Official information channel of Fall Cabal / Cyntha Koeter & Janet Ossebaard ( † 2023)
For our documentaries, products and donations: www.fallcabal.com
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/ws4fMTn6yNc7/
Created
8 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,098. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 82,058–83,486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:21
82,223
-43
16 Sept 2026, 07:18
82,266
-37
14 Sept 2026, 13:21
82,303
-41
13 Sept 2026, 02:58
82,344
-51
11 Sept 2026, 01:00
82,395
-62
8 Sept 2026, 04:39
82,457
-91
5 Sept 2026, 02:02
82,548
-39
3 Sept 2026, 07:48
82,587
-22
2 Sept 2026, 03:12
82,609
-24
1 Sept 2026, 06:04
82,633
-32
31 Aug 2026, 08:13
82,665
-20
30 Aug 2026, 08:43
82,685
-23
29 Aug 2026, 09:34
82,708
-22
28 Aug 2026, 07:54
82,730
-35
27 Aug 2026, 10:11
82,765
-15
26 Aug 2026, 11:34
82,780
-28
25 Aug 2026, 14:23
82,808
-18
24 Aug 2026, 12:35
82,826
-29
22 Aug 2026, 22:08
82,855
-22
21 Aug 2026, 10:38
82,877
first reading
Engagement
436 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.67%
avg views ÷ 82,223 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,480
257 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
257
of 436 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
436 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,409,230
Reactions total
44,939
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 00:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,020
Videos
≈6,760
Links
≈7,470
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 55m
Average length
2m 21s
Measured directly from 176 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
76,257 reactions across 422 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😡
14,922
19.6%
❤
11,450
15.0%
👍
11,218
14.7%
🔥
8,855
11.6%
👏
8,360
11.0%
🙏
8,161
10.7%
🤔
3,225
4.23%
😁
2,707
3.55%
👎
2,020
2.65%
😢
2,005
2.63%
😱
1,100
1.44%
🤯
1,091
1.43%
❤🔥
477
0.626%
🤨
422
0.553%
🤩
122
0.16%
🥰
109
0.143%
😘
13
0.017%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 436 of the 436 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78,561 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 436 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Argentina President Javier Milei just walked up to the mic at the United Nations and RIPPED THEM TO THEIR FACES
"It's become a USELESS organization whose only purpose is to sustain a caste of fatefully arrogant PARASITES masquerading as well-intentioned bureaucrats!"
"The alleged 'defenders of human rights' have sheltered bloodthirsty dictatorships and regimes that stone women in the streets!"
"Good people do not …
Trump posted a post from Juan O Savin 107. For people following the Q posts and discussions, this is a big thing.
This is definitely a huge wink to Q and the entire movement.
Interesting!
Michael Jackson, a fighter for a new world...
One who didn't comply, who became big by his own talent.
One who fought for peace and freedom.
One who truly loved humanity...
Remember when Lady Boy Gaga flashed his little winkle in front of thousands at Glastonbury in 2009. And the time he admitted he was a ‘he’ in an interview with Anderson Cooper.
They like to shove it our face….literally!
https://x.com/real_shirelass/status/2098858560431993188?s=46
Neuroscientist exposes the truth about learning with devices.
Can you see the agenda?
Since 2010 our children can use technology in school. They learn to 'outsource' their thinking.
Then AI comes, completely taking over thinking for this generation. They are caught and will not have the thinking power to ever escape this system.
Christopher Lee tells you very simply. Satanism has been here for thousands of years.
It's simply the dark force that will give people materialistic power without them having to work for it. It's a short cut, but it will cost them dearly.
A leap of faith in telling you my story.
To be honest, I feel many doubts in doing so. I always feel that my message is far more important than me. I don’t give interviews, do podcasts or any of these things. If people reach out and invite me to talk about the Fall of the Cabal, I always ask them to show the series instead. All I have to say is in there. What can I add other than some ego?
The Sequel and the Conclu…
We are watching a movie.
Following all these different plots being played out... The script is excellent!
The MSM has lost all credibility and the public is watching it's absolute fall.
All Trump has to do is pointing it out.
The Fall of the Cabal in Action!
❤122🔥54👍30👎9🙏3🤔2😁1
Signed Cyntha Koeter
Showing the 12 most recent of 436 posts we hold for @Fall_of_the_Cabal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 78 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
World Doctors Alliance @worlddoctorsalliance · 76,123 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺 @ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 84,719 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Mikki Willis Official @OfficialPlandemic · 33,413 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
LauraAboli @LauraAbolichannel · 168,591 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
Wide Awake Media @wideawakemedia · 27,142 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
Just a Dude 😎 @JustDudeChannel · 63,423 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
AustraliaOneParty_Official @australiaoneparty_official · 32,920 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
Christiane Northrup M.D @drchristianenorthrup · 41,810 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Disclosure HUB @disclosurehub · 74,772 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
David Icke Official Telegram @davidickeofficial · 42,746 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
3D to 5D Consciousness @News_3Dto5D · 39,519 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
American Thinker @americanthinker1 · 36,693 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Medical Medium @MedicalMedium · 54,023 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Majestic 12 Hub @Majestic12Mirror · 22,625 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 September 2026
Dr. Tenpenny @DrTenpenny · 89,219 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
Hidden In Plain Sight @hiddeninplainsight1 · 38,509 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 31 August 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel @DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 26,014 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
And We Know® @andweknowLT · 86,337 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
Dr. Simon @goddek · 39,204 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Zeee Media 🎙 @zeeemedia · 54,514 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
The Crowhouse @thecrowhouseoffical · 29,566 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
Barbara O'neill @BarbaraOneillOfficial · 66,124 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
HATS 🎩 @HATSTRUTH · 87,849 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 16 September 2026
Lee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1 @FreedomDoc1 · 24,506 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FallCabal Official Channel” (@Fall_of_the_Cabal), 82,223 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fall_of_the_Cabal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.