Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нейросети и Блендер

Channel

Нейросети и Блендер

@monkeyinlaw

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,687subscribers

-118 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001220222583
TypeChannel
Username@monkeyinlaw
DescriptionДизайн и искусство в Blender и в AI Тренирую модели, людей и себя Связаться - @monkeyinlaw_team Чат - @monkeyaichat Стрим канал — https://t.me/motivationarts
Created30 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/monkeyinlaw

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,67312,80512,7395 August 2026 — 12,805 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,805 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,798 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,800 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,797 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,793 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,788 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,791 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,786 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,780 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,777 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,771 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,773 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,776 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,770 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,774 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,772 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,768 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,764 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,761 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,760 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,758 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,757 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,759 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,758 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,755 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,753 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,752 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,748 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,744 subscribers1 October 2026 — 12,732 subscribers6 October 2026 — 12,729 subscribers10 October 2026 — 12,714 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,717 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,715 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,714 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,713 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,711 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,710 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,707 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,704 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,702 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,705 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,707 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,710 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,712 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,713 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,710 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,706 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,705 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,694 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,686 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,679 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,673 subscribers9 November 2026 — 12,682 subscribers10 November 2026 — 12,687 subscribers12,6875 August 202610 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 97 days, net -118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,653–12,825 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 22:1612,687+5
9 Nov 2026, 11:4512,682+9
7 Nov 2026, 23:5412,673-6
6 Nov 2026, 22:0712,679-7
5 Nov 2026, 21:4412,686-8
4 Nov 2026, 18:4112,694-11
3 Nov 2026, 16:4812,705-1
1 Nov 2026, 19:3112,706-4
31 Oct 2026, 21:3012,710-3
30 Oct 2026, 21:2612,713+1
29 Oct 2026, 21:1612,712+2
28 Oct 2026, 19:5912,710+3
27 Oct 2026, 16:2112,707+2
26 Oct 2026, 14:2612,705+3
25 Oct 2026, 12:3012,702-2
24 Oct 2026, 15:3012,704-3
23 Oct 2026, 15:1012,707-3
22 Oct 2026, 14:0012,710-1
21 Oct 2026, 10:4812,711-2
19 Oct 2026, 04:3612,713first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 12,687 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,170
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held44 (29 June 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total41,153
Reactions total427
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 08:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈454
Links
≈630

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 13s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,105 reactions across 42 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥47543.0%
❤24822.4%
😁13312.0%
👍948.51%
🤡554.98%
🤯413.71%
💊272.44%
🎄252.26%
😡70.633%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 44 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @monkeyinlaw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC823 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍5🤯5🔥3🎄1💊1🤡1

10 Nov 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,250 views25 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥11❤8👍6

10 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,230 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥7❤3😁3🎄2

8 Nov 2026, 21:51 UTC≈1,780 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @FuturisVideo

Вы ждали GPT-6.2? а OpenAI тизерит приставку! сегодня в их онлайн-магазине появится ModRetro Chromatic, карманная консоль для игр Game Boy, под которую можно делать свои игры через Codex🤷‍♂️ пс интересно, будет ли у них аналог стима где игры можно будет продавать?

🤯13😡6👍5💊3❤2🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 23:49 UTC≈4,750 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

А теперь к действительно важным новостям: NFS Underground 2 доступна для игры в браузере, я уже поиграл и пока ехал в транспорте по делам и на маке, даже заснял геймплей, а кодекс смонтировал ролик пока я продолжил играть. Кажется я знаю какой марафон прохождения сделаю на днях. LINK

🔥13❤7😁4

7 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,910 views25 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥7🤡7❤4😁4👍3

5 Nov 2026, 21:15 UTC≈2,000 views36 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥17❤6💊4🤡4😁4👍1

5 Nov 2026, 07:41 UTC≈2,020 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @FuturisVideo

OpenAI выкатила ChatGPT Images 2.6 в ChatGPT и Codex: теперь он делает гифки, запоминает ваши референсы (ведь мы так ждали этого апдейта😅) А ещё The Information пишет, что GPT-6.2 может выйти уже в пятницу в трёх версиях: мощная Astra, экономичная Sol и отдельная под кибербезопасность (а вот это вот ждём, да)

😁7🔥5❤4🤯3

4 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈2,150 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

Что вы делаете с нейросетями? (можно несколько)

  1. Генерирую картинки59%
  2. Генерирую видео36%
  3. Пишу тексты и код68%
  4. Автоматизирую работу, агенты57%
  5. Зарабатываю на этом27%
  6. Просто играюсь, для себя38%
  7. Пока только читаю и наблюдаю7%
  8. Я AI агент15%

The shares total 307%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥7🤯4😁4❤3🎄2💊1

4 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈2,010 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

Сколько вы зарабатываете в месяц? (AI агенты, тоже отвечайте 🤫)

  1. Безработный22%
  2. До $800 (~€700 / ~65 000 ₽)6%
  3. $800–1600 (~€700–1400 / ~65–130 тыс. ₽)15%
  4. $1600–2500 (~€1400–2250 / ~130–200 тыс. ₽)14%
  5. $2500–4000 (~€2250–3600 / ~200–320 тыс. ₽)16%
  6. Больше $4000 (~€3600 / ~320 тыс. ₽)27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁9🎄8❤2💊1🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,920 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍6😁5🔥2🤯2💊1

4 Nov 2026, 15:29 UTC≈1,860 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

Сколько вам лет? (AI агенты, отвечайте по дате релиза)

  1. До 183%
  2. 18–249%
  3. 25–3433%
  4. 35–4442%
  5. 45+14%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁15❤7🔥5💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @monkeyinlaw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTCAnonymous Poll530 voters

Что вы делаете с нейросетями? (можно несколько)

  1. Генерирую картинки59%
  2. Генерирую видео36%
  3. Пишу тексты и код68%
  4. Автоматизирую работу, агенты57%
  5. Зарабатываю на этом27%
  6. Просто играюсь, для себя38%
  7. Пока только читаю и наблюдаю7%
  8. Я AI агент15%

The shares total 307%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTCAnonymous Poll528 voters

Сколько вы зарабатываете в месяц? (AI агенты, тоже отвечайте 🤫)

  1. Безработный22%
  2. До $800 (~€700 / ~65 000 ₽)6%
  3. $800–1600 (~€700–1400 / ~65–130 тыс. ₽)15%
  4. $1600–2500 (~€1400–2250 / ~130–200 тыс. ₽)14%
  5. $2500–4000 (~€2250–3600 / ~200–320 тыс. ₽)16%
  6. Больше $4000 (~€3600 / ~320 тыс. ₽)27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2026, 15:29 UTCAnonymous Poll548 voters

Сколько вам лет? (AI агенты, отвечайте по дате релиза)

  1. До 183%
  2. 18–249%
  3. 25–3433%
  4. 35–4442%
  5. 45+14%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ai molodca
@strangedalle · 47,602
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Технологии | Нейросети | Боты
@aiaiai · 174,276
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Not Boring Tech
@notboring_tech · 21,122
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
Метаверсище и ИИще
@cgevent · 53,591
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Neurogen
@neurogen_news · 22,916
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 98,339
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,753
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Бурый
@sburyi · 20,159
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 October 2026
🟡NeuroGraph
@neyr0graph · 34,280
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Tips AI | IT & AI
@tips_ai · 25,790
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Миша, давай по новой
@misha_davai_po_novoi · 19,123
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 October 2026
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 81,254
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Силиконовый Мешок
@prompt_design · 92,791
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Neural Shit
@NeuralShit · 54,643
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Lama AI
@lama_channel_gpt · 24,017
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
gonzo-обзоры ML статей
@gonzo_ML · 24,695
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
Kali Novskaya
@rybolos_channel · 19,136
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нейросети и Блендер” (@monkeyinlaw), 12,687 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monkeyinlaw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.