10 Jan 2023, 12:16 UTCviews —
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 30 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
Channel
>>>华人文化研究所<<<_tag支那屠支芝麻共和改良反共
@chinesebadcultual
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
159subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001180110699 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chinesebadcultual |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chinesebadcultual |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 159 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 161 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 161 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
1 Mar 2022, 15:30 UTC≈6,910 viewsread 28 August 2026
随着中国全面向西方国家低头认错，往后五年内国内发生大规模动乱的可能性会进一步提高。 首先我们想想习近平的思维模式之一的“树立敌人-打倒敌人”，这个并不是习首创而是由中共一直沿用多年，行之有效的一种维护政权合理性，同时又可以化解国内矛盾的手段。只不过习在这个手段上用得有点过火了。自从习就任以来，这差不多10年间，尤其是特朗普在任期间，中共顺藤摸瓜地强化了“美帝国主义”的这个“外患”，和“资本家”这个内忧。但如果中共一旦向美国认错，就等于是否定了“西方国家”这个活稻草人。另一方面，国内的资本家基本上已经被“打扫干净”得差不多了。这样两个敌人形象都会变得模糊。但中共要维持自己的执政合理性，必须要继续维持这种“树立敌人-打倒敌人”的模式，这就需要一个“敌人”。 然后我们讲讲年轻人。从上面提到的内容我们可以注意到，从习上台到今天，已经可以有一代人从小学生成长到大学生，甚至从大学毕业。这些年轻人自幼就是成长在习的话语模式之下，已经形成了…
11 Feb 2022, 07:32 UTC≈5,380 viewsread 28 August 2026
https://www.rfi.fr/cn/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD/20220203-%E7%BD%91%E7%BB%9C%E6%96%87%E6%91%98-%E5%AE%A2%E8%A7%82%E8%AF%84%E4%BB%B7%E4%B9%A0%E8%BF%91%E5%B9%B3
2 Feb 2022, 08:25 UTC≈4,370 viewsread 28 August 2026
File
分享 5_6327776159010391277.pdf
3 Jan 2022, 15:28 UTC≈4,170 viewsread 28 August 2026
http://dlvr.it/SGRPmS
2 Jan 2022, 17:37 UTC≈3,740 viewsread 28 August 2026
File
File, posted without a caption
12 Nov 2021, 04:32 UTC≈3,890 viewsread 28 August 2026
File
Saved by @download_it_bot 忠孝难两全 大义灭亲则是破坏了社会最基本的人伦 人性与信仰之间的关系 关注Youtube账号https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr_F4Y9iboUKlg_ZPm4jkVQ
12 Nov 2021, 04:32 UTC≈3,440 viewsread 28 August 2026
老梁：忠孝问题及文革故事。
12 Nov 2021, 03:00 UTC≈3,380 viewsread 28 August 2026
以后在墙内看见粉红的朋友批评左派或者右派，可以给他们一句 历史上，第一次出现左右之分，只有是资本主义社会。所以，连资本主义都达不到的，就别说人家是左派，自己是中间了。都是劳动人民，分啥左右呢？
6 Nov 2021, 17:56 UTC≈4,330 viewsread 28 August 2026
最近频频出现的治疗新冠的特效药，让世界各地的人们看到了疫情彻底结束的希望。而对于中国，有一种观点认为，只要世界的疫情整体结束，中国迫于世界的总体风向，便会重新开放边境控制，并恢复常态。 首先，我们需要认清一个问题，新冠常态化跟“疫情”没有必然联系。这个看似矛盾实际统一的问题在于，我们是如何看待“疫情”这个东西的。换了是现代文明社会，应对疫情就是部分地、短暂地封闭社会，并尽快研究应对疫情治疗的药物。但在中国，情况并非如此。因为中国政府有一项“艰巨的任务”，就是要代表广大人民的根本利益，所以对于“疫情”那是必须要清零的。所以中国必须间歇性地“短暂地封闭社会”以达到清零目标。关键在于现代文明社会的短暂封闭，既不是完全封闭，更不是为了清零，而是为了降低医疗压力。而“代表广大人民的根本利益”的目标在于“消除社会恐惧”，因为民众对新冠并没有一个科学的认识，因此产生恐惧，而为了完全消除恐惧让民众产生对政府的认同，政府就必须无条件地对清零负全…
25 Oct 2021, 12:43 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «>>>华人文化研究所<<<_tag支那屠支芝麻共和改良反共»
14 Oct 2021, 04:45 UTC≈2,700 viewsread 28 August 2026
最近广州的公租房政策，对今后的房地产市场有重大意义。 首先我们来分析一下政策本身。这个公租房政策看似激进，但由于是地方参考上面的意思制定的，并没有一个“军令状”去确保那个量完成。但它本身达到了两个目标：首先是对中央的房住不炒的具体执行提供了一个比较明确的解决模式；其次是对市场释出了一个明确的信号，即今后的一段时间主推公租房。至于最终能否投入这么多公租房，尤其是有没有这么多的市场需求（租客），他们都可以按实际状况做调整。 但我们可以看到的是，这是中央的房住不炒政策的必然结果，即使广州不推这个政策，最终中央也会出指引。习近平不惜推倒整个房地产行业的目的之一，在于将住房系统彻底垄断，这包括建筑业，房屋买卖，以及租赁体系。其施行的手段主要有二，一是只要我限制甚至停止贷款，让房地产商的资金来源枯竭，同时让一般人的炒房资金乃至途径断裂。于个人而言，甚至没有完成供楼的房子转让都有困难；二是对市场大量供应公租房，降低所谓的刚需市场购买欲望，…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chinesebadcultual. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“>>>华人文化研究所<<<_tag支那屠支芝麻共和改良反共” (@chinesebadcultual), 159 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chinesebadcultual.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.