Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr. Bryan Ardis

Channel

Dr. Bryan Ardis

@BryanArdis

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,472subscribers

-269 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001506262602
TypeChannel
Username@BryanArdis
Created1 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BryanArdis

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@BryanArdis/1826 · this entry16 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC@DrMikeYeadon/632116 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@BryanArdis/1834 · this entry22 Sept 2026, 19:40 UTC@DrMikeYeadon/633622 Sept 2026, 19:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@BryanArdis/1842 · this entry28 Sept 2026, 20:59 UTC@DrMikeYeadon/636428 Sept 2026, 20:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@BryanArdis/1846 · this entry1 Oct 2026, 19:50 UTC@DrMikeYeadon/63731 Oct 2026, 19:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@DrMikeYeadon/63916 Oct 2026, 19:01 UTC@BryanArdis/1852 · this entry6 Oct 2026, 19:19 UTC1.0018 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@DrMikeYeadon5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@DrMikeYeadon (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 87 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

36,47236,74636,6096 August 202611 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 97 days, net -269. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,431–36,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 13:1836,472-8
9 Nov 2026, 19:5836,480-7
8 Nov 2026, 12:1636,487-10
7 Nov 2026, 07:0236,497-19
6 Nov 2026, 05:3736,516-9
5 Nov 2026, 02:4036,525-3
4 Nov 2026, 02:4036,528-11
3 Nov 2026, 01:4636,539-10
1 Nov 2026, 01:2836,549-2
30 Oct 2026, 23:1036,551-5
29 Oct 2026, 20:4936,556-12
27 Oct 2026, 18:0036,568-10
26 Oct 2026, 17:3736,578-3
25 Oct 2026, 17:5636,581-4
24 Oct 2026, 15:5536,585-6
23 Oct 2026, 13:3636,591+2
22 Oct 2026, 11:4436,589-6
21 Oct 2026, 08:0936,595+7
20 Oct 2026, 03:5836,588-6
19 Oct 2026, 06:4536,594first reading

Engagement

133 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 36,472 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,140
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 133 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held133 (20 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total235,720
Reactions total3,621
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈48
Videos
≈1,470
Links
≈313

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
25h 28m
Average length
13m 17s

Measured directly from 115 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

15,274 reactions across 133 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯4,58530.0%
👍3,59123.5%
❤3,06120.0%
🔥1,3008.51%
🙏1,0256.71%
🤬4392.87%
😡4142.71%
👏1811.19%
⚡1420.93%
😱1040.681%
🤔960.629%
🤯920.602%
🤡570.373%
😢550.36%
👎400.262%
👀200.131%
😭160.105%
🥴140.092%
🤪120.079%
🤮120.079%
5 further kinds180.118%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 133 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,274 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
52
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 133 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BryanArdis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 133 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈1,120 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Special Episode - Parasites and Cancer with Dr Omar Amin and Karim Amin Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

👍7💯3❤1

10 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈3,220 views73 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Isolated pharmacy products strip away the essential supporting nutrients nature integrated into whole plant leaves. Traditional botanical preparations preserve this natural synergy, supporting cellular receptors far more effectively than lab-altered alternatives. Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

👍50🙏11❤10💯1🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈4,000 views43 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Gold, Silver and the Economy: October 2026 Update with Dr. Kirk Elliott Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

👍30👏5🔥5🙏2👌1

8 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈4,680 views146 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

The contradiction between what public health agencies ban and what they protect tells you everything you need to know about corporate healthcare priorities. Chronic illness drives the most lucrative pharmaceutical revenue streams, making unpatentable natural solutions a direct threat to corporate monopolies. Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

💯76❤31👍24🙏12🔥2😱1

7 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈5,840 views138 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Calcium forces your muscle fibers to contract, while magnesium is the essential mineral required to pull calcium out of your tissues and put it back into your bones. Modern diets often lead to severe calcium overload and magnesium depletion, leaving your nervous system tight and hyper-reactive. Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

💯60❤32👍20🔥18🙏8

6 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈5,510 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Breast Implant Nightmares and Health Tips Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

👍18❤7😱4🙏2

5 Nov 2026, 19:04 UTC≈5,430 views47 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

My stress used to feel like a full-body alarm I couldn’t switch off. 😳 Then I added ONE simple thing to my daily routine… 🔴 20 minutes a day on this Red Light Therapy Mat — paired with breathwork, stretching, and a few quiet minutes to reset. No complicated routine. No leaving the house. Just lie down, switch it on, and RELAX. ✨ Red Light Therapy has become one of my favorite parts of my daily wellness routine — es…

❤32🤡6👍4👎3🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈5,810 views122 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

What if everything you were taught about your health deserves to be questioned? Who benefits when you stop asking questions? Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

💯87❤17🔥13👍2🙏2🤡1

4 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈7,020 views153 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Shortly after Dr. Ardis publicly revealed nicotine as a potential antidote in 2020, five countries, including the U.S. and the U.K., rushed to announce their plan to eradicate tobacco access by 2030. Coincidence? Or damage control? Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

💯96🙏30❤18🤬7⚡1🤡1

3 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈6,480 views134 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Video

Human instinct hardwires us to run away from venomous creatures, yet institutional science is increasingly attempting to normalize venom peptides in healthcare. Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

👏41💯30👍26🙏19❤10🤮4🔥3🤡1

2 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈6,850 views109 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Video

What if the health system you trusted isn’t telling you the full story? For decades, Big Pharma, government agencies, and mainstream medicine have shaped the way we view health. But what happens when we start questioning the narratives we’ve been given? Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

💯74👍16🔥9❤4🙏4🤡1🤬1

1 Nov 2026, 12:50 UTC≈6,600 views68 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

A.G.E.S. MC 25 - What Is Draining Your Energy? | Parasites of the Body, Mind, & Spirit - Oct 2026 Join ➡️ @BryanArdis

👍31🙏21💯7❤5⚡3😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @BryanArdis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @BryanArdis as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Dr. Lee Merritt
@LeeMerritt · 15,844
#1
Dr. Paul Marik
@DrPaulMarik · 9,699
#2
Dr. Tenpenny
@DrTenpenny · 87,500
#3
Dr Philip McMillan
@PhilipMcMillan · 1,876
#4
Dr. Edward Group, DC
@drgroupofficial · 19,572
#5
Dr Mike Yeadon
@DrMikeYeadon · 26,850
#6
David Avocado Wolfe
@davidavocadowolfe · 101,346
#7
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel
@DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,912
#8
The Dr. Ardis Show
@thedrardisshow · 12,757
#9
Christiane Northrup M.D
@drchristianenorthrup · 40,942
#10
World Doctors Alliance
@worlddoctorsalliance · 74,767
#11
World Council for Health
@wch_org · 33,944
#12
Cruel History
@cruel_historyy · 102,993
#13
Children’s Health Defense
@childrenshd · 52,391
#14
Dr. Robert O Young (Ph.D) Covid News & Analysis
@DrRobertOYoungNews · 1,191
#15
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
@P_McCulloughMD · 15,493
#16
Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD · 103,075
#17
PARASITES - THE GREAT AWAKENING
@ParasitesTheGreatAwakening · 7,674
#18
Russell Brand
@RussellBrand4 · 7,864
#19
Independent Medical Alliance
@HonestMedicine · 3,596
#20
HISTORY
@secret_history2 · 68,537
#21
Covid Vaccine Adverse Reactions
@covidvaccineadversereactions · 5,946
#22
Dr. Aaron Kheriaty
@AaronKheriaty · 2,827
#23
Dr Sherri Tenpenny
@SherriTenpenny · 4,334
#24
Independent Medical Alliance
@IMA_Health · 30,966
#25
Dr. Judy Mikovits
@dr_judymikovitss · 25,230
#26
Dr David Martin
@DrDavidMartin · 49,760
#27
Health Ranger
@RealHealthRanger · 62,438
#28
Dr. Shankara Chetty
@ShankaraChetty · 5,180
#29
LauraAboli
@LauraAbolichannel · 165,156
#30
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox · 118,654
#31
Dr. Harvey Risch
@HarveyRisch · 5,030
#32
Dr. Naomi Wolf
@NaomiWolfOfficial · 3,576
#33
Catturd ™️
@TheCatturd · 33,864
#34
Man in America 🇺🇸
@maninamerica · 29,506
#35
Jonathan Otto - Health Secret
@jonathanottohealth · 28,729
#36
Barbara O'Neill
@BarbaraONeilll · 6,671
#37
Edward Dowd
@Edward_Dowd · 12,240
#38
Lara Logan
@NoAgendaLara · 25,615
#39
Q) The Storm Rider /Official Page
@qthestormrider777 · 152,631
#40
Patriot Streetfighter
@patriotstreetfighter · 70,104
#41
Barbara O'Neill
@BarbaraOneill_official · 109,535
#42
Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
@SGTnewsNetwork · 109,567
#43
Dr Roger Hodkinson
@RogerHodkinson · 11,872
#44
Parasites Meet Cells 🪱
@ParasitesMeetCells · 3,737
#45
Karen Kingston
@joinmiFight · 5,143
#46
Robin Monotti
@robinmg · 66,892
#47
Jim Caviezel
@JimCaviezel_TG · 12,980
#48
Gateway Pundit
@gatewaypunditofficial · 108,059
#49
KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat · 113,959
#50
Barbara O'neill
@BarbaraOneillOfficial · 65,711
#51
Ezra A. Cohen
@Ezra_Cohen_Q17 · 68,020
#52
Dr. Scott Young-END THE FED
@DrScottNESARA · 29,771
#53
Dr. Aseem Malhotra
@AseemMalhotra · 7,831
#54
Expose The Agenda
@ETAgenda · 15,698
#55
Dr Naomi Wolf
@NaomiWolfDr · 24,646
#56
Jack Posobiec
@Jack_Posobiec · 113,696
#57
The Conspiracy Hole
@TheConspiracyHole · 104,270
#58
David Icke Official Telegram
@davidickeofficial · 42,257
#59
ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter 🐸
@PepeMatter · 142,270
#60
FallCabal Official Channel
@Fall_of_the_Cabal · 81,035
#61
One America News Network
@OANNTV · 140,626
#62
LA QUINTA COLUMNA TV
@laquintacolumna · 161,230
#63
The General
@GeneralMCNews · 142,298
#64
Amir Tsarfati
@beholdisraelchannel · 559,482
#65
RealRawNews
@realrawnews · 27,797
#66
Real-Time Daily News
@RealTimeDailyNews · 9,115
#67
Zeee Media 🎙
@zeeemedia · 53,592
#68
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺
@ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 83,263
#69
Donald J. Trump
@real_donaldjtrump · 579,193
#70
BioClandestine
@bioclandestine · 137,632
#71
STRANGER THAN FICTION NEWS
@stfn_news · 61,908
#72
George Webb - Investigative Journalist (Official Osprey Fanpage)
@GeorgeWebb · 6,037
#73

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Jonathan Otto - Health Secret
@jonathanottohealth · 28,729
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Dr. Edward Group, DC
@drgroupofficial · 19,572
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 September 2026
Christiane Northrup M.D
@drchristianenorthrup · 40,942
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Medical Medium
@MedicalMedium · 52,656
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Dr Jane Ruby
@DrJaneRuby · 56,991
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon
@DrMikeYeadon · 26,850
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
GreenMedInfo
@sayeregengmi · 27,442
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Man in America 🇺🇸
@maninamerica · 29,506
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026
Dr. Judy Mikovits
@dr_judymikovitss · 25,230
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Lee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1
@FreedomDoc1 · 24,337
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Dr David Martin
@DrDavidMartin · 49,760
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr. Bryan Ardis” (@BryanArdis), 36,472 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BryanArdis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.