Channel
@RealWorldNewsChannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25,527subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001416140089 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RealWorldNewsChannel |
| Description | ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat |
| Created | 11 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RealWorldNewsChannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 25,527 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 25,529 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 25,531 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 25,545 | -16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 25,561 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 25,558 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 25,556 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 25,557 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 25,557 | first reading |
100 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 100 (4 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 93,757 |
| Reactions total | 1,942 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,942 reactions across 100 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 348 | 17.9% | |
| 😈 | 348 | 17.9% | |
| 👍 | 325 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 214 | 11.0% | |
| 🤬 | 128 | 6.59% | |
| ❤ | 83 | 4.27% | |
| 😡 | 71 | 3.66% | |
| 🙏 | 60 | 3.09% | |
| 👏 | 52 | 2.68% | |
| 👀 | 50 | 2.57% | |
| 😨 | 45 | 2.32% | |
| 😢 | 34 | 1.75% | |
| 🎉 | 23 | 1.18% | |
| 😱 | 22 | 1.13% | |
| 💔 | 19 | 0.978% | |
| 🤯 | 18 | 0.927% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 0.875% | |
| 😭 | 12 | 0.618% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 0.566% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 0.515% | |
| 11 further kinds | 52 | 2.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,942reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sailors aboard USS Abraham Lincoln report harsh conditions during deployment Service members reportedly described limited access to fresh food, saying they had little to no fresh fruit and that frozen meat was often all that was available. One sailor said, “Sometimes it gets here rotten,” while another reportedly added, “Haven’t had milk in 3 months.” ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
🤬4😁2🙏2👍1
Earlier today, during an attack on Ali Taher hill in southern Lebanon, Israel reportedly used munitions containing white phosphorus. ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
😈12🤬6😡2🎉1
Total solar eclipse turns sky dark over Spain’s Picos de Urbión mountain range. ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
❤5👀4😱2😭1
Prof. Marandi says a major attack on Iran could hit any day Professor Marandi of the University of Tehran has delivered a stark warning. The United States has already prepared a major assault on Iran, with forces positioned across the region and a strong possibility the attack comes in the coming days. What follows could reshape the entire global economy. ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
🤯8😡5😁2😈1
Pfizer is currently facing multiple major lawsuits in the United States over its COVID-19 shots. ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
😁12😈5😨3😱2
Whistleblower says earthquakes can be triggered on demand Eric Hecker, who worked with Raytheon and Lockheed, claims the IceCube Neutrino Detector, a top-secret directed energy weapon exists, and it can cause earthquakes. "You can deliver energy wirelessly through the earthquake generating device." Not sci-fi. Not theory. He says it’s real. And he dares you: look it up yourself. ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealW…
💯5😨5👍3😁3
Official figures put the death toll from the Colombia earthquake at 241. The country has begun a three-day period of mourning for the victims. ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
😢10💔3😨1😱1
US Senator Chris Van Hollen called for Ambassador Mike Huckabee’s resignation, saying he has failed to protect US interests and become an “apologist for the extremist government in Israel.” Van Hollen said 30 other senators had urged Huckabee to hold Israel accountable for the deaths of more than nine Americans over the past four years. ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
💯15👍3❤2🤬1
"They can’t defeat Iran" "They began with unconditional surrender and achieved nothing" — Mohamed Marandi, professor at the University of Tehran ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
💯13👍2🔥1😈1
Iranian General Mohammad Reza Naqdi on US-Israel War: "The longer this war lasts, the more experience we gain. We had never seen a real war to gain real experience, to learn how to fight with America. In these five months, we have learned how. We have also seen how the American military is weaker than what we perceived." ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
👍12💯3😈2👏1
Trump last night: "The country is doing well, prices are dropping fast, Iran is going absolutely fine, we control the Strait of Hormuz, and things are going great for our country." ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
😈16🤬9😭3💘2
Spain just went dark in the middle of the day. Total solar eclipse, Tarragona, Spain. ⏯️ @RealWorldNewsChannel ✳️ @RealWorldNewsChat
❤10😍5👀2😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @RealWorldNewsChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 50,088 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Real World News” (@RealWorldNewsChannel), 25,527 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealWorldNewsChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.