Channel
@AseemMalhotra
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,940subscribers
-125 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001442471043 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AseemMalhotra |
| Created | 15 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AseemMalhotra |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 7,940 | -20 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 7,960 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 7,971 | -8 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 7,979 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:04 | 7,996 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 8,004 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 8,014 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 8,021 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 8,032 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 8,038 | -18 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 8,056 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 8,063 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 8,067 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 8,065 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 8,065 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 37 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,065 reactions across 37 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 445 | 21.5% | |
| 🔥 | 424 | 20.5% | |
| ❤ | 409 | 19.8% | |
| 🤬 | 366 | 17.7% | |
| 👏 | 193 | 9.35% | |
| 🙏 | 83 | 4.02% | |
| 🤔 | 61 | 2.95% | |
| 😱 | 45 | 2.18% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 1.07% | |
| 😢 | 17 | 0.823% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
NEW - Fmr. FDA CBER Director Dr. Vinay Prasad: “Is it the case that kids died of myocarditis from the COVID-19 vaccine? Yes, absolutely it is the case … It was a really bad idea to vaccinate healthy kids for COVID and force them to do it.”
🔥17🤬11😢4👍1
You really couldn’t make this up.
🔥8❤2
Lancaster County Commissioner Josh Parsons: “I spoke at length this morning with the coroner himself, and they have zero cases of measles deaths … They had one patient who died with measles, not of measles.”
🔥15❤4
RFK Jr. and President Trump are taking on the American Medical Association’s monopoly over the billing codes used throughout America’s healthcare system. “CPT codes are owned exclusively by the American Medical Association, the AMA.” “Decades ago, Congress gave the AMA a de facto monopoly over these codes.” “Last year alone, organizations across all of our healthcare systems paid the AMA more than three hundred mi…
❤17👍5🔥1
You fixed your biggest insecurity in just 90 days. 😳 He didn't believe it would work... Now everyone keeps asking what changed. 🧢 Just 20 minutes a day 🔴 Advanced Red Light Therapy 📈 90-day transformation that speaks for itself. 🎥 Watch until the end... the before & after is unbelievable. 👇 Get yours before today's discount ends. https://tinyurl.com/RedLightTherapyCap ☑️ https://tinyurl.com/blu-zyme ☑️
❤2
‘The discovery that the guy that set this in motion has a racial axe to grind as revenge for his failure to get a position, it’s a little bit damning and makes the entire story read differently to me’ The most balanced analysis so far from my friend @BretWeinstein on Arday saga
👍11❤2
“Greatness does not come out of intelligence, it comes from character. Character is not formed out of smart people: it is formed out of people who have suffered.” — Nvidia CEO, Jensen Huang
👍24❤11👏11
RFK Jr. says even if vaccine injuries are rare, the people who experience them deserve to be heard, not ignored. “There are kids across the country who are experiencing these things, and it may be rare, but we should still be paying attention to them.” “Injuries and death from measles are extremely rare… but we still pay attention to them.” “There are people all over the country who are injured, who are trying to …
❤39👏23👍13🙏7🔥1
Wow! This video perfectly epitomises mass formation : ‘a group hypnosis where there is loss of ethical self awareness and an ability to think critically’ THIS is why trust in Drs is at an all time low & will not be restored until there is a huge apology
👍32🔥11🤬5😢2
‘NHS staff survey reveals racism deeply entrenched and disturbingly normalised’ https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/press-releases/NHS-staff-survey-racism-disturbingly-normalised
🤔17❤4😢2
NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya SHUTS DOWN a mainstream media reporter trying to blame the collapse in public health trust on President Trump and RFK Jr. “The reason why you have this problem of public trust is because what happened in 2020 has not yet been addressed.”
👍64❤19👏15🙏1
Fmr. CDC Director says “it was a mistake to vaccinate pregnant women” for COVID-19
🔥34🤬25👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @AseemMalhotra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Aseem Malhotra” (@AseemMalhotra), 7,940 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AseemMalhotra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.