Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Orwellian Dystopia

Channel

Orwellian Dystopia

@OrwellianDystopia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,303subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001389661054
TypeChannel
Username@OrwellianDystopia
DescriptionMemes Channel: @PsyopsMemes DISCLAIMER: This channel is for entertainment only. All content published on this channel do not reflect the views or beliefs of the channel admins. The channel admins are not liable for published content.
Created29 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OrwellianDystopia

Growth

14,28514,30314,2946 August 2026 — 14,294 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,296 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,288 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,285 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,287 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,285 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,289 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,293 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,295 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,299 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,296 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,303 subscribers6 August 202619 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 13 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,282–14,306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 18:3314,303+7
18 Aug 2026, 16:0414,296-3
17 Aug 2026, 19:3514,299+4
16 Aug 2026, 16:4314,295+2
15 Aug 2026, 00:2814,293+4
13 Aug 2026, 14:1714,289+4
12 Aug 2026, 12:0414,285-2
11 Aug 2026, 08:3314,287+2
10 Aug 2026, 05:5114,285-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:4114,288-8
7 Aug 2026, 00:3014,296+2
6 Aug 2026, 10:4714,294first reading

Engagement

90 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 14,303 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
90 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
90
of 90 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held90 (25 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total141,945
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
40,200
Videos
32,600
Links
34,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 14m
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC134 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Yemen’s Houthis say they have established three key deterrence equations: Blockade for blockade: preventing Saudi maritime traffic from passing. Targeting Saudi military buildups: striking forces and equipment wherever they are deployed. Defending Yemeni sovereignty: confronting any violation of Yemen’s territory or airspace. From July 20 to August 19, Yemen’s Houthis say they targeted eight Saudi oil vessels—fiv

20 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC205 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Kim Yo-jong, the younger sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and a senior North Korean official, says she is not aware of any recent communication between Kim Jong-un and U.S. President Donald Trump.

20 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC252 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Trump on Kim Jong Un: The fact that I get along well with Kim Jong Un is a good thing. He has 57 very powerful nuclear weapons. Should have never allowed it to happen, but he’s got them. I get along with him very well. I know Kim Jong Un very well. He is gonna be fine. As long as we have a smart president, he is gonna be fine. If we have a dumb president, then he is probably not gonna be so fine.

20 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC238 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Reporter: Will you reopen negotiations with Iran? Trump: Maybe at some point, but right now the situation is so good. But maybe at some point.

20 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC230 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Trump: We have possession, complete control of the Strait of Hormuz.

20 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC220 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Trump: I was in China. They have the great room. They have a room that’s phenomenal.

20 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC204 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Trump on Iran: It’s not gonna be perfect, but it’s a lot of oil coming out, a lot. People are amazed.

20 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC201 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Reporter: What if the Supreme Court rules against your ballroom project? Trump: We hope that doesn't happen. I can't imagine it happening.

20 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC183 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Trump: Scotts Miracle-Gro is a great company. They actually contributed to my campaign, I must be honest. You’ll figure that one out. Somebody said the biggest grass company in the world.

20 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC174 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Trump: We put brand new earth on top. Lot of good ingredients for the grass. If you are grass, you are very happy.

20 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC178 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Trump on Iran: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. You know why? Cause they would use it. We are not gonna let them use it.

20 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC176 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Trump: People are finding alternatives to Hormuz. You know the alternatives: Texas, Alaska, Louisiana. People are coming to the U.S. for oil.

Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @OrwellianDystopia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 36,736 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

World Doctors Alliance
@worlddoctorsalliance · 77,305
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox · 121,691
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
@robinmg · 68,852
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
David Avocado Wolfe
@davidavocadowolfe · 104,493
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
Follow The White Rabbit ™ 🐇
@followsthewhiterabbit · 80,631
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
The Awakened Species ☀️
@awakenedspecies · 143,072
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
LauraAboli
@LauraAbolichannel · 170,315
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Orwellian Dystopia” (@OrwellianDystopia), 14,303 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OrwellianDystopia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.