, function creep or the erosion of offlin…
Local Together supporters distributed hundreds of thousands of leaflets as part of our Digital ID campaigning - like here in Cardiff We can influence things when we take action #together
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @togetherdeclaration. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@togetherdeclaration named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Together Declaration” (@togetherdeclaration), 4,381 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/togetherdeclaration.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.