Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

荔枝木

@lychee_wood

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

17,698subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001119983390
TypeChannel
Username@lychee_wood
Description这个世界很复杂。 我们尝试去与复杂性共存,是为了更加美好的明天。 由于水平有限,难免有错误和疏漏,请读者进行批评指正。 购物链接为 Aff Link,各位的购买将会用于继续支持本频道创作。 本频道不是专业新闻媒体,无法保证所有消息的真实性和时效性,各位看官看个乐就行,所有消息一律当可信度存疑处理,感谢合作。
Created28 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lychee_wood

Growth

17,63117,69917,6656 August 2026 — 17,660 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,657 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,653 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,643 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,638 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,631 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,675 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,699 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,698 subscribers17,6986 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,621–17,709 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:3617,698-1
13 Aug 2026, 12:4817,699+24
12 Aug 2026, 11:3717,675+44
11 Aug 2026, 13:3417,631-7
10 Aug 2026, 10:5817,638-5
9 Aug 2026, 11:3217,643-10
8 Aug 2026, 10:3617,653-4
6 Aug 2026, 12:4017,657-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:1717,660first reading

Engagement

99 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.69%
avg views ÷ 17,698 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
99 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.804%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
99
of 99 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 73 of 99 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held99 (2 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total169,796
Reactions total1,034
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
26,100
Videos
337
Links
3,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

909 reactions across 60 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁33937.3%
🙏14215.6%
🤯13414.7%
🔥9810.8%
🤔808.80%
🥰647.04%
525.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,034reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC533 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026

GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra 半小时干完了 DeepSeek V4 Pro 干了一个小时了在干嘛呢(但只花了 1.26 元无所谓了)

😁7

15 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC654 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

正在严肃测试 Anchored Standard Exp 体感上是比 Standard 好

🔥4

15 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC912 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026

姚远说他没有喝的原因不是因为相信科学,只是单纯不相信他爸。

😁21

14 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,370 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026

汕头人服用曼陀罗中毒抢救回来了上了新闻。曼陀罗是蒙汗药的材料,相当于自己把自己麻晕了。 好笑程度 1 之所以会服用是因为把它当蛇舌草摘回来烧凉茶了。 好笑程度 10 摘的人是姚远(汕头脱口秀演员)他爸,中毒的人是姚远的妈妈,然后他哥送他妈去医院后回家口渴又喝了一碗把自己弄进去了。 好笑程度 10000 这下段子来源于生活了

🙏21😁8

14 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈1,100 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @microblock_pubPhoto

??有人测出来 V4 Pro 在 Minimal 工具下启动行为和其它工具下表现完全不一样,Minimal 工具下和之前灰度时候的 “I need” CoT 一模一样,复现了一下是真的 真绷不住了,我说他们怎么做到官方跑 Terminal Bench 跑 87.9,结果 AA 跑的只有 79 的,感情搁这疯狂过拟合 Minimal Harness,还有安全词的说是 又要变祖了吗... DeepSeek V4 Pro 不是能力不行,而是对首次请求的工具结构极其敏感。官方 Standard/PTC 只有 91/92 分,Minimal 是 99/96,但只有两个工具。我们做了一个两阶段插件:首轮只给 shell + read 锚定 Minimal 推理轨迹,第一次工具调用后立刻恢复 Standard 全部 25 项工具。Windows 连跑两次 98/99,均值 98.5,第二轮全程 let me=0,证明不是抽卡,也不需要牺

🤯18😁4🤔21

14 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 15 August 2026

Funhpc 上出现了 DeepSeek V4Pro 0816 各位有头绪吗

14 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,820 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁28🔥51

14 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,310 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

全球最大的电动飞机 ES30 电动飞机完成首飞

🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @lychee_wood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@lychee_wood edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 28,348 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“荔枝木” (@lychee_wood), 17,698 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lychee_wood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.