Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tips AI | IT & AI

@tips_ai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,311subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001904042808
TypeChannel
Username@tips_ai
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tips_ai

Growth

25,28525,31125,2986 August 2026 — 25,285 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,296 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,308 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,304 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,303 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,299 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,300 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,303 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,311 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,281–25,315 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:4525,311+8
12 Aug 2026, 04:0825,303+3
11 Aug 2026, 07:2125,300+1
10 Aug 2026, 07:3125,299-4
9 Aug 2026, 07:5425,303-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:0525,304-4
7 Aug 2026, 13:2125,308+12
6 Aug 2026, 13:0125,296+11
6 Aug 2026, 02:3725,285first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.1%
avg views ÷ 25,311 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,350
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (20 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total158,860
Reactions total1,590
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,384 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍36626.4%
🔥31522.8%
24517.7%
😁23316.8%
🤣1208.67%
🤡473.40%
😢352.53%
🗿181.30%
🫡50.361%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,590reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 25 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tips_ai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈2,180 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁17👍6🔥51

12 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈2,050 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @syabro_notesVideo

Rejudge — независимая проверка для ИИ-агентов. https://rejudge.syabro.com/ru/ https://github.com/syabro/rejudge Выкатываю еще один свой инструмент в паблик Код, который написал агент, можно проверить четырьмя способами, где каждый следующий способ ловит больше предыдущего: I. Та же сессия, та же модель. Агент перечитывает свой код. Он уже решил, что код правильный, и повторное чтение это решение не меняет. II.

👍22🔥95

11 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈4,210 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Модели Claude теперь будут встраивать невидимые водяные знаки во все тексты и файлы Связано это с тем, что антропики подписали европейский AI Act по прозрачности ИИ-контента, но применяться это будет во всем мире. Как это работает: > Текст: модель будет вплетать вотермарку прямо в слова. Она не видима для человека и может переносится после копирования или некоторых правок > Файлы (SVG, PNG, JPG и т. д): модель буде

👍41😢22🤡155🗿5🤣2

10 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈3,980 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Знаю что для разработки есть эмулятор Xcode которым уже неплохо управляют ии-агенты, но стало интересно есть ли что-то подобное для реальных устройств Оказывается есть: Скормите вашему агенту phone-harness, скилл который объясняет ему как использовать маковский iPhone Mirroring для управления айфоном Я бы описал это как Computer Use, но для телефона: 1/ Агент делает скриншот экрана 2/ С помощью встроенного в macOS

👍219🔥4🗿3

10 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈4,260 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Просто знайте, что cегодня OpenAI окончательно отключила свой ии-браузер ChatGPT Atlas, он просуществовал всего 9 месяцев Кто-то даже создал сайт чтобы трекать все мертвые проекты OpenAI. Кто следующий на очереди? 🤔 @tips_ai #news

😁29👍11😢74

7 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈6,200 views50 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁2413🔥8👍5

6 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈6,050 views26 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня из интересного: лаба Prime Intellect выпустила своего CLI-агента типо клод кода, и назвали Prime Agent Туда можно подключить свою подписку Claude или ChatGPT и работать как в обычном терминальном агенте, но с RLM и Continual Harness Простыми словами это обвязка по верх ии модели, которая: 1/ Делит большую задачу на части, раздаёт их субагентам обычным вызовом функции rlm("подзадача"), а затем собирает общи

👍146🔥4🫡2

5 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈15,500 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

meat-proxy — человек который отправляет ответ ИИ вместо своей точки зрения не будьте meat-proxy 😏 @tips_ai

🤣63😁23👍173🔥2😢1

4 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC≈6,170 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Добавьте это в конфиг своего Codex: [features] default_mode_request_user_input = true Эта строка разрешает Codex использовать интерактивное окно, не только в plan-режиме но и в обычных чатах, где он задаёт вопрос и предлагает несколько готовых вариантов ответа Я уже привык к этой фичи в клоде, и вот в кодексе её особенно не хватало @tips_ai

👍39🔥127🤣3

3 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC≈5,990 views57 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Помните делал пост про то как чатботы решают какой сайт упомянуть в ответе? Так вот кроме уже очевидных способов по типу llms.txt, подглядел у одного стартапа еще одну неплохую идею как сделать сайт более читаемым для ИИ: У них достаточно запутанное ценообразование, и агенты не могли разобраться со слайдером на основе JS. Как они решили эту проблему: вынесли все тарифы, цены, и что входит в отдельный markdown файл

24🔥12👍10🤡5🤣5🫡1

30 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC≈8,810 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Да, знаю что у вас и так уже куча скиллов, но сегодня делал вместе с fable онбординг и использовал вот этот репо чтобы не выглядело иишно Там набор из 7 скиллов для полной полировки дизайна интерфейсов: better-typography — использовал для шрифтов, сетки размеров, переносов и тд. better-ui — радиусы, тени, анимации, иконки better-layout — структура, группировка, отступы, адаптивность better-colors — работа с палитро

👍4518🔥12🤣5🫡1

29 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC≈7,880 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Наткнулся на особенность /model в Claude Code, про которую я если честно не знал и не замечал. Если менять модель через обычный /model, это влияет сразу на все новые параллельные сессии. Что и написано при выборе модели, меня не обманывают: saved as your default for new sessions. Если нужно задать модель только для текущей сессии, при выборе модели в /model подтверждать нужно не клавишей Enter, а буквой [ s ], тог

👍2516🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @tips_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,148 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Технологии | Нейросети | Боты
@aiaiai · 177,975
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tips AI | IT & AI” (@tips_ai), 25,311 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tips_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.