Channel
@AcidCrunch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
9,608subscribers
+63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002232794854 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AcidCrunch |
| Description | ⚡️ AI в GameDev и Media — через нейросети и личный R&D 🎯 Новости, эксперименты, prompts, tutorials и хаки Чат: https://t.me/+A--pIccfkaQyZWIy |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AcidCrunch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 9,608 | +81 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:10 | 9,527 | -17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:40 | 9,544 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 9,545 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 28,255 |
| Reactions total | 276 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
276 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 92 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 87 | 31.5% | |
| custom 5260370773276651926 | 29 | 10.5% | |
| 🍌 | 26 | 9.42% | |
| custom 5260581076350305439 | 18 | 6.52% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 3.26% | |
| 🌭 | 6 | 2.17% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 2.17% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.09% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AcidCrunch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Vtzqx6L4pi | 1 | 2 August 2026 | 2 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
У Змеек вышел новый полный метр аж на 2 часа хронометража. Кэл, Хорас и Оли — три лондонских рэпера, которым уже под тридцать, а карьера все еще топчется на месте. Они разносят пустой зал убийственным сетом, получают угрозы от криминального босса, которому принадлежит клуб, и едва не распадаются. После восьми пинт Кэла наконец посещает гениальная идея: снять клип в джакузи, сделанной из лодки. Подходящая шлюпка нах…
Немного нейронаучпопа для тех, кто любит почитать Лайфхаки и приемчики слегка поднадоели. Хочется ненадолго выдохнуть, расслабиться и просто раствориться в писанине. Думаю, иногда буду выпускать статьи на темы, которые мне самому интересны. Получится что-то вроде смеси мыслей, дизайна, обывательской философии и AI. Первая статья называется «Очеловечивание». Для нее я где-то поресерчил, где-то докинул собственных н…
❤11👀3custom 52603707732766519262🌭1🍌1
В Figma появились вложенные папки. Теперь папки можно создавать внутри других папок, выстраивая многоуровневую структуру для файлов и проектов. Вместе с этим Figma обновила логику шаринга и прав доступа для такой структуры. Функцию уже начали раскатывать, в течение нескольких недель она станет доступна всем пользователям. 😂 Твой Crunch
custom 52603707732766519264❤3
Дизайнеры и подписчики, этого перчика я знаю уже 7 лет. Юный гений пришёл в профессию в 16 лет и уже тогда выдавал на редкость шикарные дизайн-решения. Так что советую подписаться и почитать, о чём он вещает! ❤️ 😂 Твой Crunch
❤8
Мы нащупали идеальное применение вайбкодинга в продукте Дано: - нехватка дизайнеров - B2B-стрим админки: сложный сам по себе, в макетах чёрт ногу сломит плюс другие проблемы заброшки - объёмная задача из этого стрима - отдельный репозиторий с компонентами админки и скиллами для ИИ-агента, в том числе дизайн-скиллом Процесс: 1. Менеджер идёт копать задачу: формулирует проблему, общается с пользователями, выясняет по…
❤4🔥3
Kandinsky 3D: СберКот вышел за рамки плоскости Решил проверить Kandinsky 3D по рабочим моментам и сгенерил там СберКота. По-моему, получилось збс: сидит уверенно, формы смотрятся авторитетно. Такой не просит корм, он одобряет тебе кредит на него. Как тебе результат? Присылай в комментарии свои 3D-эксперименты. Сервис А если серьёзно, пацаны сделайте Сберкота это всё же наш маскот. И вход не только по SberID, не …
🔥11🌭2❤1👀1custom 52605810763503054391
Привет! Советую посмотреть и подписаться на моего товарища сеньора-генеративщика, если ещё этого не сделал! 😂 Твой Crunch
custom 52605810763503054394
Дизайнерам подборочка Нашёл Klikkenthéke — огромный каталог современного веб-дизайна, в котором собрано почти 1400 сайтов. Главная фишка нормальный поиск. Референсы можно фильтровать по 172 тематикам и 108 стилям: от минимализма, Баухауса и брутализма до нестандартных сеток, крупной типографики, параллакса и анимаций. Есть фильтры по цвету, стране, шрифту, дизайнеру и разработчику. Удобно, когда нужно что-то конкр…
🔥14❤8custom 52605810763503054392
Что есть искусство? Трудности перевода Начну, как всегда, с водяной прелюдии. Мы с женой по возможности ходим на разные выставки. Особенно люблю смотреть работы молодых современных художников. В том же МИФе частенько выставляют очень сильные работы с привкусом чертовщины и русской идентичности. Ещё люблю цифровые выставки с элементами нейросетей, игрой света и взаимодействием со зрителем. Но есть одна вещь, которая…
custom 52603707732766519268❤6🍌5👀1
Разворачиваем LLM в корпоративном контуре и подключаем агента на OpenClaw 6 августа в 16:00 команда VK Cloud проведет практический воркшоп. За 90 минут онлайн-кодинга развернем языковую модель на облачной GPU и подключим агента на OpenClaw — open-source фреймворке для LLM-агентов. Подойдет тем, кто работает с чувствительными данными, но не может использовать внешние API и загружать в сторонние сервисы документы по…
🍌7❤4🔥2🌭1👀1custom 52603707732766519261custom 52605810763503054391
Grok Imagine получила обновления, включающие функцию голосовой согласованности, поддержку нескольких источников, преобразование текста в видео и встроенную поддержку разрешения 1080p! Пользователи смогут использовать функцию @-тегирования для ссылок на файлы через агент Grok Imagine, чтобы повторно использовать ранее созданные персонажи с сохранением их голоса. Теперь доступно для подписчиков SuperGrok Plus и Heavy…
🔥22❤4💯3
Кем работаешь, чем маешься?
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @AcidCrunch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кем работаешь, чем маешься?
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 25,188 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Acid Crunch — AI, GameDev, R&D, нейросети и GPT хаки” (@AcidCrunch), 9,608 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AcidCrunch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.