Channel
@someshitovo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,248subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001883912364 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @someshitovo |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/someshitovo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 1,248 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 1,253 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 1,258 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,265 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 1,265 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 16 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 14 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌭 | 71 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @someshitovo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 February 2026 to 5 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
все: нужен контент-план, формат, регулярность, польза, шерабельность, просто настрой hermes и он сам будет вести канал самшитовые заросли: послушайте эту разъебную песенку с утра – 70 подписчиков, меньше 1к просмотров, нет на спотифае, вайбы экспедиции 33
🌭9
традиционный пятничный банан 🍌
🌭4
взлетели, получается 🚀🚀🚀 (кто не в курсе, это рейтинг креативности ассоциации коммуникационных агентств россии – ну самый главный типа)
🌭13
Эйчары: задают странные вопросы на собеседованиях и занимаются гостингом Сетка: ни на что не намекаем, но…😧
🌭5
🌿 Сетка выпустила ролик, где индустрию сравнивают с джунглями, но со своими правилами. Смотрю и думаю: кто-то явно забыл взять карту, а кто-то уже нашёл короткий путь к успеху.
🌭4
Додо вместе с The Clients продолжают делать симпатичные и человечные рекламные кампании. В этот раз про то, что можно не делиться пиццей. Отдельно хочется отметить приятный кастинг и естественную игру актеров
🌭5
The Clients сегодня опять раздали стиля. Сразу два релиза: один потрясающе человечный, второй тоже, но еще и нейронный. Респект командам, продакшенам и клиентам. Про что рассказать подробнее на неделе?
🌭3
Поговорим с песком по-бырому Чуваки из канадского стартапа Taalas придумали как превратить текстовую модель в кремний Зачем? Чтобы повысить скорость ответа в 70 раз. Это абсолютно имбовая штука для робототехники и прочих юзкейсов, где скорость критичнее свежести модели. Поговорить с чатботом (на llama 8b) можно здесь. Задайте ему вопрос, подразумевающий очень длинный ответ, и 🤯 17000 токенов в секунду 💀
🌭3
Февральский «что ни день, то релиз» продолжается ♊️ Gemini 3.1 Pro #1 На Artificial Analysis, 77.1% ARC-AGI-2 ну и в целом сильные бенчи. Посмотрим, как будет в деле. Gemini 3 Pro на практике плохо справлялась с кодом и агентскими воркфлоу. Зато у нее был очень интересный характер в написании текстов – дерзкий и напористый, очень сильно отличалась от других моделей, которые я использую.
🌭3
В октябре друзья из Mara Studio пригласили меня на Кипр — выступить на ивенте про ИИ. Другие спикеры рассказывали про GEO-оптимизацию, генеративное видео и агентов. Я рассказал про то, как научил Клода придумывать классные идеи, за которые не стыдно почти сорокалетнему креативному директору, а заодно сделал из этого внутренний (пока что) продукт для агентства – Щелкунчик. Если вы пытаетесь сделать с чатботом стратег…
🌭5
В Индии прошел AI Impact Summer кринжфест Кто не знает, рядом с индийским премьером Моди – Сэм Альтман (OpenAI) и Дарио Амодеи (Anthropic). Ну или их агенты, которые еще не до конца научились управлять своими мясными конечностями.
🌭3
Папка: «ИИ для бизнеса: от стратегии до внедрения» Мой канал в ней: «ИИ для всего остального» Коллеги разбирают, как пересобрать маркетинг на нейросетях. Я разбираю, почему Gemini генерит кривой шансон, анонсы китайских имидж-моделей с помощью человека в костюме банана перед маркерной доской, ну и голубей с фиолетовыми ирокезами. Так, чисто для полноты картины. Нельзя нормально внедрять то, в чём не видишь абсурда…
🌭3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @someshitovo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“самшитовые заросли” (@someshitovo), 1,248 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/someshitovo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.